Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

235/243 LSR cam results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-26-2009, 03:16 PM
  #41  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Ksths2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Iowa
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hey Detroitmuscle, did you have to flycut your pistons when running that much lift and 110 lsa? What is your ptv clearance?
i am getting a 235/240 .621/.609 111+1 cam and i'm worried that i'll have to flycut on my ls1.
Thanks!
Old 04-26-2009, 07:50 PM
  #42  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
Detroitmuscle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Shelby Twp.
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I did not have to fly cut my pistons, I am running ETP 5.3 heads and GM MLS gaskets and I had at least .100" of clearance.
Old 05-04-2009, 10:50 PM
  #43  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (22)
 
jegten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NM/FL
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

where can we get more info on these LSL lobe cams?
i have been searching, and must not be looking in the right places.
thanks!!
Old 05-04-2009, 11:24 PM
  #44  
c6r
On The Tree
 
c6r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Currently running a ls2 with honker coldair box, ported t/b with a fast 92mm intake and kooks 1 7/8 lngtubes w/cats B&B exh. making 410rwhp & 403ftq , will be adding patriot 243's harlandsharp rocker arms 1.7 and a comps 238/242 610,604 on a 115 lsa, CAN'T WAIT TO SEE THE RESULTS.
Old 05-05-2009, 02:34 PM
  #45  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
Chris Gage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sarasota & Lee County
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jegten
where can we get more info on these LSL lobe cams?
i have been searching, and must not be looking in the right places.
thanks!!
Check out comps website. LSL/LSK/LSR lobes are similiar, I liked the way the LSR lobes looked personally but I am not sure how fond I am of Comps shelf specs. I believe some vendors are beggining to play around with the LSR lobes more and more and should make great power with good flowing heads.
Old 05-12-2009, 06:42 PM
  #46  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (22)
 
jegten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NM/FL
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Chris Gage
Check out comps website. LSL/LSK/LSR lobes are similiar, I liked the way the LSR lobes looked personally but I am not sure how fond I am of Comps shelf specs. I believe some vendors are beggining to play around with the LSR lobes more and more and should make great power with good flowing heads.
Chris, thanks for the response!
i tried comps site, but didn't really give me details on these lobes. i'll try again.
i was considering a 243/251 or a 239/247 for an ls3 418 stroker.
Old 05-12-2009, 09:40 PM
  #47  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
Chris Gage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sarasota & Lee County
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jegten
Chris, thanks for the response!
i tried comps site, but didn't really give me details on these lobes. i'll try again.
i was considering a 243/251 or a 239/247 for an ls3 418 stroker.
Here is a list of their N/A cams. Seems like Comp really liked the 16 degree split on a cam that would be directed more towards your app. I would try to stay closer to the 114lsa, as the stroked motors dont always need a tighter seperation. I am sure Pat.G, Predator, or Ed curtis can point you more towards the right direction here.

LSr cathedral port cams (small displacement or max torque 4.8-5.3)

54-455-11 215/223 .604/.610 112LSA

54-456-11 219/227 .607/.614 112LSA

54-457-11 223/231 .610/.617 112LSA

54-458-11 227/235 .614/.621 113LSA


LSr Cathedral Port (All out power 5.7-6.2)

54-459-11 231/239 .617/.624 113LSA

54-460-11 235/243 .621/.624 113LSA

54-461-11 239/247 .624/.624 114LSA

54-462-11 243/251 .624/.624 114LSA


LSr Cathedral Port (large displacement only 6.2-7.4)

54-463-11 247/255 .624/.624 114LSA

54-463-11 251/259 .624/.624 115LSA

54-464-11 255/263 .624/.624 115LSA

54-465-11 259/267 .624/.624 115LSA


LSr Rectangular Port (all out power 5.7-6.2)

54-469-11 231/247 .617/.624 113LSA

54-470-11 235/251 .621/.624 113LSA

54-471-11 239/255 .624/.624 114LSA

54-472-11 243/259 .624/.624 114LSA


LSr Rectangular port (large displacement 6.2-7.4)

54-473-11 247/263 .624/.624 114LSA

54-474-11 251/267 .624/.624 115LSA

54-475-11 255/271 .624/.624 115LSA

54-476-11 259/275 .624/.624 115LSA
Old 05-12-2009, 10:12 PM
  #48  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (22)
 
jegten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NM/FL
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

hey, Chris,

wow! thanks!
i already spoke to Ed Curtis. i like his cams very much, and have had two of them .. the reason for considering any of these ones is as a result of trying to be a little "open minded", just doing research to make a more educated decision. i have seen results on my first choice. now, i am seeing results, and very nice btw, with these lobes.

sent you a pm.
Old 05-12-2009, 10:32 PM
  #49  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (22)
 
jegten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NM/FL
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Chris Gage
...Seems like Comp really liked the 16 degree split on a cam that would be directed more towards your app. I would try to stay closer to the 114lsa, as the stroked motors dont always need a tighter seperation.
sorry, i forgot to mention, i am using cathedral port heads.
i was thinking 113+3lsa, or so. your thoughts?
bold faced-that is interesting.
Old 05-12-2009, 10:45 PM
  #50  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
Chris Gage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sarasota & Lee County
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I dont want to jump off topic here so I shot you a PM.

