Drag Racing Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Should I switch to a TH400?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-14-2009, 08:32 PM
  #61  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
MetallicaMatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sandusky, Ohio
Posts: 3,155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

2nd pass video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dD8NfvA9TK0

no burnout vid
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SdknceJCSg
Old 10-14-2009, 08:39 PM
  #62  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
MetallicaMatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sandusky, Ohio
Posts: 3,155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

just to show you how rich it got when it got cold, i backfired a few times off the line on my last run
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RNBOh7WJBPc

I know it's dumping fuel when it's on the 2 step, but that's the first backfire off the line
Old 10-14-2009, 09:08 PM
  #63  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
BADD SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Baldwin, NY
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by MetallicaMatt
12.2, exactly why i'm a bit pissed at my times. Something doesn't seem right. Wonder how rich it was running, I'll get it back on the dyno in the spring.

I shift at 6000 that day. rev limiter at 6500 - all gears
Thats probably 1 problem, thats a big cam and it peaked at what rpm?

My combo peaks around 64-6500, I shift at 7200.

Always want to shift past peak for the most out of a combo, should you shift at 7200, probably not (i have rodbolts), but definately 6600-6800 easy. And launch HIGHER!!! Also, check out the tire prolem, its under geared.
Old 10-14-2009, 09:11 PM
  #64  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
BADD SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Baldwin, NY
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Gen414
Not really, especially determing weight of car (not sure what his is) but to trap 116 @ 400 RWHP is moving out pretty dang good, for a stock weight FBody (assuming that is what his is)
I disagree, but I think there is alot wrong with alot of the "normal" cars running around tech these days. he is slightly under stock weight I think, 3350 for the car.
Old 10-14-2009, 09:25 PM
  #65  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
MetallicaMatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sandusky, Ohio
Posts: 3,155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

the cam kept making power past 6500 rpms, but the tuner said there was no point in going much past 6700 because the valves start floating in there.


What gearing should I go with? Since I have the 28" tall tires (which someone recommended for a stick car) also, adding the nitrous would determine gear ratio also, correct?
Old 10-14-2009, 09:37 PM
  #66  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
BADD SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Baldwin, NY
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by MetallicaMatt
the cam kept making power past 6500 rpms, but the tuner said there was no point in going much past 6700 because the valves start floating in there.


What gearing should I go with? Since I have the 28" tall tires (which someone recommended for a stick car) also, adding the nitrous would determine gear ratio also, correct?
What valve springs do you have? Was he seeing valve float or just warning of it.....

probably 4.56's n/a or 4.11's sprayed.
Old 10-14-2009, 09:40 PM
  #67  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
MetallicaMatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sandusky, Ohio
Posts: 3,155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

they are Patriot gold - double behive (something like that) - that I got with my MS3 from texas speed

he didn't see float, just was warning.

Maybe i'm thinking he said the lifters start floating - i should probably retract the valve statement
Old 10-14-2009, 09:49 PM
  #68  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (38)
 
Gen414's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Pearland, TX
Posts: 2,309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well again, you are making power (MPH), just not teh ET you need for your MPH.

So, nothing wrong with motor, just need to get the car moving..


Customers car (taking back to track this Friday) but @ 3 weeks ago, he let me drive it...100% street car, full weight Formula, 3520 Lbs with me in it (I go 225), dynoed 39x. On STREET tires, not drag radialsjust regular old 17" street tires, I went 12.90 @ 112 (might have been 111, but think it was 112)

Car has got full UMI treatment (TG Arm, control arms, etc..). Best 60' was a 1.9x (again, can't remember exactly), but again, on street tires. With more practice, and getting used to THAT car, I could have got it into teh 1.80's, again, on street tires.

So, you trapping 112 or so @ 3600 Lbs is about right, jsut need to get teh ET to match.

Since the car is bogging, you have too much tire/not enough gear/not enough launch RPM. A gear is cheaper, AND I like tall tires (like your 28"), so I would swap out gear sets. But, if you ahve a friend that has a set of 26's ou can borrow or you have, throw em on, and see whats up.You should be able to get it into the 12.20's-12.30's or so for 112 MPH trap speed @ 3600lbs
Old 10-14-2009, 09:53 PM
  #69  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
MetallicaMatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sandusky, Ohio
Posts: 3,155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I'll have to call my speed shop, see what a set of gears would cost for my Currie 9" - detroit locker...

4.11's seem to be the good bet for future use as well? That should get me moving off the line fine?

i.e. - I don't want to get 4.11's and go "damn, i should have got 4.___ instead!"
Old 10-15-2009, 05:38 AM
  #70  
Race your car!
iTrader: (50)
 
JL ws-6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,420
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

You put a TH400 in the car and leave off a transbrake at WOT, and have the nitrous come on at the release of the brake and you won't need to change the gears I bet... you'll have more gear then you NEED, but you'll be able to drive it on the street better how it is then how it would be with the optimal track gear.

