'99 M6 with boltons... low #'s?
11-17-2004, 10:11 AM
#41
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Kennedale TX
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by KB99WS6
you are saying lower than 00's AND 98's?? It seems to me 98-00's are all the same but the 01' & 02's dyno higher. Not sure what would make 99's less powerful. Is there anything unique to the engine/drivetrain in 1999?
I've only seen your car go 13.00's in the 1/4, must be a bad driver mod. 
11-17-2004, 11:02 AM
#42
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Long island, NY
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by bottlefed5.0
Don't act like you know anything about cars. I've only seen your car go 13.00's in the 1/4, must be a bad driver mod.
I've only seen your car go 13.00's in the 1/4, must be a bad driver mod. The only time I went 13.00 was when I was bone stock and slowed down to wave to all the pretty ladies in the audience yelling for me.
11-17-2004, 11:15 AM
#43
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Kennedale TX
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by KB99WS6
Who let the little 5.0 kid in here! You need another point7 before you can talk to me biatch! Till than you betta pump lotsa Naws to prevent a loss
The only time I went 13.00 was when I was bone stock and slowed down to wave to all the pretty ladies in the audience yelling for me.
The only time I went 13.00 was when I was bone stock and slowed down to wave to all the pretty ladies in the audience yelling for me.
Oh I'm sorry, I guess your car is going what,,, 12.90's now, with all those MAJOR bolt-on's.
11-17-2004, 12:11 PM
#44
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Long island, NY
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sure I could of easily and cheaply run to the bottle like SOME people, but I prefer Au Naturelle raw muscle. And I like taking my time w/my mods. Cam and heads will soon find their way into my big&beautiful 5.7 350. Whats that? Your's is only 302?? Aww...hey don't worry, size isn't everything...only the lovely ladies think so. Hello ladies! Dizam! Why me so sexay!
11-17-2004, 12:24 PM
#45
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Kennedale TX
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by KB99WS6
Sure I could of easily and cheaply run to the bottle like SOME people, but I prefer Au Naturelle raw muscle. And I like taking my time w/my mods. Cam and heads will soon find their way into my big&beautiful 5.7 350. Whats that? Your's is only 302?? Aww...hey don't worry, size isn't everything...only the lovely ladies think so. Hello ladies! Dizam! Why me so sexay!
Last edited by bottlefed5.0; 11-17-2004 at 12:33 PM.
11-17-2004, 12:43 PM
#46
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Long island, NY
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by bottlefed5.0
to bad you have no ******* idea what your talking about. ive spanked so many ls1's ive lost count. if you think your junky **** is so god damn fast lets put some money on a race when ever your ready. i dont think they make a nitrous kit big enough to help you
than a couple seconds later you'd be looking ahead through my back window and seeing this 
Than I'd be getting paid and go out for some fun
11-17-2004, 12:52 PM
#47
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Kennedale TX
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by KB99WS6
Aww, did I hurt the little guy's feelings? Why waste your time and money. Here, I'll just enact what would happen if we raced. I'd give you a head start & you'd look in your rear view and see this than a couple seconds later you'd be looking ahead through my back window and seeing this
Than I'd be getting paid and go out for some fun
than a couple seconds later you'd be looking ahead through my back window and seeing this Than I'd be getting paid and go out for some fun
, ok im done playing internet commando if you want to race call me later bitch
11-17-2004, 01:10 PM
#49
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by KB99WS6
NOBR8KSS,
I can't figure out your middle dyno numbers at all. Since you mentioned the MAF cleaning, was that the problem on the 2nd dyno?? Adding Headers, Y-pipe and bullets obviously should not make you lose 10rwhp and 15rwtq. Was this all the same dyno?? Either way those 2nd dyno numbers are insanely low for the mods.
I can't figure out your middle dyno numbers at all. Since you mentioned the MAF cleaning, was that the problem on the 2nd dyno?? Adding Headers, Y-pipe and bullets obviously should not make you lose 10rwhp and 15rwtq. Was this all the same dyno?? Either way those 2nd dyno numbers are insanely low for the mods.
The reason for the low dyno numbers was the crush bent 2.5" dual exhaust system. At the crush bends, the diameter of the exhaust shrunk to about 2" resulting in a major flow problem. Replacing it with the 2.5" mandrel bent dual exhaust from Lane's solved the problem.
I was trying to show that a mandrel bent 2.5" dual exhaust is far superior to a crush bent 2.5" dual exhaust....in my case it was superior by 32 rwhp. (308 to 340 rwhp by switching to mandrel bends)
My car dynoed 340 rwhp and 340 rwtq with Lane's duals, MAC headers, a lid, and stock PCM tuning. No other engine mods. I don't consider those to be low numbers at all.
Last edited by NOBR8KSS; 11-17-2004 at 01:21 PM.
04-05-2005, 08:58 PM
#53
Originally Posted by NOBR8KSS
For your consideration:
Stock with lid and loudmouth cat-back: 318 rwhp, 326 rwtq
Lid, MAC headers, 2.5" crush bent w/ x-pipe & Dynomax bullets: 308 rwhp, 311 rwtq
Lid, MAC headers, Lane's 2.5" mandrel bent duals w/ Dr. Gas x-pipe and 14" Magnaflow mufflers: 340 rwhp, 340 rwtq
PCM had stock tuning in all three cases.
Stock with lid and loudmouth cat-back: 318 rwhp, 326 rwtq
Lid, MAC headers, 2.5" crush bent w/ x-pipe & Dynomax bullets: 308 rwhp, 311 rwtq
Lid, MAC headers, Lane's 2.5" mandrel bent duals w/ Dr. Gas x-pipe and 14" Magnaflow mufflers: 340 rwhp, 340 rwtq
PCM had stock tuning in all three cases.
I am going to fix this and get it done RIGHT.
04-06-2005, 12:56 AM
#55
Teching In
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Apple Valley, Minnesota
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Those numbers seem to be good, allthough I put down 322 rwhp and 327 rwtq with my 99 Z through an A4, with only lid, hooker lts ory and everyones favorite exhaust, flowmaster, guess I have a factory freak or something....
04-06-2005, 01:10 PM
#56
11 Second Club
Apparently the production tolerances for these cars are pretty wide. A friend just dynoed his '00 with almost the same mods (he has the FAST 78 mm intake) and his SS put down 357 rwhp.
05-21-2005, 12:01 AM
#57
Originally Posted by NavySS
Oh no, it's back from the dead! 
Good luck on getting it done right
Good luck on getting it done right
That's what you get when you get it done right! Don't make the same mistake I did.
