dyno results 402
#22
TECH Resident
iTrader: (24)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Those are some very strong #'s with an S60 and they seem high, but it may be just a great combination. My numbers, which are off by 30-40 rwhp, were on the 10-bolt (drop another 10-15 rwhp with my S60) .... damn that seems high or maybe I am just jealous! What does the car ET??
#23
TECH Resident
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Cartersville, Georgia
Posts: 866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
As far as the numbers from this thread, maybe the air in Canada is way different ... much more dense ... more oxygen content .... yea that's it, different air up there makes for 10% increases in power ... lol.
#25
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NB Canada
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
like i said before i find the numbers on the high side also, without changing anything on the dyno, what could be the reason for my high numbers, the vette in front of me ls3 2008 made 363. the 69 charger 440 6 pack with lots of work made 480rwhp running lean, and had dynoed the engine alone at 577hp, that seems fair for those cars
#26
TECH Resident
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Cartersville, Georgia
Posts: 866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
like i said before i find the numbers on the high side also, without changing anything on the dyno, what could be the reason for my high numbers, the vette in front of me ls3 2008 made 363. the 69 charger 440 6 pack with lots of work made 480rwhp running lean, and had dynoed the engine alone at 577hp, that seems fair for those cars
#27
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NB Canada
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
i am figuring that my numbers are at least 10% over what they should be. there was also a 2008 vette with 427 headders, no cats, cold air, black widdow cam and tune that made 593rwhp wich i figure is about 10% to much. what do you's think?
#28
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Here is link comparing a stock C6 Z06 & I'm going to assumed tuned, then headers. Compare the torque numbers to yours.
http://www.lgmotorsports.com/gallery..._display_media
http://www.lgmotorsports.com/gallery..._display_media
#30
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NB Canada
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
speed demond, could you explain more, how do you see it on my sheet, and how sure are you, could be, i have 1.85 ratio rockers and about 20000 miles on gold springs
#31
TECH Resident
iTrader: (24)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
[QUOTE=BrianSF-GA;16391211]Tell me more about your Mustang dyno numbers before and after your intake and exhaust change. I am just not convinced from the numbers I have seen (this thread aside) that the FAST 102/102 TB is worth the $$$ and if a change from 1-3/4" to a 1-7/8" headers is worth the trouble.
I havent dynod yet but 3 things hav changed intake/exhaust(headrrs back)/sd tune...i say a difference and gain switching from 1¾ to 1⅞ on my 346 and would run nothing less then those on any motor.
I havent dynod yet but 3 things hav changed intake/exhaust(headrrs back)/sd tune...i say a difference and gain switching from 1¾ to 1⅞ on my 346 and would run nothing less then those on any motor.
#32
TECH Resident
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Cartersville, Georgia
Posts: 866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Currently I am working on dialing in my suspension ... engine mods may not be needed to reach my goals.
#33
TECH Resident
iTrader: (24)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
What kind of "Mustang" #'s did you put down before the mods intake / header / exhaust mods to your 403? The 4" bore heads, FAST 102 & 1-7/8" are exactly what I would like to ad, but, I have not seen huge hp/torque per dollar increases to justify it.
Currently I am working on dialing in my suspension ... engine mods may not be needed to reach my goals.
Currently I am working on dialing in my suspension ... engine mods may not be needed to reach my goals.
Idk what mustang dyno it is tuned at slowhawk. With a untouched 92/92, lpe maf, 3½ single cutout made 519/474
#34
TECH Resident
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Cartersville, Georgia
Posts: 866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
519/474 through the S60?? Those are great #'s on a Mustang dyno vs. a DynoJet dyno!!! You shouldn't be jealous at all by the OP's #'s. Any ET's with the new or old setup?
#35
TECH Resident
iTrader: (24)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Its ok i always like seeing the power #'s. But went 11.2 @128 old setup, car weighing in at 3775 me in it shitty 60' needed shocks in the rear so the suspention was squating but then unloading cause it to spin ...gota get this thing tuned on the dyno now then maybe a track day