2000 Trans Am Dyno
IS THIS PRETTY GOOD??
IT IS A 5.7L--WORN OUT ENGINE,THE GUY WANTED TO RUN IT UNTIL IT BLEW UP.
IT HAS A VORTECH ON IT-- MAKING 8-9PSI [HAS AFTERCOOLER]
STAGE II JD'S CYLINDER HEADS
JD'S CUSTOM 220 CAM FOR SUPERCHARGER
STOCK INTAKE W/EGR
STOCK EXHAUST MANIFOLDS
STOCK CATYLITIC CONVERTORS
38LB INJECTORS--WHICH NEED TO BE CHANGED IN ORDER TO FINISH TUNING.
WITH NEW INJECTORS AND FINAL TUNE SHOULD BE 550+RWHP
JUST TRYING TO GET SOME INFO--I WILL POST THE FINAL DYNO SHEETS WITH A/F NEXT WEK WHEN COMPLETELY FINISHED.
THANKS
JOE D.

I AM TRYING TO POST THE DYNO SHEETS WHICH ARE IN .DOC FILES AND IT SAYS THEY ARE TOO LARGE--ANYONE KNOW HOW TO DO THAT??
Last edited by RESTOMAN; Jan 31, 2004 at 03:08 PM.
JOE D.
Trending Topics
I 'VE MADE THE NECESSARY CHECKS FOR THAT.
THANKS FOR YOUR INPUT THOUGH.
650 HORSE POWER AT THE ENGINE WITH A 20% LOSS WOULD BE APPROX.520-530 RWHP WHICH I AM AT.
BSFC OF 0.6 -- DUTY CYCLE OF 90% --- FUEL PRESSURE AT 60 PSI WOT
WOULD BE AN INJECTOR SIZE OF 46+ FOR AN 8 CYL SUPERCHARGED ENGINE.
JOE D.
Last edited by RESTOMAN; Jan 31, 2004 at 02:44 PM. Reason: FUEL PRESSURE
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Thank you
JUST MAKING SURE--DIDN'T WANT YOU TO MISS ANYTHING--
ANYTHING ELSE YOU HAVE TO SAY THAT WOULD BE WORTH WHILE???
thanks
Joe D.
Thank you

anything else you have to add to the tech thread??
just wondering levvi--
you guys are quick draw mcgraw on the ball busting--aren't we.
joe d.
i guess it really depends on what you get used to.a dyno is only a tool--some people just get used to different tools.
i have tuned many s/c cars,fi cars,and carbureted cars.
thanks for your input--i appreciate it.
at least you are trying to say something pertaining to the thread and technical.
thanks again
joe d.
just wondering levvi--
you guys are quick draw mcgraw on the ball busting--aren't we.
joe d.
I'm awaiting the results too as this is what this thread was made to show. I didn't realize you were asking for our advice on how to tune the car for more power hence I didn't feel it was a "tech" inquiring post. That's why I posted no "tech" advice. I was just asking for no "CAPS LOCK" in the interim.
When I read it I get the impression of the highschool bully yelling at everyone trying to get attention. Your results of the power so far are great and would still be well received without the CAPS LOCK. I know you're excited, as are we, so all I ask is a cutback of the CAPS LOCK. Your results speak for themselves and don't really need an entire post of CAPS LOCK.

Might as well give the customer what he asked for

Might as well give the customer what he asked for

supercharged cars do require more fuel than n/a cars-you can see that.
take it easy
joe d.



