Drag Racing Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

calling studderin and all m6 guys for 60ft help

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-23-2012, 05:05 PM
  #41  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
tyler ovel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 82cetuner
I was very interested to read this since your sixty foot is IDENTICAL to mine, I also run 11.3s at 1.65 sixty at 121mph our cars are very simular exept I got 100 more hp than you LOL but I am also full weight and not the best driver. I run 14psi on the same tires you do with 3.90 gears, I run a 18lb flywheel and I am sure that hurts me, I have found that doing a longer burnout and letting my tires DEADHOOK slow me down, I get my best sixty if I spin some since I have a lighter than stock flywheel. Not sure if this will help you, id love to lower my sixty foot but I run konis and strano springs with a watts link not so sure my setup is ideal for drag racing anyways but I do ok.
Originally Posted by 82cetuner
tyler what I do is I annotate each tire psi and rpm launch on my slips and burnout time to see what works best for me, I think at your HP lvl 11 is way to low, try 14, and play with the burnout time and rpm launch, im sure you will see under a 1.6 I thnk 28s would be way to big a tire for a 6 speed with those gears, I have 3.90s and I barly get into 4th gear down the track as it is
Ive ran the tires at many diferrent psi starting at 18 and working my way down to the 11psi that i run now and that is what seems to hook, the thing is i either spin to much or i bog coming out the whole. that is a good idea about writing the information on the time slip. i understand that you need to spin just a little out the whole and that it will be hard to do that running 11psi but with these tires it seems on my ride, thats what they seem to like. as for the burn out in that video those tires where old and i just wanted to burn them off to install my new ones, i run smaller burn outs now. thanks man

i just looked under the car the other day and my rear lower control arms are goimg up hill so im going to get lower control arm brackets soon to get them in the right position

Originally Posted by 82cetuner
i really want to get my big bitch into the 10s I have the HP, but I definetly need to go on a diet, I really dont want to setup the car for drag only, but I can still remove the front swaybar for some races,
My car i no way shape or form is set up for drag only and i still have some weight reduction. you can take out a lot and still look stock. Good luck with the build
Old 11-23-2012, 05:19 PM
  #42  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (28)
 
studderin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 5,556
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

ya if if the LCA are going uphill you have no IC, to work with how its helping traction. You do going backwards I think? lol
but forward the rear setup never really works, so your probably using that low PSI cuz its all messed up.
Old 11-23-2012, 07:13 PM
  #43  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (11)
 
flintwrench69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mt Morris, Michigan
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HeavyMetl
You're gonna be breaking parts UNTIL you finally get deeper gears. As I was reading this thread I kept thinking "I can't believe he hasn't scattered rearend parts everywhere".

I exploded a 4.11 in my 9" trying to do the same thing you're doing. High gears give you no mechanical advantage. I'm running a 26" Stiff Wall ET Drag, and was hitting the tires crazy hard leaving at 5500-5800rpm. Bad bog, and even though the 60' looked ok, my 330' time was lousy.

I switched to a 4.30, and leaving at a lazy 4500rpm is a 1.62 sixty everytime, but since it eliminated the bog I picked up 3 tenths at the 330'. Plus, the steep gears are way, way easier on parts. Literally, the 1.6X sixty foot feels like a Sunday drive compared to my higher geared "smack the crap outta everything then fall on its face" launches.

If you stick with the high 3.73's, you're gonna keep breaking and you're not gonna get much faster in the 330' time.
A lot of good info in here. I am running the same size tire as you with 4.11s, originally some ET street raidals on ZR1s. Kept breaking loose, decent 60s on a well prepped track but not consistent. Very inconsistent on our local track, prep isnt the best. Went with a 26x11.5x15 ET street bias & got consistent 1.7s on a shitty track, 1.6s on a well prepped track. Much better because of the consistency but expected better 60s. Needed new tires, decided to try the ET drags, in 26x10x15, which is actually the same dimensions as the 11.50 ET street bias, 26.5 tall but 1/2 less tread width, drags 9.8 in compared to 10.3 in. Anyway the drags are a much better tire, I can leave the line at 6-6500 & it dead hooks. My first pass tried 5700 & I felt it bog a lil, I knew that was a good sign. Was running 13-14 psi. Anyway I cut 1.6 60s everytime on the shitty track & got a 1.59 last weekend when I had them at 12 psi. I know I will cut 1.5s on one of the better tracks now. No drag shocks, some Bilsteins, lowering springs, tubular trailing arms, phb, SFCs bolted to a nice backbraced MWC rear w/ spool. I migt have to screw the wheels as the wheels spun on the tire but only happened one day, it moved on the l. rear tire 3 inches. Pretty much full weight minus back seats, A/C compressor & spare tire. Ran 11.5-6s @ 120 last weekend.

