stay with fast 90 /90 or
#21
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (28)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'm with a98ws6. I'm in the process of converting to a drag only car so I have some time before I make a decision on which intake to buy. I do plan on spraying so I like the idea of a less chance of leaning #7 & #8 and more even EGT's. It addition, it looks like it will be less expensive than a 90/90 setup.
#23
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cecil County Raceway!!!
Posts: 8,484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech20year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by 383ss
I think the general concensus right now is that it's not a very good intake for a stock cubic inch engine unless it is an all out drag car shifting at 8000.
something else, cam choice will be crucial. what is ideal for the FAST isn't necessarily ideal for a vic jr type intake since intake is no longer restricted...
#24
10 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kansas City, KS
Posts: 2,893
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Fireball
I think you're right about the all out drag car...but the shifting at 8K is something not yet shown.
something else, cam choice will be crucial. what is ideal for the FAST isn't necessarily ideal for a vic jr type intake since intake is no longer restricted...
something else, cam choice will be crucial. what is ideal for the FAST isn't necessarily ideal for a vic jr type intake since intake is no longer restricted...
cam size will probably be smaller in general for this intake for the same powerband as a FAST 90. the valves will have to be open for less time for the cylinder to fill the same amount because of less intake restriction.