Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

5.3 cam only - need advice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-14-2016 | 02:18 PM
  #41  
killingsworth73's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Default

i appreciate it Thunderstruck. It was street tuned (tweaked from the dyno tune) while driving very moderately. From a 25-30mph+ roll, throttle is great. I am taking it back up to have him check out bottom end tuning. Might go MAF. Not sure the thought behind no MAF other than I was told it is more important on boost vs N/A tuning.
Old 09-20-2016 | 11:57 PM
  #42  
kingtal0n's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,261
Likes: 18
From: florida
Default

Originally Posted by foxsl
Says that while there are tons of power glide and th350/th400 street cars people drive to and from the track.....and it's 2016 not the 80s
I see the problem here. You guys think its ok to throw money in the trash due to poor cruising economy. Thats all this is- a cruising economy point of view I am sharing. The 3-speed stuff is all terrible for taking 3000 miles journeys across country. That is why it is not a "street car". My definition of a street car is a reliable one... silent... and goes 3k miles with reasonable fuel savings (or whatever, 150k 250k and so forth).

Just because I can light a pile of money on fire in my front yard each day driving a 3-speed... doesn't make it a smart decision. But yeah , of course you can do it! do whatever you want...
Old 09-21-2016 | 12:00 AM
  #43  
kingtal0n's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,261
Likes: 18
From: florida
Default

Originally Posted by LLLosingit
Yep, You confirmed it....You're still an idiot! The transmission alone has little to do with it. It doesn't matter if it's two speed three speed or 13 speed... final drive ratio is all that matters.
I could run something direct drive and the final drive ratio would determine if it's suitable for highway speeds or not. You can run a powerglide with 2.90 gear and a tall tire and cruise the highway just fine or you can run an overdrive trans with 3.91 gears and low profile tires and have a similar final drive ratio. You night want to quit posting before you make a complete fool of yourself..... Not that you haven't already.
The trans is everything. I'd rather have a 8-speed than a 3-speed. Why do you think the auto manufacturers are moving toward more gears? Lol they are all idiots right? Silly them, they should just change the rear gear ratio! Think of all the money they would save! Quick, call them and tell them they are idiots for adding more gears!
Old 09-21-2016 | 12:12 AM
  #44  
kingtal0n's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,261
Likes: 18
From: florida
Default

Originally Posted by 1970camaroRS
More stall on a 3-speed car will make it slower? What?
Yes, I have experience with this. Went from a stock converter to a 10" 3800stall TCI in my 1983 Camaro behind a 355 N/A and 2.73 rear gear, and it got dog slower, night and day. The converter wasn't able to do... whatever it is they do when the gear is right. I'm not a converter expert but I am sure you can ask one why it happened, the trick is gearing needs to match. plain and simple.


A 3-speed car with 3.73s hitting 6,000rpm in the 1/4 is a shame? That's 132mph with a 28" tire. Good thing LS motors go to 7,000 or more, because that's 155mph. With the same tire, RPM at 60mph is about 2700rpm. Not too far off what I get with 4.30 gears in 4th in my 4L80e.
If the vehicle is used for racing purposes only you dial the rear gear to max MPH and RPM for the intended application (1/8, 1/4, 1/2, 1, 2 miles racing). You can't just throw random stats for 1/4 mile cars only and say its a "shame" or whatever.

Street cars.... the rules change. If you truly favor economy, you have way more work to do than just choosing the best gear for max MPH/RPM in final racing gear. You need to actually test the car, drive it at different speeds and find the best(low) injector duty cycle, with the highest vacuum signal, the best EGT and so forth. There is alot of calculation involved. The weight and rolling resistance of the vehicle determines how much gear you can sneak out from under it (to reduce engine RPM) without ruining its performance in the (1/8 1/4 1/2 etc) whatever the application is when its not just driving around economically.

No one drives a 3-speed cross country? Yes they do, every day. Nobody will drive it 1000 miles with 15mpg? Millions of people do this. Millions.
And a huge waste that is, something I do not support or advise, but I am poor so that is probably why. In my mind nobody is that wasteful; thus they do not exist as examples (they are poor role models for your own vehicle if you intend to achieve economy value points) try not to learn from poor examples, it leads to terrible ideas being fostered by the masses. or something.
Old 09-21-2016 | 12:17 AM
  #45  
pozesd99''s Avatar
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
Default

^^^ why are you such an *******? Lol
Old 09-21-2016 | 12:39 AM
  #46  
killingsworth73's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Default

Have none of you been on a powertour? Shitloads of 3speed autos. Cruising long distances.

4speed autos will fit in my car, but the 6 speed, 8 sleed etc, not even close. If you want an economy car, go get a prius or a volt.

My car is a street car, with a th400. With the 3.08s I can get 18mpg if I want, which is as good as I did in a 2010 Camaro with a 6 speed.

