Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

2011 Camaro, LS3, 260cc AI heads, Fast 102/90, LS3 Street Heat Stage 2/Kooks/GMPP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-11-2012, 10:49 AM
  #1  
FormerVendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Sales@Tick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mount Airy, NC
Posts: 7,480
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Default 2011 Camaro, LS3, 260cc AI heads, Fast 102/90, LS3 Street Heat Stage 2/Kooks/GMPP

This customer first of all needs to be applauded for one thing...his service to our country. He is as we speak gearing up for his return home from Afghanistan. He has put his life on the line for all of us to enjoy our freedoms as United States Citizens and should be called a hero no matter his duties. It is people like Charles that allow us to afford the freedoms we have today in this great country of ours we take for granted so often. SO for that, Charles, I and everyone at Tick Performance thanks you for your service.

On to Charles' car...it is a 5th generation 2011 Camaro. It is a 6 speed manual trans with stock rear gears. The modifications Charles' car has when he brought it to us was:
TSP 231/236 cam
Kooks 1x7/8" headers that are connected to the factory 2x1/2" H-pipe
GMPP Cat-back exhaust "off-road version" no cats

Charles had one goal and that was to make 500rwhp no if's ands or butts. I was tasked with achieving this and proposed a good plan of attack for Charles and his Camaro.

We decided on Advanced Inductions "budget" port work which includes fully CNC porting the exhaust runners, and CNC machining the valve seat & bowl area of the intake port. The remainder of the intake port, and the combustion chamber are left as cast. AI also does a valve job and milled the heads .015" for us to achieve an 11.0:1 compression ratio. This put us a little tighter on the PTV, but still enough clearance to be safe with the cam we are using.

The cam is our new LS3 "Street Heat Stage 2" that I designed which specs out at 231/242 .617"/.592" 113+4. I have an alternate version with different lobes that I use for L92 and L99 headed motors with the heavier solid stem intake valve which the LS3 does not have. Also the "Street Heat" cam we will be marketing uses a LXL exhaust lobe and Charles cam utilizes an Extreme RPM. I like trying different things sometimes just to see the result and this was definitely a good one!

We topped it off with a LSXR 102mm Fast intake and we are still using the factory 90mm LS3 throttle body along with a Cold Air Inductions intake. We also added a SLP 25% under drive pulley which rounded out the modifications.

Although we didn't baseline it with the 231/236 cam it had a very nice idle to it and was definitely noticeable, but nothing ground shaking. We wanted to keep that idle quality while making it just slightly more aggressive. Here are the results:

SAE-504/463:


STD-515/474:


I am very pleased with the results and I know Charles will be too when he returns home in a week. I want to say a huge thank you to Phil@Advanced Induction for an BAD *** set of cylinder heads. This power number would not of been achievable without his port work. I really wouldn't consider anyone else but him for any of our port work on stock castings at our shop. Not only that, but this port program is only 795.00 dollars and is very budget friendly. This port program is right at home on a stock cubic inch motor and really brings out the potential in these castings.

Another thing I am impressed with is the torque, it's making 430rwtq at 4000rpm!!! I haven't ridden in the car yet, but I'm sure it's going to be a handful even at 4000lbs. curb weight. The idle is definitely noticeable, but isn't so aggressive that it shakes your teeth out.

Thanks for looking and we can duplicate these results ANY day of the week, just bring your car on down to Tick Performance!

Last edited by Sales@Tick; 12-16-2012 at 09:16 PM.
Old 12-11-2012, 11:00 AM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Tainted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 8,425
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

nice job!!

500rwhp jsut a few years ago was unthinkable with stock cubes. goes to show how much cam and heads have come in such a short time
Old 12-11-2012, 12:23 PM
  #3  
FormerVendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Sales@Tick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mount Airy, NC
Posts: 7,480
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tainted
nice job!!

500rwhp jsut a few years ago was unthinkable with stock cubes. goes to show how much cam and heads have come in such a short time
I give all the credit to Phil@AI on this one, I'm just the dumb cam guy...

I made a similar comment earlier that if you had told me 5 years ago that you could make 500rwhp with a 231 degree intake lobe, I'd of laughed at you. Even more so would I of laughed at you if you would of said it was attainable with a 376 cubic inch engine.

