Header only T/A traps 114.54mph
#81
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (28)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
But a good driver, free mod m6 car can trap 108-110. I don't see a car with a lid, and full exhust going slower then 112. Not stupid stuff, the car sounds like its setup good. Pacesetters, ORY, magnaflow catback, no front sway, rear seat, spare, MT DRs.
I just read page 2-3-4 I dono about the 27 backhalf, that is a lot. I see what you mean chris, 22...... 24 is a great running, stock cam m6. And on a 1.7 and the weather. I see what your saying. Sure you didn't mean to type 89.27
Whats a slip of the other guys on here that day? Or the other runs? Might just be one lane shows 1/8 slower trap, 1/4 a little high?
Header only T/A traps 114.54mph =
![Mr. Cool](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_cool.gif)
27 backhalf on the 1st post info=
![Rolleyes](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/rolleyes.gif)
Last edited by studderin; 07-05-2008 at 05:29 AM.
#82
9 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
My ol' lady's 01 SS has headers, lid, tune and has went 12.56 @ 113
Oh yea, it's an AUTO!
It was in about 35 degree weather 2 years ago. It also made 353 rwhp, 364 rwtq I posted this a long time ago in the Dyno section and had alot of non believers till some of the locals that witnessed it posted up.
Oh yea, it's an AUTO!
It was in about 35 degree weather 2 years ago. It also made 353 rwhp, 364 rwtq I posted this a long time ago in the Dyno section and had alot of non believers till some of the locals that witnessed it posted up.
#83
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (33)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
My ol' lady's 01 SS has headers, lid, tune and has went 12.56 @ 113
Oh yea, it's an AUTO!
It was in about 35 degree weather 2 years ago. It also made 353 rwhp, 364 rwtq I posted this a long time ago in the Dyno section and had alot of non believers till some of the locals that witnessed it posted up.
Oh yea, it's an AUTO!
It was in about 35 degree weather 2 years ago. It also made 353 rwhp, 364 rwtq I posted this a long time ago in the Dyno section and had alot of non believers till some of the locals that witnessed it posted up.
An auto making the same power to the wheels as an M6 will always be faster. He left harder so he 60'ed better and got marginally better ETs but you had more MPH in the 1/8 and less in the 1/4.
Compare the slips you gain on him the whole way nearly tying at the finish line but some how he has .95 MPH more than you. How could you have ran that down?
Not only that but his previous best was 12.79 @ 109 and with only the removal of his sway bar picked up 2 tenths and 5 mph. The reduction in ET should have caused less MPH if anything.
Jon
#84
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: WALDORF MD
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Ok, that's fast. For whatever reason your making as much power to the wheels as the OP should be making, and it was decent weather.
An auto making the same power to the wheels as an M6 will always be faster. He left harder so he 60'ed better and got marginally better ETs but you had more MPH in the 1/8 and less in the 1/4.
Compare the slips you gain on him the whole way nearly tying at the finish line but some how he has .95 MPH more than you. How could you have ran that down?
Not only that but his previous best was 12.79 @ 109 and with only the removal of his sway bar picked up 2 tenths and 5 mph. The reduction in ET should have caused less MPH if anything.
Jon
An auto making the same power to the wheels as an M6 will always be faster. He left harder so he 60'ed better and got marginally better ETs but you had more MPH in the 1/8 and less in the 1/4.
Compare the slips you gain on him the whole way nearly tying at the finish line but some how he has .95 MPH more than you. How could you have ran that down?
Not only that but his previous best was 12.79 @ 109 and with only the removal of his sway bar picked up 2 tenths and 5 mph. The reduction in ET should have caused less MPH if anything.
Jon
#86
12 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Fredericksburg,VA
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I ran there the same day. 4 runs, 3 in the right lane, 1 in the left. I think he was always running in the right lane (tower side). All my runs were nearly identical. ET and MPH didn't vary between the two lanes. The air was terrible as it was hot and humid. I ran between 13.08 and 13.19 all between 105-106 mph. Better air would have gotten me a 12.9X and maybe another 1-2 mph. I didn't notice a cam by the idle, but like someone posted, you wouldn't hear an LS6 cam anyway. I video taped one run, but he spun bad off the line and ran a low 13 at 113. I can post it, but I don't see how it would help prove or disprove anything.
