Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

Hot cam numbers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-09-2018 | 06:36 PM
  #21  
G Atsma's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 21,580
Likes: 3,301
From: Central Cal.
Default

Originally Posted by trilkb
awe come on man, I paid 515 and even asked if there were any discounts! This was like 2 weeks ago, I'm sure I just missed it. I could've bought the good beer!
Hey look at it this way; you saved yourself from a potential hangover.....
Old 10-09-2018 | 07:39 PM
  #22  
HioSSilver's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,977
Likes: 486
From: Winchester, VA
Default

Not bad....some changes in the combo could easily push it over 400whp as it should.
Old 10-09-2018 | 08:07 PM
  #23  
trilkb's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,106
Likes: 78
Default

Eh, 15$ won't matter when it starts this weekend. Waiting on my pcm to come back.

sorry to derail the thread!
Old 10-10-2018 | 08:49 PM
  #24  
dave04da's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: NY
Default

Originally Posted by trilkb
Looks like the "prototype" car had an ls6 intake as well. He said "I have 1 3/4 Long tube headers. off road y, TSP cat back, ls6 intake. It put down 390 hp and 370 tq". So if it had 243's it seems like that wouldve been higher. But its just dyno numbers afterall, who knows maybe the OP will reply lol.

It sucks that on your website the comparison time slips have a 2.0 and a 2.2 60' lol. Guy shouldve got you a 2.0 60 slip!
Its the OP here! Bottom line is different cars, different dynos, different days. It's just a number. This is now my 2nd summer with this cam, and all I can say is its a huge improvement over the GM version of it. This car is so much fun to drive! It drives just as good as the stock cam did but with a nasty idle and so much more power. I have had zero drivability issues or sewing machine noise with this cam.
A guy I work with has a 1999 a4 TA that has a different cam, but was tuned at my same tuner. He put down 412 to and 389 tq. We roll raced twice from 30 mph, and I walked him both times by a car at 90 mph.
All I can say is I would take ths cam all day long over the GM version. Sure there are cams ot there that make more power, but I wanted a "set it and forget it" cam that made good power and was easy on the valve train.... This is it!

Last edited by dave04da; 10-10-2018 at 09:03 PM.
Old 10-11-2018 | 08:46 AM
  #25  
trilkb's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,106
Likes: 78
Default

Originally Posted by dave04da
Its the OP here! Bottom line is different cars, different dynos, different days. It's just a number. Sure there are cams ot there that make more power, but I wanted a "set it and forget it" cam that made good power and was easy on the valve train....
My thoughts exactly. its not worth chasing a dyno number over driveability on a street car, nor is it worth beating up your valvetrain.

Been back to the track?
Old 10-11-2018 | 05:25 PM
  #26  
dave04da's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: NY
Default

No, I didnt make it this year. 3 kids and 70+ hrs a week at work kept me busy. I will hope to make it next year.
Old 10-13-2018 | 08:09 PM
  #27  
trilkb's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,106
Likes: 78
Default

Got my car started 😁. Idle is at around 750, tr6 plugs at .040. Pcmforless tune seems to be good. Stall feels a little more loose vs stock cam. It's relearning still but driving nicely. Haven't gotten on it really, the 2.73 rear needs to go.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:58 AM.