LS2 dyno / displacement question
What I do know:
LS2
ARE 2 stage dry sump system
L92 carb intake
Holley carb
Unknown:
Cubic inches (was thought to be 4" stroker)
Compression (he ran it on 112 leaded, so I will too - no cats, no O2 sensors)
head work (probably something done to it)
cam specs (not stock, not a monster)
So.... I believe it is NOT a 4" stroker based on the 6600 rpm hp peak and the relatively low corresponding torque number.
Dynojet dyno...... 9" rear and a Jerico WC4 trans.
I am not unhappy with the results. Just curious about more info. I am thinking it's more like a stock stroke crank --- anyone agree?
Thoughts?
Thanks
Trans is a dog ring Jerico WC4 4 speed. Road Race trans.
Thanks
That intake will make the torque curve look different than most similar setups with composite long runner intake, so tough to say.
My guess is non optimized 408, down on torque for whatever reason, plus the 9"....
See attached. Just a little surprised I guess.... or maybe the LS3 is really that superior over an LS2 with more work and cubes......
Trending Topics
The heads are WCCH stage 3 L92's...... that's a pretty bad *** head!
http://www.proheads.com/WCCH_L92.html
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I think a stock Ls2 bottom end with nice heads and a medium cam should be in the 475 wheel neighborhood.
I will have the carb info soon when I call Pro Systems back after Thanksgiving. The heads do seem bad ***.... and only intended for engines over 400" which further makes me believe this is a 4" stroker as I was told.
WCCH also confirmed today that the chamber us 75cc. So maybe the compression is not ideal. I dunno.
I am pretty sure now that it is a 4" stroker as the previous owner recalled.... he just didn't have receipts or much for records. Was built many years ago. But he is a trustworthy guy and the rest of the car is legit.
WCCH also confirmed today that the chamber us 75cc. So maybe the compression is not ideal. I dunno.I am pretty sure now that it is a 4" stroker as the previous owner recalled.... he just didn't have receipts or much for records. Was built many years ago. But he is a trustworthy guy and the rest of the car is legit.
Unfortunately I think your results are in line with my previous comment. Decent for a 364 not so good for a 400+ with high end heads
Last edited by flash68; Dec 3, 2019 at 01:01 PM.
Have you done a leakdown or compression test in all cylinders? Confirmed what spark plugs are in it... and maybe change them out?
That torque seems low even for a 402ci motor. My LS7 427 with mild exhaust porting on the heads, stock LS7 intake, 1 7/8" long tubes, 11.25:1 compression, and older LS7 grind 243/256 .650" lift QM600 cam made 522rwhp/472rwtq on a Dynojet, T56, steel flywheel clutch/twin disc, 8.8" IRS out back. 3.73's with a 335/30/18 tire.











