Drag Racing Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Suspension Unloading At Launch..? (Vids)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 18, 2009 | 01:32 PM
  #41  
1BADAIR's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,902
Likes: 1
From: oxford, Michigan
Default

i couldn't get the car to work using the driveshaft method.
I have about 4degrees on the lca i think
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2009 | 03:04 PM
  #42  
Mikey 97Z M6's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,046
Likes: 3
From: Vancouver, WA
Default

Originally Posted by 1BADAIR
lowering the front of the arm will lift more weight and hit the tires softer.
I thought that raising the front of the torque arm will put the IC out further and softening the hit on the tires and keeping the suspension loaded. By lowering the front of the arm (back where it used to be) it would essentially shorten up my IC and hit the tires too quick and hard like my videos I posted. ? Now I'm confused lol...

I guess I'll find out tonight if the t/a adjustments do any good or not. Going to try lowering the tire pressure in increments also.

Mike
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2009 | 03:49 PM
  #43  
studderin's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,556
Likes: 6
From: Rochester, NY
Default

get some good front shocks!!!!
strange or afcos!!!!!

Your wasting you time tring to adjust **** and "dial" anything it with no weight transfer

Last edited by studderin; Sep 22, 2009 at 06:55 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2009 | 04:34 PM
  #44  
tomz28's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,813
Likes: 0
From: Saline, MI
Default

bro i have a 2-step it is a must for a m6 car so much better out of the hole
i cut .2 of my 60 foot
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2009 | 04:56 PM
  #45  
FASTFATBOY's Avatar
TECH Veteran
20 Year Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,861
Likes: 2
From: Mobile Ala
Default

Ride height dont mean **** as far as making a car hook, you need no more than 1/2 to 3/4 of rake front to rear. And LCA brackets on the car, with the LCA running uphill from the rear to the car.

My car is on the ground and pulls low 1.40's on the motor. Footbraking with a converter thats too tight.


You need some shocks on the car, some double adjustables on the rear and at least some single adjustables on the front.

When my car does that I tighten up the fronts to slow the rise down and it works the tire harder.

Set the rears full stiff on compression, mid way on extension.

Put the fronts mid way to start.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2009 | 05:34 PM
  #46  
lemons12's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 2
From: Winchester, TN
Default

Are my rer shocks good enough?
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2009 | 01:09 PM
  #47  
Mikey 97Z M6's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,046
Likes: 3
From: Vancouver, WA
Default

Well I went to the track last night and learned a ton. I had my friend Cody (long time racer) go with me and gave me some good pointers for doing the burnout and also helped line me up in some good spots on the starting line.

Anyway, made some improvements, but not huge improvements. I think the biggest improvement I could see from the video is that the tires aren'te being hit nearly as violently as they were before, so changing the IC definitely helped in some regard. I'll try posting up the vids in a day or two.

Got a new best 60' time of 1.68 which was an aborted run after missing 3rd gear, and then the car ran a best of 11.25 with a 1.71 60'. Again, not huge gains but please remember there is NO TRACK PREP. No VHT is being put down at all. To add insult to injury, they scraped the track earlier in the week so there were bald spots all over.

After all this, I'm now 100% sure that a front drag shock is the answer to getting the car to hook any better than it is now. Even with good track preparation, I don't think the car would hook a whole lot better without the front drag shocks.

Thanks for all the suggestions and help, I appreciate it.

Mike
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2009 | 02:22 PM
  #48  
Nimitz87's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,449
Likes: 0
From: Cooper City, FL
Default

Nice mike glad your figuring it out, and your right the drag shocks will make a world of difference...there is an article floating around about putting qa1's on a car and the difference it made was pretty nuts....

Chad
Reply
LS1 Tech Stories

The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

story-0

Topdon ONE vs. Artidiag 800 BT2: Which is the Diagnostic Tablet For You?

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-1

Gas Monkey Built a 6-Wheel Ferrari Testarossa With a Corvette LT4 Engine

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

7 Most Reliable High-Performance Engines GM Has Ever Built

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-5

Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-7

Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

 
story-8

Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Sep 19, 2009 | 09:02 PM
  #49  
studderin's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,556
Likes: 6
From: Rochester, NY
Default

Originally Posted by mikey 97z m6

after all this, i'm now 100% sure that a front drag shock is the answer to getting the car to hook any better than it is now. Even with good track preparation, i don't think the car would hook a whole lot better without the front drag shocks.
:d:d:d
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2009 | 12:35 PM
  #50  
Mikey 97Z M6's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,046
Likes: 3
From: Vancouver, WA
Default

Thanks Chad, I just wish I had the funds to get the shocks this year so I could find out what the car can really do.

