2001 Camaro z28, Headers, Exhaust, Intake,stock internals, Tuned.... 366/397
03-30-2010, 08:46 PM
#21
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Every car I've ever seen thats been on a dynocom has had seriously inflated torque numbers but what's surprising is that the HP is almost always in line with "what it should be"... Nice numbers I guess, op?
03-30-2010, 09:33 PM
#23
My installation of the 90/90 on the stock heads didn't give me much more than the LS6 intake. Does all the air flow before the restriction of the stock cylinder heads matter as much? Kind of like friction loss with a fire hose... Either way, I'm kind of lost for words about the OP's results. Would love to see it on another dyno to justify its results. I'm sure tuning your own vehicle is very rewarding in the end.
03-31-2010, 05:21 AM
#24
What AFR and timing are you running? Those numbers are pretty hard to believe, putting down more torque than most cammed cars. You can break the tires lose in 3rd gear at 65 mph, do you have 3.42 gears? Thats 3800 rpm if you have 3.42 gears with an M6, unless you are driving on ice thats very hard to believe, either that or you have some very crappy tires. What casting number are you heads, you might have a LS6 motor.
03-31-2010, 08:29 AM
#26
Not trying to be a jerk or hater, but that's the only response that comes to mind when I hear someone say something that outrageous. Not even the majority of the H/C cars out there put out that much peak rwtq SAE on a dynojet, and you think you did it with some "good tuning" and bolt-ons?
Regardless, let us know how it goes at the track. I'd love to see some times and be proven wrong because we all like to believe that more is possible with these cars than what we've seen done previously. It's just that something this unbelievable is...well...unbelievable. Good luck at the track, man.
03-31-2010, 10:49 PM
#28
lay off the lad guyz ..... give him a chance to prove he z right !! I WANT TO BELIVE UR RIGHT SERIOUSLY !!
coz Fast & kook's will be the new heads & cam in the market =p
coz Fast & kook's will be the new heads & cam in the market =p
Last edited by Reaperchild; 03-31-2010 at 10:50 PM. Reason: spelling
04-01-2010, 12:23 AM
#31
Sorry man, but regardless of previous experience, anyone who thinks their "well-tuned" bolt-on-only LS1 is putting down an honest 420rwtq SAE on a dynojet is out of their god damn mind.
Not trying to be a jerk or hater, but that's the only response that comes to mind when I hear someone say something that outrageous. Not even the majority of the H/C cars out there put out that much peak rwtq SAE on a dynojet, and you think you did it with some "good tuning" and bolt-ons
Not trying to be a jerk or hater, but that's the only response that comes to mind when I hear someone say something that outrageous. Not even the majority of the H/C cars out there put out that much peak rwtq SAE on a dynojet, and you think you did it with some "good tuning" and bolt-ons
While your in Bowling Green to hit up the track, why don't you stop by the Horsepower House and see if you get 420 rwtq sae on their dyno jet...
Hey Duude !! 
04-05-2010, 09:54 PM
#37
Dynocom #'s seem a bit inflated, not sure though. There was an sponsor that made 600 rwhp on an LS3 427 which caught my attention, hoping these numbers are legit.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...-427-na-3.html
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...-427-na-3.html
04-05-2010, 10:27 PM
#38
torque #'s are correct... verified with simple math based on the data from a log on the dyno....
I have an excel spreadsheet I built for tuning...over a dozen cars tuned and the HP/TQ #'s come out right in line with the dyno on every car I've tuned...I have presets for Dynojet/Dynocom/mustang/and the street
I take data from HP Tuners..export the log to a .csv file...use my sheet to auto import data and sort it...
enter in weather data, some vehicle specific things(weight/tires/tranny info)
and it spits out HP/TQ #'s in a graph based on that data... and it also calculates an optimum shift point for your setup as well.
right now my optimum shift point for this stock cam and my mods is at 5700 rpm.
thats where if I stay in the current gear I will be putting down less torque and power to the wheels than if I shifted into the next gear.(calculating for gear ratio's)
its a complex worksheet that has been in the making for over a year and a half...with lots of dyno time to get the data and math right.
I'm in the process of searching for the right person to turn it into software so that I can sell to the general public.
04-05-2010, 10:58 PM
#40
TECH Fanatic
What AFR and timing are you running? Those numbers are pretty hard to believe, putting down more torque than most cammed cars. You can break the tires lose in 3rd gear at 65 mph, do you have 3.42 gears? Thats 3800 rpm if you have 3.42 gears with an M6, unless you are driving on ice thats very hard to believe, either that or you have some very crappy tires. What casting number are you heads, you might have a LS6 motor.
That could explain breaking the tires loose at 65 mph.