#87
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Well I took my car to the track yesterday(me driving), didn't do as good as procsls6. I out weigh him by about 50to60lbs and I had a 1/2 a tank of gas and it was very humid. My first pass the car was hot I ran a 12.75@112.49 with a 1.887 60'. I drove 60miles went straight to tech and made the fisrt pass never shut the car off. Not bad
#88
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
exactly and then you find out it also has SLP intake,y-pipe,catback,m/t's,i think some weight reduction and who knows what else
#93
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
he still has 1.5mph or 15rwhp on you and it was 90* weather...just a little to much man plus the 1/8 to 1/4 dont add up...my guess is that if he is telling the truth it has a small ls6 cam that he doesnt know about...other wise with full bolt ons and cool - da air he will be in the 120mph range at close to full weight
#94
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I was there too, Some of you must understand that MIR (Maryland International Raceway) is one of the Best tracks in the area, it has the best air around and the track prep is by far the best. at less that 100 ft asl and always has a nice river breaze that keeps humidity down.
I also ran my Best there (12.41 @ 109.35) 1.845 60ft on 275/40 17 BFG DR's
Stock Tranny and Motor just Bolt-ons.
The OP Car was running like clock work it was awesome to witness..
I do not know him and never met him so no bias here.
I also ran my Best there (12.41 @ 109.35) 1.845 60ft on 275/40 17 BFG DR's
Stock Tranny and Motor just Bolt-ons.
The OP Car was running like clock work it was awesome to witness..
I do not know him and never met him so no bias here.
#95
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: WALDORF MD
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I was there too, Some of you must understand that MIR (Maryland International Raceway) is one of the Best tracks in the area, it has the best air around and the track prep is by far the best. at less that 100 ft asl and always has a nice river breaze that keeps humidity down.
I also ran my Best there (12.41 @ 109.35) 1.845 60ft on 275/40 17 BFG DR's
Stock Tranny and Motor just Bolt-ons.
The OP Car was running like clock work it was awesome to witness..
I do not know him and never met him so no bias here.
I also ran my Best there (12.41 @ 109.35) 1.845 60ft on 275/40 17 BFG DR's
Stock Tranny and Motor just Bolt-ons.
The OP Car was running like clock work it was awesome to witness..
I do not know him and never met him so no bias here.
Thanks, I wish I would have meet you, did you have a mustangforum.com sticker on your car? If so I think I saw you. I
#96
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
http://www.rygen.net/stang/
#97
TECH Addict
iTrader: (11)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Were there record setting passes the night that you were there? Do you think that electronics are always right? Just because it's right most of the time, don't mean it's right all of the time. **** does happen, I have had runs that I know are not right, but it showed up on my timeslips, and I continue to tell those results. I just wouldn't argue against if it were in question.
Jon
Jon
#98
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
am i understanding that 114mph is to high of a speed when running a 12.5 to 12.6?
The reason I ask is because i ran a 86mph in the 1/8 and 13.16 @ 110.13 in the 1/4
thats with a 60ft of 2.02
Stock gears, stock automatic tranny, stock everything motor, stock exhaust manifold, flowmaster exaust with y-pipe no cats...yes stock air lid....
The reason I ask is because i ran a 86mph in the 1/8 and 13.16 @ 110.13 in the 1/4
thats with a 60ft of 2.02
Stock gears, stock automatic tranny, stock everything motor, stock exhaust manifold, flowmaster exaust with y-pipe no cats...yes stock air lid....
#99
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
am i understanding that 114mph is to high of a speed when running a 12.5 to 12.6?
The reason I ask is because i ran a 86mph in the 1/8 and 13.16 @ 110.13 in the 1/4
thats with a 60ft of 2.02
Stock gears, stock automatic tranny, stock everything motor, stock exhaust manifold, flowmaster exaust with y-pipe no cats...yes stock air lid....
The reason I ask is because i ran a 86mph in the 1/8 and 13.16 @ 110.13 in the 1/4
thats with a 60ft of 2.02
Stock gears, stock automatic tranny, stock everything motor, stock exhaust manifold, flowmaster exaust with y-pipe no cats...yes stock air lid....
#100
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Me personally I dont see how my car hits 110 and only ran a 13.1... or is that normal?