Studderin, yeah yeah yeah,,,,, you told me so lol...

Mike
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2009 | 01:34 PM
  #51  
danhr's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 447
Likes: 1
From: Ford City, PA
Default

imo you're problem is weight transfer. you just aren't getting any. you aren't getting too much, if any squat in the rear, which is a good thing. but your rear is loading, then unloading, then loading again. I would def. opt for a better shock/spring in the front as a starting point. I'm a junkyard/budget man myself, and would first try out a set of v-6 springs/shocks in the front (preferably from a 3.4L, they have the lowest spring rate). That would help A LOT. You can get a set dirt cheap from a junkyard or a pull a part, seeing how they don't take too long to pull off.

If you want to shell out some change, get a set of qa1 12 way adjustables with whatever spring to your liking/application. I would highly suggest AGAINST getting the 24 way adjustables. 24 ways just have way too many combinations to get it dialed in, and if you aren't very suspension competant, you have a better chance of dialing it worse than you could with a set of 12 ways.

Tire pressure is fine. I wouldn't drop it. Your suspicions of wanting to lower your tire pressure because it's spinning is just because your rear end is becoming unloaded and isn't applying all the initial weight from when you first leave the line. Dropping your tire pressure will just make you bog off the line really bad and lower et a good bit and your lower your mph even more. A good rule of thumb that i've always used is that in bias plies, you want to run the most PSI possible, without spinning.

You definetly need to launch higher than 4000 rpms too imho. Launching higher will help "carry" your car through the 60'. You are dropping way too low below your powerband out of the hole, giving you less weight transfer. Especially with those 3.89's. I wouldn't even dream of trying to put a taller tire on your car with those gears. If traction becomes an issue, I would opt for a 26x11.5x15, before stepping up to a 27 or 28" tall tire. You need as much gear as you can get with a manual and 3.89's.

Your car seems to be launching fairly straight, so I wouldn't say a drag bar is NEEDED. It will most certainly help. the drag bar will help preload the suspension and take some of that initial hit off. Since launching straight isn't your problem, but preloading is, I wouldn't even bother trying to use the common practice of band-aid-ing it with a drag bag.

I would try replacing the shocks in the front, try a bit of a bigger burnout (didn't seem like you heated them enough in the videos), maintain the same psi in the tires, and launch @ around 5000 rpms.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2009 | 01:45 PM
  #52  
danhr's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 447
Likes: 1
From: Ford City, PA
Default

Originally Posted by lemons12
those sixty times are good enough to get air arent they?
slow cars can't lift tires

seriously though... your front end is just waayy too heavy (you have a iron block don't you?). and 60' times and power have NOTHING to do with lifting tire(s). Look at my old setup against Tim's old setup. I had a 224 cam only and could cut something as bad as a 1.7 60' and still lift both tires. and tim with the trex'ed h/c car would cut 1.5's and he couldn't. Lifting tires is about getting your suspension to work, weight transfer, not having a fat *** car, etc.

Anyways.. the front of your car is too fat... because I'm assuming you have stock wheels on the front and because of the iron block. That's for starters. What's your pinion angle? The greater it is, the harder it pushes the rear end down. Also knowing whether or not you have a full length or short torque arm will help. lol.

and your rear shocks are plenty good enough. hell if you don't like them, I will straight up trade you my lakewood 50/50's for yours , and I've pulled the wheels countless times on mine.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2009 | 04:38 PM
  #53  
lemons12's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 2
From: Winchester, TN
Default

Originally Posted by danhr
slow cars can't lift tires

seriously though... your front end is just waayy too heavy (you have a iron block don't you?). and 60' times and power have NOTHING to do with lifting tire(s). Look at my old setup against Tim's old setup. I had a 224 cam only and could cut something as bad as a 1.7 60' and still lift both tires. and tim with the trex'ed h/c car would cut 1.5's and he couldn't. Lifting tires is about getting your suspension to work, weight transfer, not having a fat *** car, etc.

