Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

PRC Stage 1 243 heads, MS4 dyno

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-10-2009, 04:24 AM
  #21  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (30)
 
streetassasin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Orange, TX
Posts: 2,548
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

^x2 I'm instrested in one too
Old 02-10-2009, 07:35 AM
  #22  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Chrome355z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Shelbyville, IN
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wow, looks like my lid; bought it with the car and always wondered who mfg it because I haven't seen any like it!
Old 02-10-2009, 09:23 AM
  #23  
dug
Banned
iTrader: (10)
 
dug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Patrick G
This particular car had NO MAF, so from a flow standpoint, there was no MAF restriction.
I know all that. Have you seen any dynos of the gains from getting rid of the MAF restriction?
Old 02-10-2009, 10:01 AM
  #24  
LS1 Tech Administrator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,245
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 28 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by dug
I know all that. Have you seen any dynos of the gains from getting rid of the MAF restriction?
Yes. The gains depend on how healthy the motor is and what size the throttle body is. On my 508 rwhp 346, going from an 85mm MAF to no MAF was worth around 3 rwhp. I was running a Mamo ported FAST and a 90mm TB.

On a 400 rwhp LS1 that I ran with a ported stock TB, going to an 85mm MAF was worth no gain and going to a 3" pipe with no MAF was no gain. The throttle body was the choke in the system. So like I said, the gains vary.
__________________

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2022 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 S&B CAI, Corsa catback.
2023 Corvette 3LT Z51 soon to be modified.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.

Old 02-10-2009, 11:26 AM
  #25  
dug
Banned
iTrader: (10)
 
dug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

thanx for the info
Old 02-10-2009, 11:45 AM
  #26  
TECH Addict
 
bad95killer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Somewhere I Belong
Posts: 2,906
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Not bad at all and good to know that Pat

peace
Old 02-11-2009, 01:10 PM
  #27  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Kurtomac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Okinawa, Japan
Posts: 1,220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

........

Originally Posted by Kurtomac
Pat whats the deal with the tq curve and the loss in power at 4000ish....i got the same bs...some seem to be a nice smooth tq curve some have this horrible dip in them....is it the cam not designed well for the cubes or what?
heres mine for reference of what im talking about in the tq curve....didnt matter if we made it fat, lean, add timing, take out timing couldnt get rid of these hills
mines a stock short 346 with TFS 61cc 215's a 236 238 601 605 113+2 comp xe xer grind with a fast 92 and all the boltons on my Z06
Old 02-11-2009, 03:25 PM
  #28  
LS1 Tech Administrator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,245
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 28 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Kurtomac
Pat whats the deal with the tq curve and the loss in power at 4000ish....i got the same bs...some seem to be a nice smooth tq curve some have this horrible dip in them....is it the cam not designed well for the cubes or what?
heres mine for reference of what im talking about in the tq curve....didnt matter if we made it fat, lean, add timing, take out timing couldnt get rid of these hills
mines a stock short 346 with TFS 61cc 215's a 236 238 601 605 113+2 comp xe xer grind with a fast 92 and all the boltons on my Z06
I think the double hump in the graph stems from having the intake valve events much later than the intake manifold is tuned for. Basically the IVO and IVC are not in harmony with the tuned runner length of the intake. The intake will try to force a torque peak at 4800 rpm and the cam timing is trying to force a peak at a much later rpm.
__________________

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2022 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 S&B CAI, Corsa catback.
2023 Corvette 3LT Z51 soon to be modified.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.

Old 02-11-2009, 04:27 PM
  #29  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Kurtomac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Okinawa, Japan
Posts: 1,220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

damn...stupid hype cams...shoulda done my research prior to installing...to cam a vette is not nearly as simple as a F body
Going to have you spec me a cam for next winter....Ill swap cams for something that will have a smoother Tq curve and match my heads and setup better
you spec'd my buddy PRAY a cam on his 416 Z06 and his TQ curve looks perfect and makes gobs of power (573rwhp)
I think you said in a previous PM i would benefit for a cam with more split to match my heads and some of the newer cam lobes currently have old school XE and XER lobes
1990s called and they want their XE lobes back
Dont understand why they'd develop a cam for the LS1 (IE my current and many others) that everything wouldnt be in sync and have smooth HP and TQ power curves
Do you think I would benefit from MORE duration or just more split? No problem spinning to 7K rpm and im fine with the driveability of my 236 238 cam
Doing 390 gears with my MN12 trans the end of the month too
might have to make this cam swap a spring/summer project
Currently swapping my stock clutch out for a twin disk, might remove my maf completely (tuned it myself SD), swapping to a set of ARH 1 7/8 headers from my current 1 3/4 LG pros....this with a cam change...you think my goals below would be attainable?
Whatcha think PATG Looking for 480-490RWHP
THANKS
KURTOMAC
BTW thanks for your response
Old 02-15-2009, 10:50 AM
  #30  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
 
chrs1313's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,697
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 98Aggie
The UPD lid is raised in the front to allow for more air and smoother air flow through the front of the filter, the back of the lid is made to channel and keep a smooth flow of air into the intake, removing the square edges reducing turbulence which will act like a restriction (seen on the MTI/SLP and Fast Toys). The Fast Toys lid tried to get around the UPD Patent by adding the power bulge to allow for more air but it did not address the turbulent flow from the back corners. Lastly the UPD clears all hoods no rubbing issues.

