my ET's dont match my mods?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-22-2011, 08:13 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
silver50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default my ET's dont match my mods?

99 camaro ls1, a4 with a precision 4000 stall.

12 bolt, full suspension, 3.73 gear. 15 inch skinnies, and 275/50 drag radials. .224/.230 cam, fast 102 intake and throttle body. Upgraded fuel pump. Long tube headers, off road y pipe, flowmaster catback. aftermarket lid with k&n. ABS deleted.

Car is a base model. Hardtop, manual locks and windows. No idea at the weight.

Made 384rwhp thru the stalled auto and 12 bolt.

Only ran 7.90@87 mph with a 1.70 60 foot. The mph shows that the car did NOT spin.

There are cars with my same mods running anywhere from 7.20 to 7.50. I am way off.

performance shop owner has offered to go to track tomorrow and see if he can find any problems.

thoughts on whats wrong? car ran 8.10 with just lid, k&n, longtubes, off road y, and exhaust.
Old 06-23-2011, 07:08 AM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
c0ncEpT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Shelby twp, MI
Posts: 1,514
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I have to ask...

Is it tuned?
Old 06-23-2011, 09:18 AM
  #3  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
thunderstruck507's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northwest AR
Posts: 8,357
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

What is the DA at the track calculated based on weather and altitude?

I agree your car appears lazy but DA can have a huge impact. I lost .3 going from 1800DA to 2600DA.

I would really hope to see a car like yours run 90-91mph in the 1/8th even in less than great air though. How much does it weigh? Don't guess...weigh it as you race it including yourself.

Does it feel lazy on the top end? What off road y pipe? Some are MUCH better than others. The flowmaster is also costing you power, get a cutout or ditch it for something that flows better.

How is your tune?
Old 06-23-2011, 12:48 PM
  #4  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
TravisMcGill2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: chats,ga
Posts: 1,722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

also how hard r u turning the car. whats ur shift points set at.
Old 06-23-2011, 12:49 PM
  #5  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
TravisMcGill2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: chats,ga
Posts: 1,722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Car should be 60ing alot better to. 1.70 is slugish with that much gear and stall.
Old 06-23-2011, 06:04 PM
  #6  
Teching In
 
BoostedSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Get rid of the converter and get a yank SS 4000. I had an a4 with a precision 3800 stall multi disk w/ manual lock up switch and ran similar to you. Was not impressed with the car. I swapped the converter at a last ditch effort to fix the poor performance and knocked out almost .2 60ft, .5 in the 1/4 mile and gained 3 mph through the traps. Toss the purple peice of ****.
Old 06-23-2011, 10:50 PM
  #7  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
silver50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

havent weighed the car. Ran the car again tonight and the shop owner came and ran it. He is probably 70-80 lbs lighter than me, and it performed worse with him. He ran two passes identical. 8.14@85 mph with a 1.70 60 foot. Dont know the DA but it was less than 80 degrees out, and the weather was a lot better than when I ran it for the above times. I did run it before he got there and I ran 7.89@86mph with a much better 1.61 60 foot.

Car is tuned, thats how it made 384rwhp. Dyno tune. Shop owner said the car feels very lazy, like a car without any timing and it seemed to be struggling to run. Said it doesnt even rev free and easy like it should. The car DID run a lot better the day i picked it up from the shop. Felt great on street and would plant you in the seat. Now, it just feels dead.

I left it at their shop to be put back on the dyno and looked over. He said it could be a bad knock sensor or something and it could be pulling timing out of the car???

I hope and pray they find the problem or I just wasted a lot of money haha.
Old 06-23-2011, 10:59 PM
  #8  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
silver50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

oh yeah. the headers and y pipe are pacesetter. I know the flowmaster is junk, and i havent weighed the car.

But, I am off a good 5-6 mph and theres gotta be an explanation.

edit: the guy I got it from had it weighed. The car weighed 3350 when I bought it with stock 16 in wheels. I weigh 260, the car now has the 12 bolt which is heavier, but it also now has ABS delete, and it also now has 15in streetlie wheels so that should counter the weight of the 12 bolt. So lets ASSUME the car weighs with me in it:

3610 to 3650. Cant be off by much. the car is a 1SC car

Last edited by silver50; 06-23-2011 at 11:08 PM.
Old 06-24-2011, 03:06 PM
  #9  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
thunderstruck507's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northwest AR
Posts: 8,357
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

CHecked the o2 sensors?

Had a friend once who's car was running like you describe, he cleaned the MAF and put in a new 02 sensor once he saw it wasn't switching and it picked up a ton in the 1/8th mile (~.4)
Old 06-24-2011, 05:08 PM
  #10  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
silver50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

hopefully the tuner comes up with a solution and I will post his findings.