Anyways.. the front of your car is too fat... because I'm assuming you have stock wheels on the front and because of the iron block. That's for starters. What's your pinion angle? The greater it is, the harder it pushes the rear end down. Also knowing whether or not you have a full length or short torque arm will help. lol.

and your rear shocks are plenty good enough. hell if you don't like them, I will straight up trade you my lakewood 50/50's for yours , and I've pulled the wheels countless times on mine.
I know, I'm trying to cheat the system here!

Block is aluminum..

Last two times I went to the track I had stock 16s on the front.
Don't know what my pinion angle is.. Don't know ANYTHING about suspension.. I'm going to read up a little bit tonight on it though..

I think I will keep my rear shocks..
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2009 | 09:34 PM
  #54  
ty_ty13's Avatar
7 Second Club
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,558
Likes: 0
From: paducah, ky
Default

if you car is lowered much at all look at the back of the trans tunnel where the TA bolts to the rear and make sure its not binding and hitting the tunnel and causing your car to act like it is...
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2009 | 09:59 PM
  #55  
1BADAIR's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,902
Likes: 1
From: oxford, Michigan
Default

if the car came with 17's and is lowered check the bumpstops.
I had to remove the extenders on mine to get the car to hook before I figured out i needed front shocks.
I used to run the rear really soft to compensate for the front but it would bounce off the bumpstop and blow the tires off
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2009 | 01:44 PM
  #56  
Mikey 97Z M6's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,046
Likes: 3
From: Vancouver, WA
Default

Originally Posted by danhr
If you want to shell out some change, get a set of qa1 12 way adjustables with whatever spring to your liking/application. I would highly suggest AGAINST getting the 24 way adjustables. 24 ways just have way too many combinations to get it dialed in, and if you aren't very suspension competant, you have a better chance of dialing it worse than you could with a set of 12 ways.
I just ordered up a set of Strange single adjustables with Hyperco 275lb springs. After doing some research, the Strange shocks seemed to have less issues with seals leaking etc... Also, I liked the idea that the Strange shocks only adjust the extension and the compression remains the same regardless of the setting.

Originally Posted by danhr

Tire pressure is fine. I wouldn't drop it. Your suspicions of wanting to lower your tire pressure because it's spinning is just because your rear end is becoming unloaded and isn't applying all the initial weight from when you first leave the line. Dropping your tire pressure will just make you bog off the line really bad and lower et a good bit and your lower your mph even more. A good rule of thumb that i've always used is that in bias plies, you want to run the most PSI possible, without spinning.
I agree with running the same tire pressure. After trying it as low as 9.5 psi, it was just too low and got real squirelly after every shift. It also spun the right rear tire on the wheel about 1" of movement. Also, my trap speed dropped down to low 123mph compared to upper 124mph from the weekend before.

Originally Posted by danhr
You definetly need to launch higher than 4000 rpms too imho. Launching higher will help "carry" your car through the 60'. You are dropping way too low below your powerband out of the hole, giving you less weight transfer. Especially with those 3.89's. I wouldn't even dream of trying to put a taller tire on your car with those gears. If traction becomes an issue, I would opt for a 26x11.5x15, before stepping up to a 27 or 28" tall tire. You need as much gear as you can get with a manual and 3.89's.
Believe me, I wish I could launch higher. I did try launching at 5k last weekend, but it just blew the tires off. 4500 seems to be the limit until the new shocks go on the front. I wish I could go with higher gears, but the 3.89's are just about perfect as far as rpm's through the traps. I'm just about bumping the rev limiter through the traps with the 3.89's.

Originally Posted by danhr
Your car seems to be launching fairly straight, so I wouldn't say a drag bar is NEEDED. It will most certainly help. the drag bar will help preload the suspension and take some of that initial hit off. Since launching straight isn't your problem, but preloading is, I wouldn't even bother trying to use the common practice of band-aid-ing it with a drag bag.

I would try replacing the shocks in the front, try a bit of a bigger burnout (didn't seem like you heated them enough in the videos), maintain the same psi in the tires, and launch @ around 5000 rpms.
I think once the front drag shocks are installed, the need for a drag bar will become more apparent. The video I posted earlier in this thread is from hot-lapping the car, so I wasn't doing a big monster burnout. The tires were already pretty well warmed up. Thanks for all the suggestions.

