retuned polluter results
11-17-2008, 01:28 PM
#21
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Look up demoncbird00. His cam only Fbody put down 450+ whp through stock heads with an untouched fast 90/90 with a 12 bolt rear end and his quarter mile times back up his numbers. He also drives the car daily.
Granted its a huge cam but its deff possible to put those sort of numbers down
Granted its a huge cam but its deff possible to put those sort of numbers down
11-17-2008, 03:48 PM
#22
I dont know about the rest of you all, but the "polluter" cam is a big cam that puts down Great mid range power. at least on the ones that have been posted here. And what I have been reading on them, they arent a top end cam. they produce shitloads of power from 4k to about 6200. The makers of the cam have said that it is made with different lobes and not the XER lobes that everybody is used to getting for the top end. Those numbers, IMO, do look legit. There was a Z06 that posted getting this cam only with boltons that pulled 450+ to the wheels. So, its possible.
11-17-2008, 08:01 PM
#24
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the guy that dynoed the car is as straight arrow as they come.432 was with the correction factor,it actually made 410 with the air that day it was 30 degrees and crappy out.regardless of what either dyno says the car runs considerably better with the new tune.a soon as it gets nice out again ill have some track times to back up the numbers,also ill get pics of the dyno sheets up a soon as i can.also this cam is a little different than the other big cams,its very streetable,makes very usable power from as low as 3000 up to 6500.the stock cam didnt even make much below 3000,dont knock it until you try it,tick perf. definitly got this cam right!!!
Last edited by cbr954rr; 11-17-2008 at 08:07 PM.
11-17-2008, 08:12 PM
#25
the guy that dynoed the car is as straight arrow as they come.432 was with the correction factor,it actually made 410 with the air that day it was 30 degrees and crappy out.regardless of what either dyno says the car runs considerably better with the new tune.a soon as it gets nice out again ill have some track times to back up the numbers,also ill get pics of the dyno sheets up a soon as i can.
I would maybe believe the other way around, car made 430 unc, then corrected down to 410 on the MD.
MD's are great for tuning a car to run its best, but not for posting pretty numbers like everyone likes to throw around on teh forumz. Furthermore, its lame when CF's are pulled out of thin air to try and make one dyno read like another...its a stinkin DYNO! Load cells, Play with timing, nail the AFR, then go to track or race your buddy or whatever.
11-18-2008, 08:43 AM
#30
Here is a Polluter/Trick Flow install graphed over our previous MS4 results. Of course it isn't an apples to apples comparison since we installed heads at the same time.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...fast92-m6.html
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...fast92-m6.html