Everyone says go with a 28 inch tire, & I am sure it works better but a few reasons why I didnt. 1. Didnt want to alter the car in any way as far as the fenders & wheel wells. 2. I didnt want to lose any gearing, I feel the 4.11s work great with the tire I have on there now but I do cross the line close to 6k so if I sprayed it I would have to do something. I had 3.73s originaly, with the 4.11s I still can get 23 mpg if I want to which blows people away because they think my car is a gas guzzler. They have no clue.
Old 01-28-2013, 08:59 PM
  #44  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
tyler ovel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Little up date. I got the rearend fixed. Moser warranted my wavetrac and axles. I installed the lca brackets today and had them welded in. I also got me a fast 102 intake for Christmas and just installed that as well so we will see if my 60 fts will improve from the brackets. I have to thank my fabricator for adding a coupler to the middle of my stock fuel rails, making them fit and saving me $200. Will have results next week when I'm able to get to the track
Old 01-28-2013, 09:05 PM
  #45  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (26)
 
1961ba427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Milledgeville, GA
Posts: 1,909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Cool....looking forward to the results.
Old 01-30-2013, 02:59 PM
  #46  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
guppymech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,621
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by tyler ovel
Little up date. I installed the lca brackets today and had them welded in.
Did you bolt the lca to the lowest hole on the relocation bracket? The way I understand it with the lca angled down and back the load from the tires/rear pushing the car fwd loads the tires into the track.
Old 01-31-2013, 01:59 PM
  #47  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
tyler ovel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by guppymech
Did you bolt the lca to the lowest hole on the relocation bracket? The way I understand it with the lca angled down and back the load from the tires/rear pushing the car fwd loads the tires into the track.
Na I put it the second hole from the bottom
Old 03-03-2013, 07:15 PM
  #48  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
tyler ovel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

ok so i have a little question for you all. do i put the lower control arms in the bottom wholes of the relocation brackets? I have them in the second whole and they are at 3* but my 60ft hsas not improved at all
Old 03-05-2013, 07:55 AM
  #49  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
htownws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I remember going through this several years ago when I was about 400+ rwhp and full weight. When I ran NA it would bog on the line. Then I would hit it with 100 shot and there was no bog. Once you get a big cam, when you launch it brings the rpms down in a range that the cam is not doing much. And no matter what rpm you launch it does nothing but wear down your clutch much faster. You either need more power or less weight. The cheapest solution is try to get as much weight off your front end as possible. If your willing to live without your AC then take it out, move the battery to the back, ABS delete, etc etc. Or more gear, such as 3.90 or 4.10. Since you have a 6 speed I see no reason why you couldn't go to a 4.10, then take some weight off the front. Its all about weight distribution and sounds like your center of gravity is too far forward. There is no easy solution to that problem.

Last edited by htownws6; 03-05-2013 at 08:00 AM.
Old 03-05-2013, 12:34 PM
  #50  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
tyler ovel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by htownws6
I remember going through this several years ago when I was about 400+ rwhp and full weight. When I ran NA it would bog on the line. Then I would hit it with 100 shot and there was no bog. Once you get a big cam, when you launch it brings the rpms down in a range that the cam is not doing much. And no matter what rpm you launch it does nothing but wear down your clutch much faster. You either need more power or less weight. The cheapest solution is try to get as much weight off your front end as possible. If your willing to live without your AC then take it out, move the battery to the back, ABS delete, etc etc. Or more gear, such as 3.90 or 4.10. Since you have a 6 speed I see no reason why you couldn't go to a 4.10, then take some weight off the front. Its all about weight distribution and sounds like your center of gravity is too far forward. There is no easy solution to that problem.
hey thanks for the info man. I dont have a big cam that has a small power range. my cam is a 222/226 and has an rpm range of 2200-6400. From the readings of my data logger, when i launch at 6507rpm it drops to 4952 rpm so i dont think that im not in my power range. and the car isn't full weight, car is 3407lbs with me in it. A/c has been out same with the abs delete.

and the thing is I dont want more gear. I dont like the fact of almost going into fifth gear and i have seen a couple of F bodys out here that switched the gears to 4.10's and 4.30's and the actually went a tenth slower. and these are pretty consistent drivers so i know its not a driver mod.