damn that is a sexy lid and that has got to be one of the best stock size flowing lids...i would bet anything that if it had a 85mm snout it would outflow a FTRA 85mm...

that is actually a perfectly designed lid...exactly what i wanted to do with some fiberglass because i didnt know one was on the market...
Old 02-15-2009, 11:33 AM
  #31  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Abdullah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 1,455
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Patrick G

Looking at his airlid assembly, the customer's SS had the optional SLP 345hp package which included the Blackwing air lid. The opening of the air lid was only about 1/2" across. Talk about a restriction. We unbolted the radiator support to raise the air lid (to give it a 1" opening).
Patrick, would you illustrate what do you mean by the opening of the air lid was 1/2" across? do you mean from the air lid to the MAF? where that opening exactly? i realy didn't understand what did you mean by that?

thanks.
Old 02-15-2009, 12:11 PM
  #32  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
SS DNA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NorcaL
Posts: 2,187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Where can we buy that UPD lid ?

Is it still available ?
Old 02-15-2009, 12:53 PM
  #33  
Moderator
iTrader: (19)
 
98Aggie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Mission Valley, TX
Posts: 2,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by chrs1313
damn that is a sexy lid and that has got to be one of the best stock size flowing lids...i would bet anything that if it had a 85mm snout it would outflow a FTRA 85mm...

that is actually a perfectly designed lid...exactly what i wanted to do with some fiberglass because i didnt know one was on the market...

It does have the 85mm snout - ID is 92mm

I still have a couple available.
Old 02-15-2009, 06:21 PM
  #34  
Launching!
iTrader: (5)
 
blubox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Abdullah
Patrick, would you illustrate what do you mean by the opening of the air lid was 1/2" across? do you mean from the air lid to the MAF? where that opening exactly? i realy didn't understand what did you mean by that?

thanks.
Look down at your airlid..see where the lid clips to the bottom part of your intake, same piece that bolts over the radiator?

Your gonna wanna put some washers in between the the bottom part of the intake and where it bolts up.

So unbolt the bottom part of the intake and stick some washers under it where the bolts go. Make sure you put the bolts back through the washers and bolt it back down.

I hope that makes sense, wasn't as easy to explain as I thought it was...
Old 02-15-2009, 06:27 PM
  #35  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
bigpapi211's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: ny
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

there current ls6 head is a 799 casting not a 243 casting is this an older set?
Old 02-15-2009, 07:18 PM
  #36  
cjh
Staging Lane
iTrader: (4)
 
cjh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bigpapi211
there current ls6 head is a 799 casting not a 243 casting is this an older set?
yes, its an older set. got these before the 799 were out.
Old 02-16-2009, 07:12 AM
  #37  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Abdullah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 1,455
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by blubox
Look down at your airlid..see where the lid clips to the bottom part of your intake, same piece that bolts over the radiator?

Your gonna wanna put some washers in between the the bottom part of the intake and where it bolts up.

So unbolt the bottom part of the intake and stick some washers under it where the bolts go. Make sure you put the bolts back through the washers and bolt it back down.

I hope that makes sense, wasn't as easy to explain as I thought it was...
i got it, thanks.

does that straighten the air entering the engine more than if the lower part of the intake setting lower?

will i have any hood clearance issue with raising the lower part of the intake?

btw, what i understood now from Patrick post is that i need to raise the lower part of the intake 1/2", is that correct? or how high do i need to raise it?

thanks.
Old 02-16-2009, 08:53 AM
  #38  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
69_YENKO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Angelo, TX
Posts: 1,645
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Abdullah
i got it, thanks.

does that straighten the air entering the engine more than if the lower part of the intake setting lower?

will i have any hood clearance issue with raising the lower part of the intake?

btw, what i understood now from Patrick post is that i need to raise the lower part of the intake 1/2", is that correct? or how high do i need to raise it?

thanks.
the reason to raise it is because that point is a restriction in the intake track.

I never really thought about it before, but if you look at it, that small 1/2 gap doesnt really allow for too much air to enter. Raising up the base allows for a lager opening and more air to freely enter.

you'll need to keep hood clearance in mind when raising up the base, checking your hood to lid spacing adding washers as needed without adding too many and causing the hood to strike the lid when it closes.
Old 02-17-2009, 02:39 PM
  #39  
TECH Fanatic
 
turbo'd stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Good detective work!

Who did the SD tune originally?
Old 02-17-2009, 06:50 PM
  #40  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (7)
 
shiv15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Flint, MI
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I saw it was asked a few times in the thread... but how does the UPD stack up to the Fast toys 85mm then? Both look like great products but which will have higher output?


Quick Reply: PRC Stage 1 243 heads, MS4 dyno



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:53 AM.