Dyno, E85 results.
My car is a 383 with only 9.5:1 compression. Orginally built it for blower but I think I can get it in the 6"s in the 1/8 just on motor. That will be enough for me with this car. Car is auto with a 9' rear.
Last edited by 98LS1auto; Jun 23, 2022 at 08:34 PM.

I been gettin brow beatin a little bit in a FB group about going to E85 a lot of people repeating "E85 is not worth it" "E85 is worthless if you're n/a" "waste of money to go e85, you're just going to burn more gas"
But even if you add in the higher % of consumption you're still saving money running E85 vs regular gas with the way things are today and not to mention with the E85 it will keep your engine a little cleaner!
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I been gettin brow beatin a little bit in a FB group about going to E85 a lot of people repeating "E85 is not worth it" "E85 is worthless if you're n/a" "waste of money to go e85, you're just going to burn more gas"
But even if you add in the higher % of consumption you're still saving money running E85 vs regular gas with the way things are today and not to mention with the E85 it will keep your engine a little cleaner!
For example, by me comparing E85 & E10:
- Right now, it's less than 5%. I'll lose that in economy easily.
- Back in March, E85 was actually MORE expensive than E10. So even without counting fuel economy loss, it was still more expensive.
- A year ago June, E85 was 44% cheaper than E10 so it easily would've been a savings.
E85 does tend to make a little more down low and midrange torque, and great throttle response.
I like E85 for NA engines because it smells a lot better, zero concerns about detonation in any circumstance (even fully heat soaked 150* IAT's), and the charge cooling effect of the ethanol reducing IAT's as well as pulling more heat out of the cooling system. Running lower IAT and coolant temp means you'll get all the timing more of the time. Nothing worse than heat soaking and getting into that -8* range of the timing modifier table...except I guess pinging would be worse.
On higher compression engines it can of course take advantage of the 105 octane and make 20-30hp more.
Surprised to see this engine pickup through the powerband. Kind of curious if the pump gas tune was soft. I bet you could run this engine on 87 octane without knock.
I been gettin brow beatin a little bit in a FB group about going to E85 a lot of people repeating "E85 is not worth it" "E85 is worthless if you're n/a" "waste of money to go e85, you're just going to burn more gas"
But even if you add in the higher % of consumption you're still saving money running E85 vs regular gas with the way things are today and not to mention with the E85 it will keep your engine a little cleaner!
E85 does tend to make a little more down low and midrange torque, and great throttle response.
I like E85 for NA engines because it smells a lot better, zero concerns about detonation in any circumstance (even fully heat soaked 150* IAT's), and the charge cooling effect of the ethanol reducing IAT's as well as pulling more heat out of the cooling system. Running lower IAT and coolant temp means you'll get all the timing more of the time. Nothing worse than heat soaking and getting into that -8* range of the timing modifier table...except I guess pinging would be worse.
On higher compression engines it can of course take advantage of the 105 octane and make 20-30hp more.
Surprised to see this engine pickup through the powerband. Kind of curious if the pump gas tune was soft. I bet you could run this engine on 87 octane without knock.
I got e85 yesterday for 2.99 a gallon, premium was over 5 a gallon and I got 17 mpg on e85 in a LS1 with a cam, 4000 converter and 3:42 gears. I would have needed to get 29 mpg on premium to equal the savings from e85. I guarantee this car won’t come close to getting 29 mpg with premium in the tank.
Last edited by 03LQ9; Jul 12, 2022 at 02:07 PM.