Maybe i need qa1's up front to transfer the weight better but my question before was should i put the lower control arms in the BOTTOM whole of the relocation brackets to give me more forward bite?
Old 03-05-2013, 01:11 PM
  #51  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Zmg00camaross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Missouri
Posts: 5,049
Received 47 Likes on 41 Posts

Default

I would try the lowest hole. I was hitting the tires to hard in the lowested hole and bounching back up and unloading the tires. Stock shocks at the time. So give it a try. Some adjustable shocks in front would help get the front up quicker then need rears to keep it there.
Old 03-05-2013, 01:24 PM
  #52  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
htownws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tyler ovel
I dont like the fact of almost going into fifth gear and i have seen a couple of F bodys out here that switched the gears to 4.10's and 4.30's and the actually went a tenth slower. and these are pretty consistent drivers so i know its not a driver mod. ??

Going to a lower gear almost ALWAYS helps you in the 1/4 mile provided your traction is as good and you don't run out of gear at the end. I never heard of anyone going slower with a lower ratio except for those reasons. Have you seen this calculator??

http://www.wallaceracing.com/calcrgr.php

Originally Posted by tyler ovel
Maybe i need qa1's up front to transfer the weight better but my question before was should i put the lower control arms in the BOTTOM whole of the relocation brackets to give me more forward bite?
QA1's will most certainly help, but I'm not convinced will completely cure your problem. As for the relocation bracket question see above post^^
Old 03-06-2013, 09:46 AM
  #53  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
ddnspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 14,599
Received 1,741 Likes on 1,300 Posts

Default

1.5X 60' here. 3800+lb's. My setup:

295/50/16 M/T's on stock wheels, tires set at ~20psi
KYB Adjustable shocks that everyone hates.Fronts full loose, rears set at half
panhard/TA/LCA's with relocations
3.50 rear gear in the 9"
Stock swaybar intact
2 step set at 4k
slip clutch and go.
Old 03-07-2013, 10:38 AM
  #54  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
blue99fbody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i would try lowest hole. i run mine in the lowest hole but my car is also lowered, cant remember or feel like going back to look if yours is or not lol
Old 03-14-2013, 02:16 AM
  #55  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
tyler ovel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Ok so the results are in, the bottom whole worked like a charm. I got my new personal best of 11.126 @ 119. It has more in it. I was bogging all night so I'm going to go new week with more tire pressure.
Old 03-14-2013, 07:02 AM
  #56  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (26)
 
1961ba427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Milledgeville, GA
Posts: 1,909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Congratulations. What was your 60' like?
Old 03-14-2013, 08:25 AM
  #57  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Zmg00camaross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Missouri
Posts: 5,049
Received 47 Likes on 41 Posts

Default

Sweet. Next time start at your air pressure of your personal best and bump it up a half pound increments. You will find that sweet spot to get the tire spinning a couple of revolutions then no bog,better 60ft time and new personal best then the crowd goes wild haha.
Old 03-14-2013, 12:18 PM
  #58  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
tyler ovel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

OTE=1961ba427;17227310]Congratulations. What was your 60' like?[/QUOTE]

Thanks man. 60ft was a 1.58.
Old 03-14-2013, 12:20 PM
  #59  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
tyler ovel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Zmg00camaross
Sweet. Next time start at your air pressure of your personal best and bump it up a half pound increments. You will find that sweet spot to get the tire spinning a couple of revolutions then no bog,better 60ft time and new personal best then the crowd goes wild haha.
Hahahahahahahahaha Thanks for the info man
Old 03-15-2013, 01:47 AM
  #60  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
tyler ovel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

here is a pic of the time slip






Quick Reply: calling studderin and all m6 guys for 60ft help



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:28 AM.