Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

BTR stage 2 cam /Dorman LS2 intake dyno results...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-23-2018, 04:12 PM
  #1  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
wannafbody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 4,749
Received 848 Likes on 649 Posts

Default BTR stage 2 cam /Dorman LS2 intake dyno results...

Stock LS1, M6, 10 bolt, TSP 243 stage 1 heads, Dorman LS2 intake, 92mm TB, TSP 1 3/4 headers and catted Y. 400 rwhp, car pulled all the way to 6600 rpm and didn't nose over. Torque was fairly flat. Here's where things get screwy. My mechanic was disappointed with 400 rwhp so he looked at another car he dynod last year. That car made 385 rwhp with stock heads and a BTR stage 3 cam. When he pulled the file up, it now read 351 rwhp. Obviously something is screwy with the dyno. I expected somewhere between 390-420 rwhp so I'm in that ball park range.

STD correction was 408 rwhp

Sorry, I don't have a printout yet.

Last edited by wannafbody; 05-25-2018 at 11:33 PM.
Old 05-23-2018, 04:16 PM
  #2  
"I MAID THEESE"
iTrader: (3)
 
Mavn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,744
Received 675 Likes on 425 Posts

Default

Seems right on the money
Old 05-23-2018, 04:34 PM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
HCI2000SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Dyno numbers mean jack. What it traps at the track will tell you how strong it is
The following users liked this post:
madmike9396 (08-23-2021)
Old 05-23-2018, 05:59 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Jtm2085's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,219
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Traps can be misleading too. Depending on traction. Most people will say other wise I know. I was spinning terribly to a 117mph trap on some 275/40/17 drag radials. Swapped to some 16in bias ply cheater slicks and picked up 4mph.
Old 05-23-2018, 06:20 PM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
HCI2000SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jtm2085
Traps can be misleading too. Depending on traction. Most people will say other wise I know. I was spinning terribly to a 117mph trap on some 275/40/17 drag radials. Swapped to some 16in bias ply cheater slicks and picked up 4mph.
Very true, but as long as the spinning isn't excessive the trap speed shouldn't really suffer
Old 05-23-2018, 06:49 PM
  #6  
TECH Junkie
 
98CayenneT/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: White Bear, Mn
Posts: 3,898
Received 355 Likes on 246 Posts

Default

Any passes that I spin go right in the garbage. If I spin bad enough I just get out of it and try again
Old 05-23-2018, 07:00 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Jtm2085's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,219
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

I agree. I had always heard, "spinning inflated your traps". So at the time I was kind of disappointed in my cars performance if the 117mph trap was inflated by the spinning lol.
Old 05-23-2018, 09:23 PM
  #8  
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Darth_V8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,452
Received 1,850 Likes on 1,151 Posts

Default

My mph also increased going to bias due to getting rid of the spinning.
Old 05-25-2018, 08:53 PM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
99 Black Bird T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,599
Received 1,448 Likes on 1,006 Posts

Default

Wannabody sounds like good results thanks for sharing.

What clutch do you have in the car?
Old 05-25-2018, 11:03 PM
  #10  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
wannafbody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 4,749
Received 848 Likes on 649 Posts

Default

LS6 clutch with 90K miles
Old 05-27-2018, 07:55 PM
  #11  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
99 Black Bird T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,599
Received 1,448 Likes on 1,006 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by wannafbody
LS6 clutch with 90K miles
Any hint of slipping? A fresh LS6 should hold 400 whp. My stock LS1 clutch held 418 whp well for a good while but eventually had some slip in the upper rpm under load.
Old 05-27-2018, 08:04 PM
  #12  
TECH Addict
 
brian_rs/ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Texas/Afghanistan
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

really doesnt seem far off. the 1 3/4 headers MIGHT hold you back a hair. but there's so many variables when strapping on to a dyno. if you trust your tuner then dont worry about 408 rwhp. how does it feel SOTP?
Old 05-28-2018, 03:02 PM
  #13  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
wannafbody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 4,749
Received 848 Likes on 649 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 99 Black Bird T/A
Any hint of slipping? A fresh LS6 should hold 400 whp. My stock LS1 clutch held 418 whp well for a good while but eventually had some slip in the upper rpm under load.
No clutch slippage. My mechanic was actually impressed for 90K.