Last edited by Sales@Tick; 12-11-2012 at 04:06 PM.
Old 12-11-2012, 03:32 PM
  #4  
On The Tree
 
weldermike27408's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 188
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

impressive as hell.... stock cubes , mildly touched LS3 heads , headers , etc.... when he's home and settled in you should mention matchporting and a 102 TB to see what happens....
Old 12-11-2012, 04:05 PM
  #5  
FormerVendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Sales@Tick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mount Airy, NC
Posts: 7,480
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by weldermike27408
impressive as hell.... stock cubes , mildly touched LS3 heads , headers , etc.... when he's home and settled in you should mention matchporting and a 102 TB to see what happens....
I think with a 102mm TB, a real aftermarket 3" ORX pipe, 3" exhaust and port matching his intake he could see 520rwhp easily. Hell it still has resonators in the exhaust before the damn GMPP mufflers!!! GOT to be a restriction there also.
Old 12-11-2012, 04:05 PM
  #6  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
IllusionalTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Wtg tick, these guys building some nice combos.. Nice to see no cookie cutter ****... Martin get us some ****, we need vids!
Old 12-11-2012, 04:53 PM
  #7  
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 138 Likes on 115 Posts

Default

GJ Martin. What would the LXL lobe had accomplished vs the RPM? LXL has more duration at .200 right?

Trending Topics

Old 12-11-2012, 07:20 PM
  #8  
FormerVendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Sales@Tick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mount Airy, NC
Posts: 7,480
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by IllusionalTA
Wtg tick, these guys building some nice combos.. Nice to see no cookie cutter ****... Martin get us some ****, we need vids!
Thanks man, I think we can really improve upon the numbers too if the customer wants. If he gives me the go ahead ORX is going on, resonators off and a real exhaust set-up whatever it ends up being will be utilized.

I'll take my good camera to work tomorrow and get some idle videos. Yea I could of put a huge rowdy cam that had horrible PTV and drivability and surged everywhere that made 15-20 more rwhp or I could have nearly 450rwtq at 3600rpm and much nicer driving manners. Besides that's what the Polluter for LS3's is for.
Originally Posted by JakeFusion™
GJ Martin. What would the LXL lobe had accomplished vs the RPM? LXL has more duration at .200 right?
In this case, I don't think it would of done much, but I won't know really until I test some more set-ups with the LXL exhaust lobe. It would be interesting to see how the extra lobe lift affected the curve and power numbers along with the added duration at .200" as you pointed out.
Old 12-13-2012, 02:20 PM
  #9  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (21)
 
yonerhottlt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sacramento Ca
Posts: 619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wow...another great LS3 build making stroker-like numbers. Impressed to say the lease...
Old 12-13-2012, 04:05 PM
  #10  
FormerVendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Sales@Tick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mount Airy, NC
Posts: 7,480
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by yonerhottlt1
Wow...another great LS3 build making stroker-like numbers. Impressed to say the lease...
Honestly, I used to not be impressed by the LS3 heads...at all. I had seen so many set-ups that should of made big power, fall way short of anything impressive. Then I started to mess with them myself, and had some pretty good results so when this customer approached me wanting a 500rwhp H/C/I LS3...I knew I could give him a DD streetable 500rwhp set-up easily with room to grow on top of that.

What you see is what you get, and the devil is in the details that is for sure. Thanks for the compliments.
Old 12-16-2012, 09:25 AM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
Pray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Great job bro. Hope your guy gets home soon. You can't beat AI and that size cam. Like you said, 500rw all day.
Old 12-16-2012, 10:55 AM
  #12  
TECH Enthusiast
 
bozzhawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: REALITY
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin@Tick
Honestly, I used to not be impressed by the LS3 heads...at all. I had seen so many set-ups that should of made big power, fall way short of anything impressive. Then I started to mess with them myself, and had some pretty good results so when this customer approached me wanting a 500rwhp H/C/I LS3...
Not you? Not the kid? finally seeing the light? LOL

My My My the tables have turned.
Old 12-16-2012, 11:05 AM
  #13  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (30)
 
djfury05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaufort, SC
Posts: 3,428
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Am I the only one that thinks its kind of weak? Wasn't there a cam only LS3 that made over 500rwhp in the Dyno section not to long ago?
Old 12-16-2012, 11:09 AM
  #14  
MASS seller approved
iTrader: (148)
 
low2001gmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: ELSA, South TEXAS (956) 802-7700
Posts: 1,426
Received 133 Likes on 89 Posts

Default

impressive...big applaud to martin at tick and phil at ai for sure...but big thanx to charles for serving the u.s.a.
Old 12-16-2012, 08:57 PM
  #15  
FormerVendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Sales@Tick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mount Airy, NC
Posts: 7,480
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by djfury05
Am I the only one that think its kind of weak? Wasn't there a cam only LS3 that made o 500rwhp in the Dyno section not to long ago?
It went 120 mph in the quarter in a vette which as you know is much less than the 527 the dyno read.