And just add another 50 hp of jet, trust me it will like the gearing where it is.
Old 10-15-2009, 07:48 AM
  #71  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (17)
 
Kaltech Tuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

My thoughts here are that switching to an automatic isn't going to solve the issues I'm seeing.
The first issue is that if you're not sure if the car is running right GET IT CHECKED!!! If your tune is that far off then not only would it be hurting your et's but maybe hurting the motor.

Shifting at 6000 rpm with a sloppy cam that makes all it's power over that point is absolutely killing you. You may be making 400rwhp on the dyno at 6500 rpm but I bet at 6000 rpm you're probably only making around 385. Shifting at 6000 is dropping you so low into the rpm band that you're probably only making 350 - 360 when you hit the next gear. An automatic won't solve this if you still only shift it at 6000. If they dyno didn't show symptoms of valve float or any other valvetrain issue then I wouldn't worry about spinning it to 6500 or so for the sake of the valvetrain, you'll have to make your own decision about your confidence in the rod bolts at that point. FWIW a properly setup valvetrain with stock lifters and rockers can be stable well over 7000 rpm.

There's a lot of et and mph right there in those 2 issues, should be an easy .4 -.6 and 4 to 6 mph.

Now we can knitpick a little bit. Your shifting isn't terrible from what I could hear in those 2 videos so I wouldn't give up on the 6 speed just yet. I agree that your tire/gear combination is wrong. You essentially have the tire/gear ratio of what you had stock with the stock tires and 3.42's. In order to figure out the proper combination you'll need to determine what your highest mph is going to be after you get things sorted out so if you're bent on nitrous you gotta take that into account. I'd worry about that after you get the other issues sorted out. Hell you can leave off idle right now just to see if the mph comes back then worry about the 60 ft. Assuming about a 1500 DA with the power and weight you say the car has I figure it should trap 116 - 118 with decent driving. Don't give up on the 6 speed yet and let us know how you make out.
Old 10-15-2009, 09:24 AM
  #72  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,697
Received 1,143 Likes on 743 Posts

Default

Here is a 1.48-1.51 on motor:


Here is a 1.38 on 150 shot:


Old 10-15-2009, 09:28 AM
  #73  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,697
Received 1,143 Likes on 743 Posts

Default

First off you have to decide, T56 or TH400. It's a waste of time to discuss both.

If you go TH400, you have to set a goal. Is it high 10's on a 150 shot? That's pretty easy for your setup. I'd keep the 3.90 if you are shifting at 6000. Valve float is more a result of having the wrong valve spring setup. I shifted the white car at 7000, it was a 348 cid, 11:1, 240/244//112 cam, and it made 415rwhp thru a 8" converter on a dynojet. Best mph for me was 123, best mph with a better intake was 126 with the new owner. 150 shot mph was always 133-134. Shifted that at 7000 too.

In your vid #2 the car noses over. Not sure your suspension but I ran QA1 R's up front, and cheap CE's in the back on the 50/50 setting. Stock shocks are 50/50 in back fwiw. Sometimes it's nice to take the rears down to 4/4 if the track is junk.
Old 10-15-2009, 11:31 AM
  #74  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
MetallicaMatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sandusky, Ohio
Posts: 3,155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Kaltech Tuning
My thoughts here are that switching to an automatic isn't going to solve the issues I'm seeing.
The first issue is that if you're not sure if the car is running right GET IT CHECKED!!! If your tune is that far off then not only would it be hurting your et's but maybe hurting the motor.

Shifting at 6000 rpm with a sloppy cam that makes all it's power over that point is absolutely killing you. You may be making 400rwhp on the dyno at 6500 rpm but I bet at 6000 rpm you're probably only making around 385. Shifting at 6000 is dropping you so low into the rpm band that you're probably only making 350 - 360 when you hit the next gear. An automatic won't solve this if you still only shift it at 6000. If they dyno didn't show symptoms of valve float or any other valvetrain issue then I wouldn't worry about spinning it to 6500 or so for the sake of the valvetrain, you'll have to make your own decision about your confidence in the rod bolts at that point. FWIW a properly setup valvetrain with stock lifters and rockers can be stable well over 7000 rpm.

There's a lot of et and mph right there in those 2 issues, should be an easy .4 -.6 and 4 to 6 mph.