Car feels strong from 1500 to 6600.

I cut the bottom of the airbox to allow a bit more fresh air in. Might be worth a couple HP.

I might upgrade the lid to a 98mm to match the 85mm MAF.

After researching, dynos for almost identical setups are ranging from 400 to 444rwhp.
Old 06-03-2018, 04:12 PM
  #14  
Launching!
 
zboy2012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Attica, IN
Posts: 269
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Have you had a trip to the track yet? My 5.3 with stock 862 heads, ls6 intake, BTR stage 2 ls1/2 cam, hooker 1 7/8 longtube headers, ory, flowmaster cat back made 396/396 through a 6 speed. I never took it to the track but made few pulls in Mexico and it ran strong for what the setup was. I agree with the above statements though, wouldn't get caught up in dyno numbers. My cam only Trans Am made 346rwhp on one dyno and 331rwhp on another and it ran 11.51, then threw a chris1313 a/c ram air on it and ran 11.38 and backed it up with an 11.37 in 92 degree heat so numbers don't really mean a hole lot.
Old 06-03-2018, 07:32 PM
  #15  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (57)
 
ragtopz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ft. Myers, FL
Posts: 2,014
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by wannafbody
No clutch slippage. My mechanic was actually impressed for 90K.

Car feels strong from 1500 to 6600.

I cut the bottom of the airbox to allow a bit more fresh air in. Might be worth a couple HP.

I might upgrade the lid to a 98mm to match the 85mm MAF.

After researching, dynos for almost identical setups are ranging from 400 to 444rwhp.
Get a few good passed in...enter stats into 'Wallace Calculator' and it will very accurately give you the rwhp.
Old 06-28-2021, 03:08 PM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
FU_I_AM_UltraZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Port Richey, FL
Posts: 1,133
Received 26 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by wannafbody
No clutch slippage. My mechanic was actually impressed for 90K.

Car feels strong from 1500 to 6600.

I cut the bottom of the airbox to allow a bit more fresh air in. Might be worth a couple HP.

I might upgrade the lid to a 98mm to match the 85mm MAF.

After researching, dynos for almost identical setups are ranging from 400 to 444rwhp.

That's cause dyno readings in STD read higher vs SAE. Real tuners use SAE. Flakey ricer tuner use STD so it reads higher. So they'll start baselines in SAE and final #s in STD so it looks like they found more hp gains in the tune.
The following users liked this post:
wannafbody (06-29-2021)
Old 06-29-2021, 02:12 PM
  #17  
TECH Senior Member
 
Jimbo1367's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,894
Received 600 Likes on 476 Posts

Default

Please post cam specs when saying what u have. Not everyone knows them nor has the time to RESEARCH info that pertains to YOUR. thread

thanks
jim
Old 06-29-2021, 07:30 PM
  #18  
Staging Lane
 
Marvel127's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Cam is common, can look it up the on the BTR website..

As far as correction, yes, SAE is standard. Make sure it is SAE correction for all runs. Also important to note the GAINS, not just peak numbers, as even SAE dynos will vary some.

Numbers sound decent to me, though 400 rwhp with manual is under 500 bhp..

Can easily dyno at another dyno for a comparison
Old 06-29-2021, 09:05 PM
  #19  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
wannafbody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 4,749
Received 848 Likes on 649 Posts

Default

I've since upgraded the clutch to a Diamond stage 2 due to the LS6 clutch stiicking to the floor. Grabbed a FT98 lid and redid the exhaust with a TSP catback. Proably picked up a few extra hp. Haven't taken it to the track.

My tuner found an issue after the original dyno session. The TB wasn't opening completely. That was fixed but not redyno'd.

227/234 .614 .576

Last edited by wannafbody; 07-05-2021 at 09:30 PM.



Quick Reply: BTR stage 2 cam /Dorman LS2 intake dyno results...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:42 AM.