Spring rates
First this is how spring rate is measured. The springs are measured in lbs per inch. An example of this is the QA1 spring for the front os our cars. It is rated at 315 per inch. This means that each inch you compress the spring changes by the rating. 315lb is 315 for the first inch, the second inch would be 630lbs and so on.
We will start with the front.
Most of the 4th gen f-bodies weigh in at 3500 at the high side, the weight bias(front to rear) is usually 54% front 46% rear. This equals 1890lbs front weight. If you run a QA1 spring at 315lbs usually the spring is compressed 5 inches per side. This comes to 3150lbs of spring on the front. NOW comes the trick. The spring shock setup is actually inboard of the spindle on our cars unlike strut front ends. The spring has to actually hold up more weight because of the leverage of the control arms. This comes to 40% more spring to hold up the car. Here lies the problem. The more you compress a spring the more "stored energy" the spring holds. When you launch the spring tries to throw the car up and relieve the stored energy. This ends up being a wheelstand situation if the cars hook.
The way to remedy this situation is to run a softer spring. We normally try a 275 lbs spring compressed to 5.5 inches. This lowers the total weight to 3024lbs BUT the car runs out of stored energy quicker so it will slow a wheelstand down. You could actually put a 225lb. spring on and compess it to 7 inches and hold the car up but kill the weight transfer.
Tightening the shock up on the front will not control the wheelstands as the shocks work to slow to overcome the spring. Only a softer spring or a limiter will control the front end.
Hopefully this will explain some of my spring theories.
With the HAL series "R" strut/shock setup what HAL front spring would you recommend (stock springs and HAL Series "R" shocks in the rear)
Can you get them in a 275 pound setup?
Raceweight around 3500 pounds?
Trending Topics
if the 275's help control the wheelies im glad i didnt get the other ones.
great info brian, thanks
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
First this is how spring rate is measured. The springs are measured in lbs per inch. An example of this is the QA1 spring for the front os our cars. It is rated at 315 per inch. This means that each inch you compress the spring changes by the rating. 315lb is 315 for the first inch, the second inch would be 630lbs and so on.
We will start with the front.
Most of the 4th gen f-bodies weigh in at 3500 at the high side, the weight bias(front to rear) is usually 54% front 46% rear. This equals 1890lbs front weight. If you run a QA1 spring at 315lbs usually the spring is compressed 5 inches per side. This comes to 3150lbs of spring on the front. NOW comes the trick. The spring shock setup is actually inboard of the spindle on our cars unlike strut front ends. The spring has to actually hold up more weight because of the leverage of the control arms. This comes to 40% more spring to hold up the car. Here lies the problem. The more you compress a spring the more "stored energy" the spring holds. When you launch the spring tries to throw the car up and relieve the stored energy. This ends up being a wheelstand situation if the cars hook.
The way to remedy this situation is to run a softer spring. We normally try a 275 lbs spring compressed to 5.5 inches. This lowers the total weight to 3024lbs BUT the car runs out of stored energy quicker so it will slow a wheelstand down. You could actually put a 225lb. spring on and compess it to 7 inches and hold the car up but kill the weight transfer.
Tightening the shock up on the front will not control the wheelstands as the shocks work to slow to overcome the spring. Only a softer spring or a limiter will control the front end.
Hopefully this will explain some of my spring theories.
What happens to the ride height in this scenario? Assume a car is set up with a 315lb front spring. Ride height is adjusted to a given level with the car race ready, driver aboard, just as it is on the starting line. Let's say the crank centerline is 12" from the pavement and, using your numbers, the spring is compressed 5" giving us a spring load of 3150lb.
Now we swap to a 275lb spring.
The downward force applied to the spring is unchanged, the total sum and placement of mass in the front end is the same. The lower spring collars are not moved. Except, now we have a softer rate spring to provide less resistance to hold the weight up. Given the above numbers, this spring willcompress an additional .75", lowering the chassis ride height roughly 1". At this point, the total spring load should be the same, 3150lb.
However, in order to regain our lost ride height, we will need to raise the lower spring platform by .75", thus "preloading" the spring and giving it more "stored energy".
Now the good part. Like you said, it takes 315lb to compress a 315lb spring 1", and it takes 275lb to compress a 275lb spring 1". So, once these springs are compressed a given amount to attain the desirable ride height, the reverse is also true. You will need to remove 315lb from a 315lb spring to extend it 1". You will only need to remove 275lb from 275lb spring to extend it 1".
Which is easier for the suspension to do and which is more likely to wheelstand?
Excellent tech article Brian. We need more info like this on here to make you think about how things work.
Jay
You would have to compress a 275lb spring more to hold the car at the ride height of a 315lb spring. The theory behind going to a lighter spring is that the 275lb. spring will lose stored energy quicker. The 275 will be compressed more initially and hold more stored energy at ride height but once the car starts to extend the front end the spring starts loosing energy.
I just ordered a QA1, 300lb-12'' spring. My truck probably see's a 65-35 front to rear weight ratio of 4100lbs.
To restate the question. What should we look for- A heavier spring to soak up all of the weight-transfer and keep the energy stored?
Thanks,
Kyle
If so you are bringing up a good question. The rear suspension is a different theory. You want enough spring to hold up the vehicle. When you launch the vehicle the rear end is slammed down from spring energy and suspension components. This is where you need a good shock to control the spring and pull the body down with the rearend.
Chris
One thing to remeber is all these rates that I have given so far are for constant rate springs not variable rate like Eibach etc.
It's a drag only 4th gen. I'm gonna assume too that the 2.5 spring is gonna give me more of a selection, even though there might be modifications necessary to make it work right?
Chris
If so you are bringing up a good question. The rear suspension is a different theory. You want enough spring to hold up the vehicle. When you launch the vehicle the rear end is slammed down from spring energy and suspension components. This is where you need a good shock to control the spring and pull the body down with the rearend.
I will be using a QA1 shock, out-back also. I'll have to do some testing to figure out the setting. I got a problem w/ my vehicle. I have a huge weight bias on the drivers side (driver, battery, gas tank-lies parrallel along side), so you get less ware on the passengers side.
Truck literally leans.Do you know if off-set settings of the shock would cause a problem? Need to put more force on the passenger side rear tire.
I'm going way off topic here, sorry about this.
Kyle
If you want, just get them for me and ship them.thanks
..Brady
1966 Chevy II twin turbo LS3 project
2016 Z07 Carbon
Sportside5.3 what rear suspension are you running. Obviously you have dumped the rear leaf springs so I would run a 175 or a 200lbs rear spring on a coilover shock.