But I'm glad the thread got taken over to fight about mpg. Didnt realize this was the prius forum.
Old 09-21-2016 | 01:15 AM
  #47  
LLLosingit's Avatar
TECH Junkie
10 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 3,837
Likes: 476
From: Iowa
Default

Originally Posted by kingtal0n
The trans is everything. I'd rather have a 8-speed than a 3-speed. Why do you think the auto manufacturers are moving toward more gears? Lol they are all idiots right? Silly them, they should just change the rear gear ratio! Think of all the money they would save! Quick, call them and tell them they are idiots for adding more gears!
They are moving toward more gears because they have to try to satisfy the government and tree huggers. They have to get better economy and less emissions at the same time. Not everything is for performance and if you knew more about the evolution of motor vehicles you'd know this, It's been happening since the late 60's.
Old 09-21-2016 | 05:24 AM
  #48  
1970camaroRS's Avatar
10 Second Club

iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 4
From: Everett, WA
Default

Originally Posted by pozesd99'
^^^ why are you such an *******? Lol
He's simply the most amazing idiot I've ever seen. He and Karl Pilkington should travel the globe together.
Old 09-21-2016 | 05:46 PM
  #49  
foxsl's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 578
Likes: 15
Default

Originally Posted by 1970camaroRS
He's simply the most amazing idiot I've ever seen. He and Karl Pilkington should travel the globe together.
Karl Pilkington is amazing, I never laughed so hard due to someone that is genuinely himself. The moaning of life is his new series.
Old 09-21-2016 | 08:02 PM
  #50  
killingsworth73's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Default

Through my th400 I can cruise at 50mph at 2200 rpm, and also hit 100mph on 2nd at 6200rpm with my 3.08s.
Old 09-22-2016 | 12:13 AM
  #51  
SuperSport01's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast

 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 709
Likes: 1
From: 336 NC
Default

It sounds like you need more gear to wake that car up. Like a 3.36, 3.55, 3.70.
Old 09-23-2016 | 01:38 AM
  #52  
kingtal0n's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,261
Likes: 18
From: florida
Default

This is a summary of gears, it outlines everything I could think of that might be important to have a viewpoint on transmissions in 2016 in general for all vehicles, whether performance or economy biased, or both. The fuel economy aspect of tuning is considered "advanced", injector phasing and lean air fuel ratios with considerable timing tuning (via logs with EGT and injector duty while using cruise control) keeps the combustion chamber and plug cleaner (less carbon byproduct) and help the engine produce less wasted energy in temp rise (the engine can stay cooler) and of course the better fuel use per time (gallons per hour or miles per gallon etc..) are all benefits to economy tuning (its not just for Priuses. It is for every engine that you care about).

Name:  talonstransview_zpsfvgk3biw.jpg
Views: 436
Size:  360.0 KB
Old 09-23-2016 | 06:06 AM
  #53  
1970camaroRS's Avatar
10 Second Club

iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 4
From: Everett, WA
Default

Are you on drugs?
Old 09-23-2016 | 09:39 AM
  #54  
bisscrac's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 14
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by kingtal0n
Yeah, years ago. You don't see the 3-speeds anymore though, probably since 1984 I guess? Since then, its 4 speeds, 5 speeds, heck 7 or 8 speeds. The 3-speed is long gone. You don't jump in one of those cars and drive it across country; you can't expect to do much more than drive around your city with one.

Thus, dedicated track(city) car. Nobody will drive it 1000 miles with 15mpg; that is my cut off.
Ever heard HOT ROD drag week ?
Old 09-23-2016 | 10:02 AM
  #55  
bisscrac's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 14
Likes: 1
Default

original poster. you ever read this article ?
http://www.hotrod.com/articles/ls-cam-test-comparison/

kinda goes into detail about what your experiencing.
Old 09-23-2016 | 01:05 PM
  #56  
kingtal0n's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,261
Likes: 18
From: florida
Default

Originally Posted by bisscrac
Ever heard HOT ROD drag week ?
I meant, they don't put them into actual cars you buy new anymore. Not that you couldn't find them lol. I know you can throw a rock and hit a 3-speed.


Originally Posted by 1970camaroRS
Are you on drugs?

rofl like I would be ok with doing this without caffeine and so forth
Old 09-29-2016 | 09:03 PM
  #57  
DirtyS30's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Default

Less gears does not necessitate a faster vehicle. The problem is your think is eco minded. Most of the 3 speed people are all about most efficient power for the least cost. Your correct in thinking that fuel economy is affected by the additional gearing. Generally have overdrive will lower the rpm into a more efficient area but it has to do with the rear end ratio as well. How about your 8 speed with 5.13 gears vs the 3 speed with 2.29 ratio?

What transmission eats up more power via frictional losses or just amount of extra weight? A 2 speed power glide or the 8 speed in your odd diagram.
Old 09-29-2016 | 09:23 PM
  #58  
killingsworth73's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Default

Got a retune 2k rpm and under. Added more timing and a little fuel. Roasts the tires away now and much livlier.
Old 09-29-2016 | 10:21 PM
  #59  
LLLosingit's Avatar
TECH Junkie
10 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 3,837
Likes: 476
From: Iowa
Default

Originally Posted by killingsworth73
Got a retune 2k rpm and under. Added more timing and a little fuel. Roasts the tires away now and much livlier.
Good to hear, Now maybe kingtal0n will quit trying share his infinite wisdom!
Old 09-30-2016 | 12:40 AM
  #60  
Husker98's Avatar
On The Tree
10 Year Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 121
Likes: 1
From: St. Edward, NE
Default

Originally Posted by killingsworth73
Got a retune 2k rpm and under. Added more timing and a little fuel. Roasts the tires away now and much livlier.
Glad to hear you got it figured out!


Quick Reply: 5.3 cam only - need advice



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:11 AM.