I see all kinds of errors and missing info. I dont like that cam either.

 

Heard the weight doesn't effect it that it's a different set up that would.

 

My lq4, with fast ported 92mm intake and nw tb, ported 241 heads, 3600 stall, 231/235 cam and 373 gears I dynoed 395rwhp on a mustang dyno.

 

If Pat G spec’d the cam, I wouldn’t doubt it. You guys forget you don’t know the parameters Pat G had design the cam.

 

This is questionable.

 

My old 6.2L had a cam almost exactly like that one with unported 241 heads, an LS1 intake, 1-3/4" headers, and 11:1CR. I made over 400whp before 5200RPM with that combo on PatG's Mustang dyno. The cam you have in there is fine, you may just have a dead cylinder or something weird going on with the dyno.

 

I made 305whp on a mustang dyno with a ls1 many years ago. It was lbo. It had shitty mac headers with ory and the stock dual dual, ls1 intake, free mods , ported tb , udp, lid and a granittelli mass air.

Op numbers are very low.

 

If it is load bearing dyno, weight does indeed matter.
Weight is part of how the software calculates the resistance to load on the eddy brake.

 

Doing drivability simulation mode yes. It makes a big difference in the way the dyno loads the car...

There are 2 different ways you can do a pull. One is vehicle simulation that mimic's the car actually going down the track which loads the dyno more. The other doesn't.

For example. I was dynoing a 2000 Corvette and forgot to change the vehicle from the 2015 Challenger I just got done with. There was no change in power numbers changing to the correct vehicle. I wasn't using the simulation dyno mode.

 

Just now got around to messing with it. One of the spark plugs gaps were almost completely closed. #8 cylinder. Not sure how it got that way. That's all I know for now. Too hot to mess with it during the day.

 

So you were down a cylinder in that case good numbers lol

 

It will feel like a different car now