BTR stage 2 cam /Dorman LS2 intake dyno results...
#1
BTR stage 2 cam /Dorman LS2 intake dyno results...
Stock LS1, M6, 10 bolt, TSP 243 stage 1 heads, Dorman LS2 intake, 92mm TB, TSP 1 3/4 headers and catted Y. 400 rwhp, car pulled all the way to 6600 rpm and didn't nose over. Torque was fairly flat. Here's where things get screwy. My mechanic was disappointed with 400 rwhp so he looked at another car he dynod last year. That car made 385 rwhp with stock heads and a BTR stage 3 cam. When he pulled the file up, it now read 351 rwhp. Obviously something is screwy with the dyno. I expected somewhere between 390-420 rwhp so I'm in that ball park range.
STD correction was 408 rwhp
Sorry, I don't have a printout yet.
STD correction was 408 rwhp
Sorry, I don't have a printout yet.
Last edited by wannafbody; 05-25-2018 at 11:33 PM.
The following users liked this post:
madmike9396 (08-23-2021)
#4
Traps can be misleading too. Depending on traction. Most people will say other wise I know. I was spinning terribly to a 117mph trap on some 275/40/17 drag radials. Swapped to some 16in bias ply cheater slicks and picked up 4mph.
#7
I agree. I had always heard, "spinning inflated your traps". So at the time I was kind of disappointed in my cars performance if the 117mph trap was inflated by the spinning lol.
Trending Topics
#8
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,452
Received 1,850 Likes
on
1,151 Posts
My mph also increased going to bias due to getting rid of the spinning.
#12
TECH Addict
really doesnt seem far off. the 1 3/4 headers MIGHT hold you back a hair. but there's so many variables when strapping on to a dyno. if you trust your tuner then dont worry about 408 rwhp. how does it feel SOTP?
#13
Car feels strong from 1500 to 6600.
I cut the bottom of the airbox to allow a bit more fresh air in. Might be worth a couple HP.
I might upgrade the lid to a 98mm to match the 85mm MAF.
After researching, dynos for almost identical setups are ranging from 400 to 444rwhp.
#14
Have you had a trip to the track yet? My 5.3 with stock 862 heads, ls6 intake, BTR stage 2 ls1/2 cam, hooker 1 7/8 longtube headers, ory, flowmaster cat back made 396/396 through a 6 speed. I never took it to the track but made few pulls in Mexico and it ran strong for what the setup was. I agree with the above statements though, wouldn't get caught up in dyno numbers. My cam only Trans Am made 346rwhp on one dyno and 331rwhp on another and it ran 11.51, then threw a chris1313 a/c ram air on it and ran 11.38 and backed it up with an 11.37 in 92 degree heat so numbers don't really mean a hole lot.
#15
TECH Addict
iTrader: (57)
No clutch slippage. My mechanic was actually impressed for 90K.
Car feels strong from 1500 to 6600.
I cut the bottom of the airbox to allow a bit more fresh air in. Might be worth a couple HP.
I might upgrade the lid to a 98mm to match the 85mm MAF.
After researching, dynos for almost identical setups are ranging from 400 to 444rwhp.
Car feels strong from 1500 to 6600.
I cut the bottom of the airbox to allow a bit more fresh air in. Might be worth a couple HP.
I might upgrade the lid to a 98mm to match the 85mm MAF.
After researching, dynos for almost identical setups are ranging from 400 to 444rwhp.
#16
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
No clutch slippage. My mechanic was actually impressed for 90K.
Car feels strong from 1500 to 6600.
I cut the bottom of the airbox to allow a bit more fresh air in. Might be worth a couple HP.
I might upgrade the lid to a 98mm to match the 85mm MAF.
After researching, dynos for almost identical setups are ranging from 400 to 444rwhp.
Car feels strong from 1500 to 6600.
I cut the bottom of the airbox to allow a bit more fresh air in. Might be worth a couple HP.
I might upgrade the lid to a 98mm to match the 85mm MAF.
After researching, dynos for almost identical setups are ranging from 400 to 444rwhp.
That's cause dyno readings in STD read higher vs SAE. Real tuners use SAE. Flakey ricer tuner use STD so it reads higher. So they'll start baselines in SAE and final #s in STD so it looks like they found more hp gains in the tune.
The following users liked this post:
wannafbody (06-29-2021)
#17
Please post cam specs when saying what u have. Not everyone knows them nor has the time to RESEARCH info that pertains to YOUR. thread
thanks
jim
thanks
jim
#18
Cam is common, can look it up the on the BTR website..
As far as correction, yes, SAE is standard. Make sure it is SAE correction for all runs. Also important to note the GAINS, not just peak numbers, as even SAE dynos will vary some.
Numbers sound decent to me, though 400 rwhp with manual is under 500 bhp..
Can easily dyno at another dyno for a comparison
As far as correction, yes, SAE is standard. Make sure it is SAE correction for all runs. Also important to note the GAINS, not just peak numbers, as even SAE dynos will vary some.
Numbers sound decent to me, though 400 rwhp with manual is under 500 bhp..
Can easily dyno at another dyno for a comparison
#19
I've since upgraded the clutch to a Diamond stage 2 due to the LS6 clutch stiicking to the floor. Grabbed a FT98 lid and redid the exhaust with a TSP catback. Proably picked up a few extra hp. Haven't taken it to the track.
My tuner found an issue after the original dyno session. The TB wasn't opening completely. That was fixed but not redyno'd.
227/234 .614 .576
My tuner found an issue after the original dyno session. The TB wasn't opening completely. That was fixed but not redyno'd.
227/234 .614 .576
Last edited by wannafbody; 07-05-2021 at 09:30 PM.