Mike
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2009 | 01:47 PM
  #57  
Mikey 97Z M6's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,046
Likes: 3
From: Vancouver, WA
Default

Originally Posted by 1BADAIR
if the car came with 17's and is lowered check the bumpstops.
I had to remove the extenders on mine to get the car to hook before I figured out i needed front shocks.
I used to run the rear really soft to compensate for the front but it would bounce off the bumpstop and blow the tires off
The bumpstops are long gone but thanks for the suggestion.

Strange front single adjustables on the way.....

Mike
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2009 | 06:08 PM
  #58  
Nimitz87's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,449
Likes: 0
From: Cooper City, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Mikey 97Z M6
The bumpstops are long gone but thanks for the suggestion.

Strange front single adjustables on the way.....

Mike
Nice, awesome that your getting them this season to see what you can do...it should make a drastic difference.

Chad
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2009 | 10:17 PM
  #59  
Mikey 97Z M6's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,046
Likes: 3
From: Vancouver, WA
Default

Originally Posted by Nimitz87
Nice, awesome that your getting them this season to see what you can do...it should make a drastic difference.

Chad
I'm hoping so man. It would be soooo nice to get a 10 second time slip out of her this year.

Mike
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2009 | 01:20 PM
  #60  
Mikey 97Z M6's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,046
Likes: 3
From: Vancouver, WA
Default

Update:

I got the Strange single adj front shocks installed and they are most definitely helping. I ran a new personal best et and mph last night. I'm not just knocking on the door of the 10's, I'm banging on the f*(ker.

60' - 1.66
1/8 et - 7.111
1/8 mph - 99.22
1/4 et 11.03
1/4 mph 125.55

Also backed it up with an 11.09 @ 124.98.

The car seemed to like setting 3 on the front shocks (1 being lightest, 10 being stiffest). I'm going to try resetting the front of the torque arm back down one hole the next time I head out and see if the rear suspension will stay loaded now with the new front shocks. Our video camera freaked out so I didn't get this run on video, but I should have the 11.09 run uploaded in a day or so.

Mike
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:34 AM.

story-0
Topdon ONE vs. Artidiag 800 BT2: Which is the Diagnostic Tablet For You?

Slideshow: We take a close look at the ONE and Artidiag 800BT2 diagnostic tools from Topdon and the reasons to buy one over the other.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-28 11:05:11


VIEW MORE
story-1
Gas Monkey Built a 6-Wheel Ferrari Testarossa With a Corvette LT4 Engine

Slideshow: The controversial Ferrari F6 swaps its original flat-12 for a Corvette Z06-derived LT4 V8 and sends power to four rear wheels through a custom-built drivetrain.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-26 18:23:54


VIEW MORE
story-2
7 Most Reliable High-Performance Engines GM Has Ever Built

Slideshow:These GM engines didn't just make huge power, they survived abuse, boost, track days, and six-digit mileage with a reputation for refusing to quit.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-21 16:45:27


VIEW MORE
story-3
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

Slideshow: This heavily modified 1971 Camaro mixes classic muscle car styling with a fifth-generation Camaro interior and modern LS3 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:06:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

Slideshow: From wobbling harmonic balancers to failed EBCMs, these are the issues that define long-term C5 ownership and what repairs typically involve.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-07 18:44:57


VIEW MORE
story-5
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

Slideshow: A modern Camaro transformed into a retro icon, this limited-run "Bandit" build blends nostalgia with brute force in a way few revivals manage.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:57:02


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

Slideshow: Cadillac didn't just crash the high-performance luxury vehicle party, it showed up loud, supercharged, and occasionally a little unhinged...

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-04-16 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

Slideshow: Top ten most powerful Chevy trucks ever made

By | 2026-03-25 09:22:26


VIEW MORE
story-8
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

Slideshow: Hennessey has turned the Silverado ZR2 into a 700-hp off-road monster with supercharged V8 power and a limited production run.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-24 18:57:52


VIEW MORE
story-9
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

Slideshow: A one-off sports car that looks like a vintage Italian exotic-but hides a C6 Corvette underneath-just sold for the price of a new mid-engine Corvette.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-23 18:53:41


VIEW MORE