pulled front sway bar and putting v6 springs in
#5
Originally Posted by BubaGumpShrimp
he is talking about launching the car you fool.
With all that weight reduction the swaybar shoudl definatley be out too. Pulling the passenger seat out?
#6
Both should be good for weight transfer, but as stated in other posts, sometimes V6 springs aren't good, because the car doesn't need to come that far down in the rear V6 springs will allow. I have also read that 98+ springs are all the same between V6 and Z28's.
#7
Thats right, 98+ V6 springs are the same rate as V8 springs.
93-97 are a little softer. (hopefully you got these atleast)
93-97 v6 95.4 lbs/in.
93-97 V8 110 lbs/in.
98-02 v6 114 lbs/in.
98-02 v6 114 lbs/in.
93-97 are a little softer. (hopefully you got these atleast)
93-97 v6 95.4 lbs/in.
93-97 V8 110 lbs/in.
98-02 v6 114 lbs/in.
98-02 v6 114 lbs/in.
Trending Topics
#9
Originally Posted by eric01ss
i got the v6 spring from a 95 camaro
I hope they work for ya and aren't TOO soft.
#10
sorry floydsummer, didnt know you were really refering to the v6 springs thinking he paid for springs he already had.. If he did then yea that would be a dumb move but he didnt so all is good...
#11
Back in early 2000, I did !front swaybar and 1995 V6 springs in back.
I went from 1.65 to 1.57, and hooked a little better on mosts passes vs other cars with stock v8 springs out back.
Once we were able to get drag shocks the V6 springs added no value.
I went from 1.65 to 1.57, and hooked a little better on mosts passes vs other cars with stock v8 springs out back.
Once we were able to get drag shocks the V6 springs added no value.