The car no longer has a MAF. It is speed density. Said they do away with the MAF and tune it speed density when you have the larger intake like that fast. The MAF becomes a restriction.
Old 06-25-2011, 12:25 AM
  #11  
Teching In
 
BoostedSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by silver50
havent weighed the car. Ran the car again tonight and the shop owner came and ran it. He is probably 70-80 lbs lighter than me, and it performed worse with him. He ran two passes identical. 8.14@85 mph with a 1.70 60 foot. Dont know the DA but it was less than 80 degrees out, and the weather was a lot better than when I ran it for the above times. I did run it before he got there and I ran 7.89@86mph with a much better 1.61 60 foot.

Car is tuned, thats how it made 384rwhp. Dyno tune. Shop owner said the car feels very lazy, like a car without any timing and it seemed to be struggling to run. Said it doesnt even rev free and easy like it should. The car DID run a lot better the day i picked it up from the shop. Felt great on street and would plant you in the seat. Now, it just feels dead.

I left it at their shop to be put back on the dyno and looked over. He said it could be a bad knock sensor or something and it could be pulling timing out of the car???

I hope and pray they find the problem or I just wasted a lot of money haha.
The smartest thing that should've been done was to data log the runs at the track instead of putting it back on the dyno. What did you do differently that you knocked off a tenth in your 60ft?
Old 06-25-2011, 07:54 AM
  #12  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
silver50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nothing different than last time. I was at a different track. It was a good 12 degrees cooler. Same burnout. Same tire pressure. I had 1.61 and 1.65. Other driver was 1.70 and the 330 was way off like it just quit pulling. The tuner couldn't make it to the track to log the runs. He is though gonna drive it around and log it.
Old 06-27-2011, 05:10 PM
  #13  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
silver50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

got word today on what the tuner found. 3 things wrong.

It had somehow come to bet set on "low octane mode" whatever that even means.

It was picking up false knock and pulling timing out.

And he didnt elaborate on the third. Car is fixed now and they say it runs really well.

But he left it back at the performance shop because somethings wrong with rearend. I knew it made too much noise.

I will update on further ETs when we go back to track
Old 06-27-2011, 07:32 PM
  #14  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
ssdeuce74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: crownsville md
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

did they say what caused the knock retard was something loose making noise or just a bad sensor.
Old 06-27-2011, 07:50 PM
  #15  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
s346k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: johnson co.
Posts: 3,433
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by thunderstruck507
What off road y pipe? Some are MUCH better than others. The flowmaster is also costing you power, get a cutout or ditch it for something that flows better.

How is your tune?
everyone says that **** about ypipes and the flowmaster. i don't buy it at all. if that is the case, how does a stock 99 car with a lid and weld in flowmaster 80 series ONLY trap 88 in the 1/8 @ 2300' da? full weight + a couple pair of womens' shoes and outfits..don't ask.

853 heads, 90k miles. stock everything. i think people look for a scapegoat in their poorly set up car and fall on the flowmaster or their NON flowmaster y merge.

i'd guess the tune is the culprit as it is 99% of the time.
Old 06-27-2011, 09:09 PM
  #16  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
TA1364's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I am going to go with converter issuse
Old 06-27-2011, 09:39 PM
  #17  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
silver50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ssdeuce74
did they say what caused the knock retard was something loose making noise or just a bad sensor.
Bad sensor. I think my converter is good. When the car is 12 degrees plus down on timing, I can see why my et's were so bad
Old 06-27-2011, 09:52 PM
  #18  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
ssdeuce74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: crownsville md
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ouch, yeah that makes sense, she should really wake up with 12*
Old 06-29-2011, 10:13 AM
  #19  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
thunderstruck507's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northwest AR
Posts: 8,357
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by s346k
everyone says that **** about ypipes and the flowmaster. i don't buy it at all. if that is the case, how does a stock 99 car with a lid and weld in flowmaster 80 series ONLY trap 88 in the 1/8 @ 2300' da? full weight + a couple pair of womens' shoes and outfits..don't ask.

853 heads, 90k miles. stock everything. i think people look for a scapegoat in their poorly set up car and fall on the flowmaster or their NON flowmaster y merge.

i'd guess the tune is the culprit as it is 99% of the time.
Sorry but I've seen 2 cars in person pick up by ditching the flowmaster. Running good doesn't mean it might not run better. And they definitely sound a lot better...flowmaster chambered mufflers on duals sound great, but the catback style 1 in 2 out crap sounds horrible IMHO.

Some cars are really picky about exhaust flow...my car picked up by removing the tails. It now loses less than .5 mph in the 1/4 mile running capped instead of open cutouts.
Old 06-29-2011, 04:33 PM
  #20  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
s346k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: johnson co.
Posts: 3,433
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

what sensor op?

and how did you find out that was the issue?


Quick Reply: my ET's dont match my mods?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:38 AM.