Dyno Results After NEW FAST 92 Install .
08-13-2012, 03:18 PM
#21
-
- Yep it was cleand up a little on the dyno , I know 13HP & 10TQ LOL . . but I think between the 3.23 gears & 295 rear tires might have lost a quite a bit , also it was a humid day my tuner said not too expect too see a huge difference because there is more water than air in the air & the car might be making more power but its just not going to show on the dyno -
- Yep it was cleand up a little on the dyno , I know 13HP & 10TQ LOL . . but I think between the 3.23 gears & 295 rear tires might have lost a quite a bit , also it was a humid day my tuner said not too expect too see a huge difference because there is more water than air in the air & the car might be making more power but its just not going to show on the dyno -
I have no before and after dyno's just timelips that show I picked up just over a 1/10th in the 1/4.
08-14-2012, 06:58 PM
#23
this has been run in the ground. any gains are good gains with those mods. where the fasts really start to shine is when you start flowing some serious air. For a boosted guy such as myself, the gains from a ls6 intake to a fast 102mm would be noticeable. opening the cutouts will prob lose tq, but increase the hp, and make it pull up top which is where the motor is living. I mean you only need so much tq to make a decent 60 foot.
if you ever decide to have it painted. silverghost aka powderpro is the guy to call.
hes doing my 102/102
if you ever decide to have it painted. silverghost aka powderpro is the guy to call.
hes doing my 102/102
08-15-2012, 02:43 AM
#24
I understand that the FAST potential opens up with larger cubes, cam, etc., but I am not arguing that. In this case, it didn't seem like a wise mod to do at this stage.
I am not knocking on you OP personally, jus' a rant about FAST intakes' popularity in general.
08-15-2012, 11:11 AM
#25
I don't get it. I'm more of a best "bang-for-buck" kinda guy so I don't understand why some guys have a hard time justifying an underdrive pulley for 5-10 horses but a FAST setup is considered a good investment. There was a time when people were ridiculed for opting for an Meziere electronic water pump for the mere average of 8 horses at 600-700 bucks but now when someone drops around a grand for 13 horses, everyone pats him on the back?
I understand that the FAST potential opens up with larger cubes, cam, etc., but I am not arguing that. In this case, it didn't seem like a wise mod to do at this stage.
I am not knocking on you OP personally, jus' a rant about FAST intakes' popularity in general.
I understand that the FAST potential opens up with larger cubes, cam, etc., but I am not arguing that. In this case, it didn't seem like a wise mod to do at this stage.
I am not knocking on you OP personally, jus' a rant about FAST intakes' popularity in general.
Lets be happy for him,it is his thread after all
08-15-2012, 11:30 AM
#26
Your going to see the intake really compliment a cam swap as then it will REALLY benefit from the added air. Dont listen to these guys saying 13 HP isnt much. With stock cam, thats significant. With a good camshaft with lift around .600, you will have gains about an additional 25-30 whp over a stock LS1 intake and 15-20 over an LS6.
The following users liked this post:
offaxis (04-19-2023)
08-15-2012, 11:32 AM
#27
you can only get so caught up in peak numbers anyways. Look how much better it carries in the upper rpm, that will only get more and more dramatic with a cam and especially heads/cam.
__________________
800-456-0211 / PM / Facebook
WHIPPLE Superchargers, Procharger, Magnuson, Powerbond Sale, HPTuners packages!, Trickflow, AFR, PRC, CHE Trunion upgrade, $100 7.400" pushrod set, Custom Cam of your choice
800-456-0211 / PM / Facebook
WHIPPLE Superchargers, Procharger, Magnuson, Powerbond Sale, HPTuners packages!, Trickflow, AFR, PRC, CHE Trunion upgrade, $100 7.400" pushrod set, Custom Cam of your choice
08-15-2012, 07:43 PM
#29
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Barrie , Ontairo , Canada
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't get it. I'm more of a best "bang-for-buck" kinda guy so I don't understand why some guys have a hard time justifying an underdrive pulley for 5-10 horses but a FAST setup is considered a good investment. There was a time when people were ridiculed for opting for an Meziere electronic water pump for the mere average of 8 horses at 600-700 bucks but now when someone drops around a grand for 13 horses, everyone pats him on the back?
I understand that the FAST potential opens up with larger cubes, cam, etc., but I am not arguing that. In this case, it didn't seem like a wise mod to do at this stage.
