Full Bolt on LS1 Dyno results 363hp 380wtq (**UPDATE**360hp correct)
01-12-2012, 08:42 AM
#21
I was fairly suprised at the numbers. I'm very happy considering all the research, time, and money I spent this year. I was expecting numbers in the 330's-345'ish thinking realistically, but 350 range is a sigh of relief and now im a firm believer in all the little things add up
02-13-2012, 09:00 AM
#23
Justed wanted to bump this with a update, I went to our local dynoday, and I dynoed 356hp and check this, 405-410 ft/lb torque. The torque really suprised me, its hard to see why I have so much torque.
The only thing I did different, was change out my old holley powershot filter and dropped in a brand new k&n and i have a 5 hp & 30~ ft/lb torque gain. Another thing to note was the temp outside was about 45-55~ degrees.
I'll upload the chart during lunch.
The only thing I did different, was change out my old holley powershot filter and dropped in a brand new k&n and i have a 5 hp & 30~ ft/lb torque gain. Another thing to note was the temp outside was about 45-55~ degrees.
I'll upload the chart during lunch.
02-13-2012, 09:24 AM
#24
sorry to say again man but thats def a dyno error and since HP=(Tq*RPM)/5252 I'd be willing to bet the hp numbers may be off also. 405ft lbs is way to much for an ls1, cam cars are usually right around 380-400 and a bolt on car is around 340-350. Take it to the track and see what it traps if its making 400 ft lbs of tq you have a 115mph car there all day long
02-13-2012, 10:02 AM
#25
sorry to say again man but thats def a dyno error and since HP=(Tq*RPM)/5252 I'd be willing to bet the hp numbers may be off also. 405ft lbs is way to much for an ls1, cam cars are usually right around 380-400 and a bolt on car is around 340-350. Take it to the track and see what it traps if its making 400 ft lbs of tq you have a 115mph car there all day long
this is my second time running 350 hp on a dyno, with updated software/firmware, so i think my hp numbers should be correct.
02-13-2012, 03:41 PM
#27
12 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: st. louis mo
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hey man, two different dyno's and numbers that are close with the only difference being filter change which very could add up.... I say your on it and what ever it is keep it up, if you get stout tq numbers like that from bolt on imagine where you would land with a good head setup or even a wet N2O kit, tq would be through the roof haha 
everyone is going to have their "well that cant be right comments" but every once in a while you come across one of those freak motors. Congrats 
everyone is going to have their "well that cant be right comments" but every once in a while you come across one of those freak motors. Congrats 
02-13-2012, 07:12 PM
#29
12 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Guthrie,Oklahoma
Posts: 654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hey man, two different dyno's and numbers that are close with the only difference being filter change which very could add up.... I say your on it and what ever it is keep it up, if you get stout tq numbers like that from bolt on imagine where you would land with a good head setup or even a wet N2O kit, tq would be through the roof haha everyone is going to have their "well that cant be right comments" but every once in a while you come across one of those freak motors. Congrats
everyone is going to have their "well that cant be right comments" but every once in a while you come across one of those freak motors. Congrats I have seen this a couple times. My buddies old 02 gt had a freak motor in it. It was crazy quick for a cai and mufflers. Then my buddies s2k could be... He says it stock and I have seen his engine and its quick also. Just some back up lol. Very good numbers man
02-14-2012, 08:56 AM
#31
thx guys, I totally forgot to upload the dyno sheet yesterday, i"ll make sure to do so at lunch.
I got alot of the mods nobody wants to throw on because it has minimal/no gains, but i do believe it all stacked up just fine.
I had a friend of mine, on the same dyno, typical bolt ons, m6, dyno 380 hp, is that about right for a m6?
I got alot of the mods nobody wants to throw on because it has minimal/no gains, but i do believe it all stacked up just fine.
I had a friend of mine, on the same dyno, typical bolt ons, m6, dyno 380 hp, is that about right for a m6?
02-14-2012, 02:58 PM
#39
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Laurel, MD
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I dynoed on a Dynomite as well, and my full bolt on plus cam numbers were WAY low compared to what others were seeing. I'd be wary of anything other than a Dynojet or Mustang dyno.