Avg. HP loss through Drivetrain?
http://www.converter.cc/tech_talk/
My rule of thumb has be 18% loss with the typical A4 and 15% of loss with the typical M6 in an F-body. That might be a little high.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I don't think there is a "set" percentage, just set amounts of power for certain parts.
Like.....
4L60E robs say....30rwhp with a stock converter
T-56 robs 15rwhp
stock 10 bolt robs 6 rwhp
9" robs 15rwhp
Etc......
Of course I just made up those numbers but you get the idea. I'd love to see someone do a test with a bunch of different combo's and compare. Car Craft done a test with rearends, I think it was a 9", a Dana 60 and a 12 bolt. They were all within a couple of horsepower from what I remember!
Automatic's lose a bunch and are a lot harder to nail down.
Gear ratio makes a difference, as does the tire pressure in the tires. We ran a 9' with micro polished gears and saw a difference.
People get way to wacked out with several things....
Cylinder Head Flow Numbers
Dyno Numbers
Cam Specs
Air Fuel Ratio
It is really about who wins the race
LOLRobin
Ok, so you are saying that the same exact drive train will rob MORE power from a motor making 1,000 hp compared to a motor making 500hp? That makes no sense what so ever.
And yes, it takes certain amounts of power to turn different objects such as, transmissions, rear ends, superchargers, etc.
Depending on what parts your drivetrain consists of you could come up with a percentage of loss but it will be completely based on what tranny, and rearend are in that vehicle.
Just to make this crystal clear.... Say you have a Camaro in the garage that has a 10 bolt rear end and a T-56 in it. The stock motor made 300 HP to the wheels. With what you are saying (15% rule), the drive train is robbing you of 45 HP. Now you put a built 408 into the same car with the SAME drivetrain and it makes 500 HP to the wheels. If you use the 15% rule again then that same drivetrain that robbed 45 HP from the stock motor is now robbing 75 HP from the 408.
It just doesn't make sense using one or two set percentages for every possible drive train combination.
Get it?
And Robin, I agree 100%. It seems like on the internet dyno numbers are more important than track times.
Even the engine performance is based on a volumentric efficiency which is a percentage. For instance a gen 1 sbc displaces 350 cu.in. Even with the most advance EFI system that could be run on them it still could never match the LS1 (at 346cu.in) for fuel mileage. It's a more efficient design. It's the same displacement moving the same air in a more efficient way. Efficiency is only ever measured as a percentage. The drivetrain has a negative PERCENTAGE loss of efficiency.
http://www.superstang.com/horsepower.htm#Proof1
I'm pretty open minded and I'm always looking to learn new things about engines/hot rods, etc.
I'll be the first one to admit that I'm no physicists, I'll check out the link that you posted and see if it makes more sense to me.








