Horsepower Research 468 solid roller Dynojet numbers
#1
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
Horsepower Research 468 solid roller Dynojet numbers
After our initial break in dyno pulls, where can we go from here ?
We are base lined at 691/580 SAE, but we've got a few intake manifolds to test, so stay tuned.....
We are base lined at 691/580 SAE, but we've got a few intake manifolds to test, so stay tuned.....
The following 4 users liked this post by fnbadaz06:
#3
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
My IAT circuit is faulty (showing -40) and during PE it's going super pig rich, causing that dip. We are awaiting a replacement harness assembly to fix the wiring, but during these runs we simply clear the DTC from the HP Tuner laptop.
#4
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
698 RWHP@7300 ....and climbing.
This is with our "test" Holley high ram setup.
Comparison between my 691 baseline pull and yesterday's 698.....you can see the fueling differences in that 5000 range when peak torque is roughly. We will concentrate on getting that adjusted and we will see what the results are. Additional intake goodies arrive today
We just might cross that magical 7xx SAE RWHP line this weekend !!!!!
This is with our "test" Holley high ram setup.
Comparison between my 691 baseline pull and yesterday's 698.....you can see the fueling differences in that 5000 range when peak torque is roughly. We will concentrate on getting that adjusted and we will see what the results are. Additional intake goodies arrive today
We just might cross that magical 7xx SAE RWHP line this weekend !!!!!
#5
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
Interesting comparisons.....
My 698 RWHP dyno with both of John's Monte Carlo LS7 dyno's overlayed onto it.
Look at the runtime conditions as well.
John's 694 was registered on his own dyno, which all of my runs have been made on.
John's 706 was registered on a dyno when the engine was fresh and the dyno was in the Pacific Northwest.
John B's LS7 powered Monte Carlo SS, 694 RWHP dyno pulls on his personal dyno versus Victor's HPR 468 C6 Z06 on John's dyno at 698 RWHP.
John B's LS7 powered Monte Carlo SS, 706 RWHP dyno pulls on Pacific Northwest based dyno versus Victor's HPR 468 C6 Z06 on John's dyno at 698 RWHP.
My 698 RWHP dyno with both of John's Monte Carlo LS7 dyno's overlayed onto it.
Look at the runtime conditions as well.
John's 694 was registered on his own dyno, which all of my runs have been made on.
John's 706 was registered on a dyno when the engine was fresh and the dyno was in the Pacific Northwest.
John B's LS7 powered Monte Carlo SS, 694 RWHP dyno pulls on his personal dyno versus Victor's HPR 468 C6 Z06 on John's dyno at 698 RWHP.
John B's LS7 powered Monte Carlo SS, 706 RWHP dyno pulls on Pacific Northwest based dyno versus Victor's HPR 468 C6 Z06 on John's dyno at 698 RWHP.
#6
TECH Regular
iTrader: (4)
Man this is an awesome thread, very interested to see what it does with different intake manifolds on. Any plans to use a msd or fast that would work with a factory hood? This is the biggest thing holding me back from taking the plunge into the big cube n/a world, i have about the same hood clearance as a c5/6 corvette in my little 3rd gen rx7. Ive been reading both your build threads and learning alot, keep it coming!
The following users liked this post:
DualQuadDave (01-09-2023)
#7
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
Man this is an awesome thread, very interested to see what it does with different intake manifolds on. Any plans to use a msd or fast that would work with a factory hood? This is the biggest thing holding me back from taking the plunge into the big cube n/a world, i have about the same hood clearance as a c5/6 corvette in my little 3rd gen rx7. Ive been reading both your build threads and learning alot, keep it coming!
We will try a CID intake with a Dominator 4550 to NW112 adapter plate as we know that will open things up a bit for guys who don't have hood limitations. This engine might find it's way into my 70 Chevelle which could use the CID with the Cowl Induction hood.
Trending Topics
The following 4 users liked this post by fnbadaz06:
#10
#11
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
703 RWHP and 573 Torque is where we ended up at..... and that number was reached with a 5" bell mouth installed instead of my 5" intake tube with a SD tune..
The tube is causing erratic MAF frequencys, probably because it's mounted too close to the throttle body blade.
I'll try my Halltech CF108 with the MAF forward design to see if that calms it back down.
The tube is causing erratic MAF frequencys, probably because it's mounted too close to the throttle body blade.
I'll try my Halltech CF108 with the MAF forward design to see if that calms it back down.
#12
Look at the torque. I hope the OP is embarrassed lol
great #s
great #s
#13
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
Uncorrected numbers....the true RWHP put down on the dyno, is 670/547 ay 98* and 3.6% humidity (really dry that day).
Do you think 670 RWHP and a race weight of 3200 lbs is good enough for 148 MPH trap ?
I don't think so, personally
.
Do you think 670 RWHP and a race weight of 3200 lbs is good enough for 148 MPH trap ?
I don't think so, personally
.
#15
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
Today, we put the bell mouth on the 112 TB and made some pulls......... 705 RWHP, 572 torque...SAE, with a 3.90 gear.(which cost approximately 2%)
Note how flat the power curve is up top with very minimal drop off at 7700 RPM where I'm still makiing 692 RWHP !!!!!
For those who prefer STD correction....717 RWHP
STD correction....
#17
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
#18
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
Went 143.45 at my first test and tune a month ago.
Cold ir is landing in Phoenix now, but our local drag strip has no drag racing action for the rest of the year
I'm going to have to travel to Tucson for a TnT on the 29th, but that track is up at 3000+ DA.
Dang it.
Cold ir is landing in Phoenix now, but our local drag strip has no drag racing action for the rest of the year
I'm going to have to travel to Tucson for a TnT on the 29th, but that track is up at 3000+ DA.
Dang it.
The following 2 users liked this post by fnbadaz06:
DualQuadDave (01-09-2023), LCBE (12-28-2022)
The following users liked this post:
jayyyw (01-19-2023)
#20
How much do they lose out before that?