I am not knocking on you OP personally, jus' a rant about FAST intakes' popularity in general.
I understand that the FAST potential opens up with larger cubes, cam, etc., but I am not arguing that. In this case, it didn't seem like a wise mod to do at this stage.
I am not knocking on you OP personally, jus' a rant about FAST intakes' popularity in general.
One reason why I did`nt go with the LS6 was the EGR as I wanted to keep my emissions , for now anyways . Your going to see the intake really compliment a cam swap as then it will REALLY benefit from the added air. Dont listen to these guys saying 13 HP isnt much. With stock cam, thats significant. With a good camshaft with lift around .600, you will have gains about an additional 25-30 whp over a stock LS1 intake and 15-20 over an LS6.
So I`ve come up with a list of parts for next season .
-TSP TR224R or a 228R 112 LSA Cam kit , not sure witch one is better for emisions ?
-SLP UDP
-SLP Oil pump & Timing Chain
-COMP Cams Pro Magnum Rocker Kit - 1:75 Ratio ?
-Yank 3000 Stall ?
-B&M Trans Cooler
Now I`m not sure if this combo is a one good or will work so. . . .?
And later down the road maybe some AFR 210`s
Thanks for everyone`s thoughs & opinions about the FAST intake manifold .
08-16-2012, 03:00 AM
#32
I don't get it. I'm more of a best "bang-for-buck" kinda guy so I don't understand why some guys have a hard time justifying an underdrive pulley for 5-10 horses but a FAST setup is considered a good investment. There was a time when people were ridiculed for opting for an Meziere electronic water pump for the mere average of 8 horses at 600-700 bucks but now when someone drops around a grand for 13 horses, everyone pats him on the back?
I understand that the FAST potential opens up with larger cubes, cam, etc., but I am not arguing that. In this case, it didn't seem like a wise mod to do at this stage.
I am not knocking on you OP personally, jus' a rant about FAST intakes' popularity in general.
I understand that the FAST potential opens up with larger cubes, cam, etc., but I am not arguing that. In this case, it didn't seem like a wise mod to do at this stage.
I am not knocking on you OP personally, jus' a rant about FAST intakes' popularity in general.
08-16-2012, 03:06 AM
#33
your going to see the intake really compliment a cam swap as then it will really benefit from the added air. Dont listen to these guys saying 13 hp isnt much. With stock cam, thats significant. With a good camshaft with lift around .600, you will have gains about an additional 25-30 whp over a stock ls1 intake and 15-20 over an ls6.
10-03-2012, 05:36 AM
#34
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Mesa,az
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have a close setup as you how do u Like your obxr's gains after install? Didn't feel like a solid pair of 1 7/8s or anything but definitely worth the price and value... Any issues with yours?
10-03-2012, 09:21 AM
#35
I don't get it. I'm more of a best "bang-for-buck" kinda guy so I don't understand why some guys have a hard time justifying an underdrive pulley for 5-10 horses but a FAST setup is considered a good investment. There was a time when people were ridiculed for opting for an Meziere electronic water pump for the mere average of 8 horses at 600-700 bucks but now when someone drops around a grand for 13 horses, everyone pats him on the back?
I understand that the FAST potential opens up with larger cubes, cam, etc., but I am not arguing that. In this case, it didn't seem like a wise mod to do at this stage.
I am not knocking on you OP personally, jus' a rant about FAST intakes' popularity in general.
I understand that the FAST potential opens up with larger cubes, cam, etc., but I am not arguing that. In this case, it didn't seem like a wise mod to do at this stage.
I am not knocking on you OP personally, jus' a rant about FAST intakes' popularity in general.
The other thing being something you touched on...he might have only got 13 hp now, but the way it carries up top will greatly compliment a cam setup. The gains will also improve with a better breathing engine. It's a mod that will continue to show it's worth and it isn't a wear item.
As far as the loss down low, on my car even when it was stock stall I noticed no low end loss but over 3500rpm it was a HUGE difference over the ls1 intake.
The price is high, but that's why I bought used. I have under $600 in my intake and TB not including the money I got back selling my stock intake and the rail/injectors that came with the FAST used.
10-26-2012, 03:41 PM
#38
That's interesting that the peak torque number was higher but looks like you def lost some torque under the curve, like the fast is really peak oriented compared to the flat ls6 intake. I would brt it will be faster on the track but slightly less responsive on the street at lower rpms...it does look bad *** though I will admit