Now we can knitpick a little bit. Your shifting isn't terrible from what I could hear in those 2 videos so I wouldn't give up on the 6 speed just yet. I agree that your tire/gear combination is wrong. You essentially have the tire/gear ratio of what you had stock with the stock tires and 3.42's. In order to figure out the proper combination you'll need to determine what your highest mph is going to be after you get things sorted out so if you're bent on nitrous you gotta take that into account. I'd worry about that after you get the other issues sorted out. Hell you can leave off idle right now just to see if the mph comes back then worry about the 60 ft. Assuming about a 1500 DA with the power and weight you say the car has I figure it should trap 116 - 118 with decent driving. Don't give up on the 6 speed yet and let us know how you make out.
I believe the car is running fine, just was really rich because of the weather. She'll be getting a retune in the spring with the nitrous.

At what point do I need to start worrying about the rod bolts? esp. with the spray.

Thanks for the advice and comments. Unfortunately the car is put away for winter (chance of snow tomorrow, already!)
Old 10-15-2009, 11:33 AM
  #75  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
MetallicaMatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sandusky, Ohio
Posts: 3,155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Pro Stock John
First off you have to decide, T56 or TH400. It's a waste of time to discuss both.

If you go TH400, you have to set a goal. Is it high 10's on a 150 shot? That's pretty easy for your setup. I'd keep the 3.90 if you are shifting at 6000. Valve float is more a result of having the wrong valve spring setup. I shifted the white car at 7000, it was a 348 cid, 11:1, 240/244//112 cam, and it made 415rwhp thru a 8" converter on a dynojet. Best mph for me was 123, best mph with a better intake was 126 with the new owner. 150 shot mph was always 133-134. Shifted that at 7000 too.

In your vid #2 the car noses over. Not sure your suspension but I ran QA1 R's up front, and cheap CE's in the back on the 50/50 setting. Stock shocks are 50/50 in back fwiw. Sometimes it's nice to take the rears down to 4/4 if the track is junk.
still unsure about the switch to a TH400 or stay T56.....I'm faced with the cost of doing the conversion - vs. the cost of repairing something that I might break with a missed shift etc.

I've got QA1 shocks all around - 12 way.
2/3 up front
5/5 in the back
Old 10-15-2009, 11:37 AM
  #76  
Race your car!
iTrader: (50)
 
JL ws-6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,420
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

Here's another thought:

Spend the $ on a Th400 swap, sell the T56 and the related parts for probably 2/3 of what a Th400 swap will cost you in total, by the time you are done.... or spend X amount of $ fixing the T56 when it does finally break, then end up spending the $ on a TH400 swap later.....
Old 10-15-2009, 11:55 AM
  #77  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (17)
 
Kaltech Tuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by MetallicaMatt
I believe the car is running fine, just was really rich because of the weather. She'll be getting a retune in the spring with the nitrous.

At what point do I need to start worrying about the rod bolts? esp. with the spray.

Thanks for the advice and comments. Unfortunately the car is put away for winter (chance of snow tomorrow, already!)
It doesn't make any sense for the car to be running pig rich because of the weather if it was tuned properly, that's what we have all these sensors for. Without a wideband we're just taking a guess as to how it was running anyway but a properly tuned car shouldn't change by more than .3 a/f in differing weather conditions.
You have an 02 so you have the upgraded rod bolts over the pre 01 cars so you shouldn't have any issues shifting at 6500-6600 but there's always the "anything's possible" scenario, however I wouldn't worry a whole lot.
I'd say get your car running right on motor before you worry about the spray.

As for the 6 speed vs. auto question you really have to decide what you want the car to be. If you like cruising the car and shifting and you're only gonna go to the track a few times a year then keep the 6 speed. If you want to run your car a lot at the track, get everything out of it that you can, and be real consistent with it then I'd consider the auto swap.
Old 10-15-2009, 02:07 PM
  #78  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
MetallicaMatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sandusky, Ohio
Posts: 3,155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I believe the tune to be okay, and it was back into 'learn mode' since the battery puked out on me. I just charged it up for me to go to the track.

This car will be strip only - except for the 2 mile straight shot to the track.

I bought my C6 and that's a ton of fun rowing the gears in.
Old 10-15-2009, 02:11 PM
  #79  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
MetallicaMatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sandusky, Ohio
Posts: 3,155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JL ws-6
Here's another thought:

Spend the $ on a Th400 swap, sell the T56 and the related parts for probably 2/3 of what a Th400 swap will cost you in total, by the time you are done.... or spend X amount of $ fixing the T56 when it does finally break, then end up spending the $ on a TH400 swap later.....
I'll hold onto the T56, since it's beefed up, and incase I want to switch back down the road.

I just need to get my auto guy to call me back
Old 10-16-2009, 04:13 AM
  #80  
Race your car!
iTrader: (50)
 
JL ws-6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,420
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

In that case, you have only the $ to lose... and it's not even a loss considering the th400 could always be removed and sold.


Quick Reply: Should I switch to a TH400?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:15 PM.