Congrats W2W - First Gen III in the 6s!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-16-2005, 08:55 AM
  #21  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
Thread Starter
iTrader: (38)
 
Nine Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 32,987
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by S8ER95Z
Does this count? Doesnt look like a full framed 4th gen to me. Not trying to take away from the accomplishment at all but I didnt think a tube chasis car was what everyone else was using.
The Australian crew had a tube chassis UTE, Hardcore is using a tube chassis GTO. You won't find any stock frame cars running 6s like this, its not safe.

Denom, any Modular Mustang bodied cars in the 6s? Mihovetz was using a smaller Cougar body: http://www.accufabracing.com
Old 08-16-2005, 11:14 AM
  #22  
TECH Addict
 
bad95killer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Somewhere I Belong
Posts: 2,906
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Congrats Kurt & W2W crew w/o any exciption

6's @ over 200 what an accomplishment guys

good luck W2W folks !!!

peace
Old 08-16-2005, 12:20 PM
  #23  
6600 rpm clutch dump of death Administrator
 
J-Rod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,983
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

congrats... Great work...
Old 08-16-2005, 12:33 PM
  #24  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
The Juggernaut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago,IL
Posts: 2,516
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Nice Job, Kurt!
Old 08-16-2005, 01:19 PM
  #25  
TECH Addict
 
Elite_Hot_Rod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lewisville, Texas
Posts: 2,319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That's amazing guys, congrats to W2W what an accomplishment. Question, who was driving it and where's the's the video?
Old 08-16-2005, 01:49 PM
  #26  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
DONAIMIAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NW Houston, TX
Posts: 10,036
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

damn thats moving.
Old 08-16-2005, 02:14 PM
  #27  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
cantdrv65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: TEXASS
Posts: 3,202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Wow! Congrats! Care to share an estimate of power made by that beast?
Old 08-16-2005, 02:46 PM
  #28  
TECH Enthusiast
 
TanRchy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pismo Beach, CA
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thats bad ***. Great job W2W! 6's, wow...
Old 08-16-2005, 03:25 PM
  #29  
On The Tree
 
00Pontiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

congrats! I would love to see a video too
Old 08-16-2005, 04:22 PM
  #30  
Launching!
 
ChevyGoldfinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NV
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 00Pontiac
congrats! I would love to see a video too
Here you go.

6.86 Pass http://www.w2wpowertrain.com/images_...r_6.86_run.wmv

7.43 Pass http://www.w2wpowertrain.com/images_....43_Casper.MPG
Old 08-16-2005, 05:27 PM
  #31  
TECH Regular
 
Rob Valden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thats hauling *** no doubt and bad *** for an ls1. But what i think is more impressive is the outlaw 10.5 cars. Look at Petty/Lynch and ToDD Moyer, they have both been bottom 6.90's 200 + "moyer 209" and thats at 3000 pds, and with a 33 10.5 W not a 33 X17...I just think that its more impressive watching a more street car go damn near the same numbers in a much harder condition..

Rob
Old 08-16-2005, 05:32 PM
  #32  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (6)
 
bad0211secws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: mayville,mi
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

that is amazing with only 352cuin what is the difference as far as weight and the way the body is built compared to ronnie duke's car?
Old 08-17-2005, 08:00 AM
  #33  
SSU Moderator
 
RyanJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Ronnie Duke's new car? The GTO? Both complete tube-frame 4-link cars. I think they both weigh pretty close to 3000lbs.
Old 08-17-2005, 11:57 AM
  #34  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (6)
 
bad0211secws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: mayville,mi
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RyanJ
Ronnie Duke's new car? The GTO? Both complete tube-frame 4-link cars. I think they both weigh pretty close to 3000lbs.
i didnt know he had a new car.so is the gto going to be replacing the t/a?
Old 08-17-2005, 12:21 PM
  #35  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
1fastWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by ChevyGoldfinger

I just came in my pants... LOVE the in car camera!


There is no comparison to Ronnie Duke's convert. T/A to Casper. Ronnie's started as a GM production car and Casper was born from a pile of tubing. 6's are impressive nonetheless especially from 352 cubes.
Old 08-17-2005, 12:49 PM
  #36  
427
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Clayton, North Carolina
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Casper was born from a LT1 Z-28 production car that was totaled in a accident. It still has the stock vin number in the dash. It would be interesting to run a Carfax report on it! It did end up with some massive cutting and tube installed!! We weighed it today. 2875 with a driver.

Kurt
Originally Posted by 1fastWS6
I just came in my pants... LOVE the in car camera!


There is no comparison to Ronnie Duke's convert. T/A to Casper. Ronnie's started as a GM production car and Casper was born from a pile of tubing. 6's are impressive nonetheless especially from 352 cubes.
Old 08-17-2005, 01:34 PM
  #37  
SSU Moderator
 
RyanJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bad0211secws6
i didnt know he had a new car.so is the gto going to be replacing the t/a?
Ronnie Duke has:

a blue TA conv. - the one that went low eights years ago with a W2W-built combo
a black TA t-top - the one what supposedly went 7's a few months ago (bullshit) with a new "combo", but it basically is a copy of the W2W set up (intake, distributor, etc.) Impressive that it ran low eights either way though.
a full-blown tube-frame "GTO" (GTO 'glass copy-body on a tube frame cert'd with a min. weight of 2800lbs) - it went 7.1x this month with an F2R or F3R or something and some kind of LSx combo I can't remember if its C5R stuff, but it probably is.

Casper (as you read) was a 'real' car, now a tube-frame job. It has been all up in 'street car' racing for 15+ years and at one point I think it had 4 large frame turbo's before they outlawed it.
Old 08-17-2005, 02:04 PM
  #38  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
1fastWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by 427
Casper was born from a LT1 Z-28 production car that was totaled in a accident. It still has the stock vin number in the dash. It would be interesting to run a Carfax report on it! It did end up with some massive cutting and tube installed!! We weighed it today. 2875 with a driver.

Kurt
I stand corrected.....the cars like that always amaze me because there is such a tiny part of an original production car left. I always wonder why the owner didn't just start with a tube chassis car, but then I think of the progression of my cars and realize that sometimes they end up that way after years of trying to go faster and faster.
Old 08-17-2005, 04:56 PM
  #39  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (6)
 
bad0211secws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: mayville,mi
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thing is w2w is only using 352 vs dukes 427
Old 08-17-2005, 05:38 PM
  #40  
427
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Clayton, North Carolina
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

In this case it was the NMCA rules at the time the car was built. All cars had to start life as a production car with vin number. It would have been cheaper to start with factory quarters and roof panel. In the late 90's they did change the rules to allow panel cars, which are lighter and can be lower to the ground.
I had built the engine to run in a tech class. When it was not able to do that, I borrowed this car from a friend to test the limits of the engine. The engine has some head gasket problems but overall has been durable. Looks like it is going to need rings, but it has all my dyno testing and runs on the first set.




Kurt
Originally Posted by 1fastWS6
I stand corrected.....the cars like that always amaze me because there is such a tiny part of an original production car left. I always wonder why the owner didn't just start with a tube chassis car, but then I think of the progression of my cars and realize that sometimes they end up that way after years of trying to go faster and faster.


Quick Reply: Congrats W2W - First Gen III in the 6s!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:24 PM.