Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

368hp/355tq Sound pretty close?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-18-2010, 08:18 AM
  #21  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
ncfastls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Fuquay Varina, NC
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I know it's an auto and everything, but that seems pretty low for a cam of that size. I have a M6, but with just bolt ons I'm making 360 rwhp and 375 ft lbs. With that cam, which is what I'm planning on getting, I'd hope to make at least 400 rwhp. Not really sure what my torque would be at.
Old 08-18-2010, 09:38 AM
  #22  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
levilz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Clarksburg, WV
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ncfastls1
I know it's an auto and everything, but that seems pretty low for a cam of that size. I have a M6, but with just bolt ons I'm making 360 rwhp and 375 ft lbs. With that cam, which is what I'm planning on getting, I'd hope to make at least 400 rwhp. Not really sure what my torque would be at.
Which dyno was your 360 made on? My buddy did 358 on the Dynojet with his bolt on M6, but then with the same setup did 320 on the Mustang. If you go by Dynojet numbers, which I hope to get on sometime, just for comparison, I'd be roughly at 412. I'm thinking that's close to where it should be. That number is not proven and I'm just estimating based the general rule that the MD reads about 12% lower than a DJ.

I'm not trying busting your ***** or anything, just asking to help broaden my knowledge about roughly what kind of power I should be expecting.
Old 08-18-2010, 10:11 AM
  #23  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
draggin97s10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by levilz
Lol. I feel the same way in general. I just use the dyno for what it is, a comparison tool. I usually used the same guy's dyno every time to measure mine when I did something just to compare it to itself. He's all but gotten out of it because his job in the mines has gotten so busy though. I'll probably be using Rodeheavers from now on. This being the Dynamometer Results & Comparisons section though is why I'm talking about the dyno numbers. As far as track times, I haven't had time to get back yet, but it's hopefully coming soon enough.
thats what a dyno is good for tuning and comparison.
Old 08-18-2010, 10:56 AM
  #24  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
levilz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Clarksburg, WV
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Old 08-18-2010, 11:27 AM
  #25  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
thunderstruck507's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northwest AR
Posts: 8,357
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

my car with the mods in my sig made 345rwhp (cutouts closed, converter unlocked) on a dynojet

runs 7.8s @89 in the heat and humidity with a spinning 1.79 60 ft in a car that weighs at least 3700 race weight with me in it...seems pretty on par to me, see what it does in non-3000ft DA

I bet levilz runs mid-low 7s @91-92 mph with tires and stall if he's around full weight at 2k DA or under
Old 08-18-2010, 11:47 AM
  #26  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
levilz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Clarksburg, WV
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I was thinking 7.6-7.7 range in a good DA in the 1/8. I can't seem to ever catch a DA under 3000 at PRP which is our closest track. I'll be going to Cecil County Dragway the end of October when I go to visit some family out that way. That should give me damn good conditions if I could get around to getting the stall in by then... That probably won't happen though.
Old 08-18-2010, 11:51 AM
  #27  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
ds98formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Joliet Illinois
Posts: 965
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Very reachable goal
Old 08-18-2010, 01:19 PM
  #28  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
WSsick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: St. Peters, MO
Posts: 2,418
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by thunderstruck507
partial tune
auto
mustang dyno
no pulley or mention of ported tb
98 heads

and still made 370rwhp...doesn't sound low to me at all...on a dynojet he might be close to 400rwhp without even being full boltons and with the supposedly shitty 98 casting heads and not even a full accurate tune, for an automatic that is pretty damn good
I agree with everything here.
Old 08-18-2010, 01:49 PM
  #29  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
levilz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Clarksburg, WV
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Thanks guys!




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:21 AM.