Can you get 500 cam only out of a corvette with a ls3 and a cam with twice the over lap, sure. It won't cruise at 60 in 6th with 3.45 gears though. For a dd it's plenty Stout.

We had another 5th gen with the same heads, 102 intake with a fast 102 throttle body, arh 1x7/8" headers(turns out charles camaro has 1x3/4" headers not 1x7/8"), arh 3" off road x pipe, arh exhaust with cut outs, an advanced induction 231/238 113+3 cam that made 507 rwhp on another local dyno with the same tune baseline pull on our dyno made 485rwhp so it's a good 20rwhp lower than most and breaks hearts all the time.
Old 12-16-2012, 09:10 PM
  #16  
FormerVendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Sales@Tick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mount Airy, NC
Posts: 7,480
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bozzhawg
Not you? Not the kid? finally seeing the light? LOL

My My My the tables have turned.
Lol yes they can make some good numbers and I always knew I could make power easily with them I just prefer and still do the small port and higher velocity of a cathedral port. The cathedral port stuff is easier to cam and not as specific to overlap as the larger valves of the rectangle ports are.

That said it doesn't take much cam to make power with these heads. They are very sensitive to when the intake valve opens and will have poor driving characteristics if not paid close attention to.
Old 12-16-2012, 09:13 PM
  #17  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Tainted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 8,425
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Nice martin.

Hogging for a second here. Pat G suggested these for my 408, but im unsure of which intake cc to go with. The 260 seems to make less lower down, and shines at the top, but with a ported ls3 intake I dont think I can take advantage. The 255 on the other hand beats the 250 and im thinking my larger cubes can use it? (And i know these are ai heads and not the prc small bore heads) but Im sure you can comment on the velocity part
Advice?

Last edited by Tainted; 12-16-2012 at 09:21 PM.
Old 12-16-2012, 09:47 PM
  #18  
FormerVendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Sales@Tick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mount Airy, NC
Posts: 7,480
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tainted
Nice martin.

Hogging for a second here. Pat G suggested these for my 408, but im unure of which intake cc tosmall go with. The 260 seems to make less lower down, and shines at the top, but with a ported ls3 intake I dont think I can take advantage. The 255 on the other hand beats the 250 and im thinking my larger cubes can use it? (And i know these are ai heads and not the prc small bore heads) but Im sure you can comment on the velocity part
Advice?
Did he suggest after market ls3 heads or factory ls3 heads? I ask this because the factory heads are 262cc stock. PRC and Mast sell small bore ls3 heads that come in the sizes you mentioned. For your application the 250cc head would be my choice. Did he specify the cam for a certain port volume?
Old 12-16-2012, 10:14 PM
  #19  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Tainted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 8,425
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin@Tick
Did he suggest after market ls3 heads or factory ls3 heads? I ask this because the factory heads are 262cc stock. PRC and Mast sell small bore ls3 heads that come in the sizes you mentioned. For your application the 250cc head would be my choice. Did he specify the cam for a certain port volume?
Its the tsp small bore ls3 heads im referring to. I originally asked comparing between the prc 237 and the tfs 235, and then I asked about the 250 ls3 heads, and he said he prefered those to the trick flow. I didnt heckle him anymore beyond that. Im filling out the sheet for his cam spec so that will be based off which heads. I really think the 255s may be the ticket but I always love getting multiple opinions from knowledgeable people.
Old 12-17-2012, 09:18 AM
  #20  
On The Tree
 
therat1989's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nice job tick. I cant believe the power output these LS3s make. My poor little LS2.... Got any idle videos of the car? Im sure tge owner wouldn't mind.


Quick Reply: 2011 Camaro, LS3, 260cc AI heads, Fast 102/90, LS3 Street Heat Stage 2/Kooks/GMPP



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:28 PM.