Sorry OP
Old 05-12-2009, 11:44 PM
  #51  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (22)
 
jegten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NM/FL
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

yes, OP, sorry. i got carried away.
but, it was all prompted by your great results. thanks!
Old 05-13-2009, 10:14 PM
  #52  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Ksths2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Iowa
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

New news about my cam i just got, I pulled the trigger on Speed Inc's SI6 cam 235/240 .621/.609 111 lsa and to my surprise i got it and the comp cam card says 235/240 .643/.609 111+1 lsa........ wow that's crazy for a C5 6 speed TEA 5.3L heads isn't it? According to Larry i should be still ok on ptv clearance i guess we'll see. Oh btw, my point of the story is this cam has LSK lobes and the .621/.609 lift has LSR lobes.
Old 05-29-2010, 09:55 AM
  #53  
On The Tree
 
redsap05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: akron ohio
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I am going to bring this thread back from the dead because I am thinking about putting this in my ls2. First of all 349 with headers is low. A ls2 with long tubes should be about 375rwhp in a m6. So if this gains 79rwhp you should see about 450rwhp and nearly 470rwhp with fast, lt's, cai. I know Iam bench racing here but just estimating and pointing out that ls2's with lt's make more than 349. Has anyone else tried this cam, if so post your results, thanks.
Old 05-31-2010, 07:49 PM
  #54  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Paint_It_Black's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Chi-town West Burbs
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Ksths2
New news about my cam i just got, I pulled the trigger on Speed Inc's SI6 cam 235/240 .621/.609 111 lsa and to my surprise i got it and the comp cam card says 235/240 .643/.609 111+1 lsa........ wow that's crazy for a C5 6 speed TEA 5.3L heads isn't it? According to Larry i should be still ok on ptv clearance i guess we'll see. Oh btw, my point of the story is this cam has LSK lobes and the .621/.609 lift has LSR lobes.
You'll still be fine on ptv but that's not what you ordered. I'd send it back to speed inc and ask for what you paid for. The LSK lobe is violent. It is VERY hard on the springs and I know a few top LS engine builders won't run them ever for anything. They're also very hard to control at high rpms, especially without lightweight parts like titanium valves.

Someone fucked up and ordered or ground the wrong lobe, you should get what you ordered.
Old 07-13-2010, 08:16 PM
  #55  
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
GoatCaptain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: The Woodlands, TX
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by redsap05
I am going to bring this thread back from the dead because I am thinking about putting this in my ls2. First of all 349 with headers is low. A ls2 with long tubes should be about 375rwhp in a m6. So if this gains 79rwhp you should see about 450rwhp and nearly 470rwhp with fast, lt's, cai. I know Iam bench racing here but just estimating and pointing out that ls2's with lt's make more than 349. Has anyone else tried this cam, if so post your results, thanks.
this is true, i was running longtubes and a CAI before and i was at 370rwhp

I'm using the original posters cam in my 402 stroker build and should have the results this week. fwiw
Old 07-13-2010, 08:40 PM
  #56  
On The Tree
 
mercccc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: shrewsbury, ma
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

just got mine tuned yesterday...its a 2000 trans am m6 with a stock l92 bottom end, prc stage 2.5 5.3 heads roughly 11.46:1 compression 235/243 .621/.624 111 cam, pacesetter headers, no cats, magnaflow cat back, unported fast 92 w. nw 92 tbody, moser 12 bolt with 4.10 gears, tsp 100mm maf, and it put down 473 whp and 436 foot pounds on a mustang dyno...working on getting the graph up
Old 07-14-2010, 07:06 PM
  #57  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
Sube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Kansas City, Missouri
Posts: 286
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mercccc
just got mine tuned yesterday...its a 2000 trans am m6 with a stock l92 bottom end, prc stage 2.5 5.3 heads roughly 11.46:1 compression 235/243 .621/.624 111 cam, pacesetter headers, no cats, magnaflow cat back, unported fast 92 w. nw 92 tbody, moser 12 bolt with 4.10 gears, tsp 100mm maf, and it put down 473 whp and 436 foot pounds on a mustang dyno...working on getting the graph up
Holy crap that's awesome! Especially on a mustang dyno. I got the same cam going in a very similar motor. I got a 1999 TA M6 forged 347, PRC Stage 1 LS6 head milled to 60cc, Pacesetter headers, no cats, flowmaster merge with cutout, hooker catback, hand ported 90/90, and Moser 9inch 3.89 gears. I hope I get the same results with a slightly smaller motor. Would love to see the graph whenever you can get it posted up.
Old 07-14-2010, 09:18 PM
  #58  
On The Tree
 
mercccc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: shrewsbury, ma
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

this is the graph before the 100mm maf, 104mm lid, and the slowhawk tune..should have the new one up soon tho
Attached Thumbnails 235/243 LSR cam results-dyno-sean.jpg  
Old 07-15-2010, 12:34 AM
  #59  
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
GoatCaptain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: The Woodlands, TX
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have this cam and it put down 468rwhp and 439rwtq with the mods in my sig. Thats using the stock ls2 intake and throttle body also.fwiw

This Cam is impressive imho
Old 07-15-2010, 07:06 AM
  #60  
On The Tree
 
mercccc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: shrewsbury, ma
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

i like the cam alot also, our power looks to be very close. thats pretty impresive with stock ls2 intake and tbody..i did trap close to 123 untuned without the maf and new lid last week in a 3700 pound car in 94 degree and very humid weather


Quick Reply: 235/243 LSR cam results



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:40 AM.