15x8's or 15x10's for the track?
12-22-2005, 06:34 PM
#21
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (35)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Indiana boy
Posts: 4,174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brains
Heavy 
That's the biggest drawback. I haven't weighed them to compare, but it feels almost as heavy as a stock wheel with the 26x10.5 ET street on there. BUT, if you want a set of wheels that is a true "bolt on and go" they work fine.
That's the biggest drawback. I haven't weighed them to compare, but it feels almost as heavy as a stock wheel with the 26x10.5 ET street on there. BUT, if you want a set of wheels that is a true "bolt on and go" they work fine.Brains, you did'nt have to grind anything? Not even the caliper? I have not seen a 15" whell fit with out doing this.
What back spacing were they?
Do you have spacers?
I like this idea. Other than the price.
12-22-2005, 09:15 PM
#23
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 12,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The calipers are still as they were when GM assembled the car. No grinding at all, no spacers, etc.
Backspacing -- I don't remember for sure, but if memory serves they're 7.5 BS. I can go measure if you like.
Backspacing -- I don't remember for sure, but if memory serves they're 7.5 BS. I can go measure if you like.
12-23-2005, 04:09 PM
#24
Originally Posted by Brains
The calipers are still as they were when GM assembled the car. No grinding at all, no spacers, etc.
Backspacing -- I don't remember for sure, but if memory serves they're 7.5 BS. I can go measure if you like.
Backspacing -- I don't remember for sure, but if memory serves they're 7.5 BS. I can go measure if you like.
Do you think it would be noticeable if I ran XP's on the back and the regular 90 series on the front?
