368hp/355tq Sound pretty close?
#21
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Fuquay Varina, NC
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I know it's an auto and everything, but that seems pretty low for a cam of that size. I have a M6, but with just bolt ons I'm making 360 rwhp and 375 ft lbs. With that cam, which is what I'm planning on getting, I'd hope to make at least 400 rwhp. Not really sure what my torque would be at.
#22
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Clarksburg, WV
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I know it's an auto and everything, but that seems pretty low for a cam of that size. I have a M6, but with just bolt ons I'm making 360 rwhp and 375 ft lbs. With that cam, which is what I'm planning on getting, I'd hope to make at least 400 rwhp. Not really sure what my torque would be at.
I'm not trying busting your ***** or anything, just asking to help broaden my knowledge about roughly what kind of power I should be expecting.
#23
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Lol. I feel the same way in general. I just use the dyno for what it is, a comparison tool. I usually used the same guy's dyno every time to measure mine when I did something just to compare it to itself. He's all but gotten out of it because his job in the mines has gotten so busy though. I'll probably be using Rodeheavers from now on. This being the Dynamometer Results & Comparisons section though is why I'm talking about the dyno numbers. As far as track times, I haven't had time to get back yet, but it's hopefully coming soon enough.
#25
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
my car with the mods in my sig made 345rwhp (cutouts closed, converter unlocked) on a dynojet
runs 7.8s @89 in the heat and humidity with a spinning 1.79 60 ft in a car that weighs at least 3700 race weight with me in it...seems pretty on par to me, see what it does in non-3000ft DA
I bet levilz runs mid-low 7s @91-92 mph with tires and stall if he's around full weight at 2k DA or under
runs 7.8s @89 in the heat and humidity with a spinning 1.79 60 ft in a car that weighs at least 3700 race weight with me in it...seems pretty on par to me, see what it does in non-3000ft DA
I bet levilz runs mid-low 7s @91-92 mph with tires and stall if he's around full weight at 2k DA or under
#26
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Clarksburg, WV
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I was thinking 7.6-7.7 range in a good DA in the 1/8. I can't seem to ever catch a DA under 3000 at PRP which is our closest track. I'll be going to Cecil County Dragway the end of October when I go to visit some family out that way. That should give me damn good conditions if I could get around to getting the stall in by then... That probably won't happen though.
#28
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
partial tune
auto
mustang dyno
no pulley or mention of ported tb
98 heads
and still made 370rwhp...doesn't sound low to me at all...on a dynojet he might be close to 400rwhp without even being full boltons and with the supposedly shitty 98 casting heads and not even a full accurate tune, for an automatic that is pretty damn good
auto
mustang dyno
no pulley or mention of ported tb
98 heads
and still made 370rwhp...doesn't sound low to me at all...on a dynojet he might be close to 400rwhp without even being full boltons and with the supposedly shitty 98 casting heads and not even a full accurate tune, for an automatic that is pretty damn good
![Nod](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_nod.gif)