My 01 z28m6 AI cam & stock 243s
#1
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: durant, ok
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My 01 z28m6 AI cam & stock 243s
Tell me what ypu guys think. Just had the car tuned again and something is a little off. I'll try and give you as much info as possible. 01 z28, m6, stock bottom end, AI 226 234 .600 .600 112lsa. Fresh 243 heads, pace setters, tsp xpipe bullet mufflers, ls6 intake, ported stock tb, stock maf with screen removed, tr55 plugs, msd wires, 10 bolt rear with 4.10s.
Tuner said there is a restriction somewhere because its still pulling 1-2the psi vacuum at wot. Any thoughts on the numbers? I'm not really concerned with racing the dyno, but what do you guys think of the vacuum issue? Suggestions? I thought my numbers were a little low. Thanks in advance - Josh
Tuner said there is a restriction somewhere because its still pulling 1-2the psi vacuum at wot. Any thoughts on the numbers? I'm not really concerned with racing the dyno, but what do you guys think of the vacuum issue? Suggestions? I thought my numbers were a little low. Thanks in advance - Josh
#2
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
that's roughly 470 crank horsepower on essentially a stock ls6 setup. figure an ls6 in a vette runs a claimed 405 hp at the crank, so you picked up 65 on a relatively small crank, longtubes, and a tune. I'm no tuner by any means so i'll keep my comments away from the thread in terms of trying to read the graph. Also, from the research I've done, the split in duration on that cam looks like it would be something to suit the ls3 heads better. Did AI suggest that cam, or anyone else?
Numbers don't seem too bad regardless though, and the torque looks curve looks nice and flat and 300 rwtq at 2500 rpms has to feel pretty good
also looks a little warm, but nothing too crazy.
Numbers don't seem too bad regardless though, and the torque looks curve looks nice and flat and 300 rwtq at 2500 rpms has to feel pretty good
also looks a little warm, but nothing too crazy.
#3
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (5)
Tuner said there is a restriction somewhere because its still pulling 1-2the psi vacuum at wot.
So given that your kPa reading is not really the problem of where your power is at, I would look elsewhere mainly the tune. Looking at the AFR, it seems to go all the way down to 12.0 at peak torque...which is a little excessive. My bet is the tune is slightly off.
But as you said I wouldn't worry too much about the power output as long as the tune is ok and the car pulls nicely.
#5
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: durant, ok
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for all the input guys. The tuner gave me the kpa reading but i don't remember what it was. I do not know much about tuning or those things. He pulled the lid and looked everything over and even did a pull with the airfilter out. He is a VERY reputable tuner in the area and said the tune was spot on but idk. I wonder how much power that vacuum restriction is leaving on the table?
Trending Topics
#15
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: durant, ok
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The heads were barely skimmed and 7.4 pushrods were used. That gave a touch over 2 1/2 rounds to 22 ft lbs if i remember right.
I made it to the track and it trapped 115, same as with the old cam, a bent valve, and weak springs...
still not sure why its making vacuum at wot
I made it to the track and it trapped 115, same as with the old cam, a bent valve, and weak springs...
still not sure why its making vacuum at wot