T-rex LSX 90/90 setup!
03-31-2005, 06:31 PM
#1
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
T-rex LSX 90/90 setup! I was speaking with someone at Thunder the other day they wanted me to post this graph up, the car made 445 previous to the LSX 90/90 setup. they said no one ever beleives it when they do stuff like this..... hehe
03-31-2005, 07:04 PM
#2
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: San Ramon, ca
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This car is a beast. For a car that has never had the heads touched it makes some serious power. I have personally driven it and for the cam size and setup it drives quite nice. Most of this is due to the great tuning ability of nick, but it is amazing what we can get out of these cars! Just my .02!
-matt
-matt
).
03-31-2005, 09:36 PM
#7
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: North Texas
Posts: 8,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
can't wait to get my hands on a fast 90 and a nick williams tb. that combo just plain makes power on 23x+ sized cams. congrats....thats some serious hp!
Trending Topics
03-31-2005, 09:45 PM
#9
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: West Lafayette, IN
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Geez! This was on your 99 with 853 castings, correct? Either way, those are some sick numbers. 
I wish my T-ReX would do that.
Would you mind posting your complete mod list?
Josh
I wish my T-ReX would do that.Would you mind posting your complete mod list?
Josh
04-01-2005, 02:14 AM
#14
On The Tree
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Ramon, CA
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by nasty ss
This car is a beast. For a car that has never had the heads touched it makes some serious power. I have personally driven it and for the cam size and setup it drives quite nice. Most of this is due to the great tuning ability of nick, but it is amazing what we can get out of these cars! Just my .02!
-matt
-matt
Yea what he said I've driven the car too runs gooooooodddddd...
04-01-2005, 06:28 AM
#15
!LS1 11 Second Club
Originally Posted by Full-Force
1200 bucks for 10hp and 10ft/lb ... isthat right?
When you've maxed out your mods, 90/90 is the icing on the cake.
04-01-2005, 07:40 AM
#16
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Miramar, FL
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ditto what Carlos said. His tq band is about 900rpms strong when it's in the 400whp range. With the LSX setup his tq band is like 2200rpms long. That's a big difference when you are sitting in 3rd or 4th pulling through a gear. The power under the curve is looking very nice, and 450whp 500rpms sooner and 400whp by 5100-5200rpms is plain sick 
.
Congrats on the setup! I'll post results of mine once it all gets here. It's on backorder right now.
.Congrats on the setup! I'll post results of mine once it all gets here. It's on backorder right now.
04-01-2005, 03:01 PM
#18
TECH Junkie
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: At the office
Posts: 3,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SouthFL.02.SS
Yeah, but look how much sooner 400ft/lbs becomes available.
When you've maxed out your mods, 90/90 is the icing on the cake.
When you've maxed out your mods, 90/90 is the icing on the cake.
The first one is SAE corrected, and the second one is uncorrected.
I don't see any solid comparison able to be drawn from these results.
It sounded like he made 445rwhp (corrected I'm assuming) so he said before the 90/90 setup, and now he makes 453rwhp corrected. Sounds like an 8rwhp gain for over $1000.
Not good bang for your buck IMO.
04-01-2005, 10:41 PM
#19
10 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: HTOWN
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by verbs
The two dyno graphs posted are worthless.
The first one is SAE corrected, and the second one is uncorrected.
I don't see any solid comparison able to be drawn from these results.
It sounded like he made 445rwhp (corrected I'm assuming) so he said before the 90/90 setup, and now he makes 453rwhp corrected. Sounds like an 8rwhp gain for over $1000.
Not good bang for your buck IMO.
The first one is SAE corrected, and the second one is uncorrected.
I don't see any solid comparison able to be drawn from these results.
It sounded like he made 445rwhp (corrected I'm assuming) so he said before the 90/90 setup, and now he makes 453rwhp corrected. Sounds like an 8rwhp gain for over $1000.
Not good bang for your buck IMO.
Matt
04-02-2005, 02:08 AM
#20
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by NVR4GET
The 2 run name's are the same, so it is fake I think.
Matt
Matt
LMFAO!!! haha
the two run names are the same because they are the same, corrected and then uncorrected, they are not before and after dyno graphs, this is on a Z06 with FLP headers,CAI yadda yadda. the car previously made 443 rwhp SAE the LSX netted him about 10 rwhp. NO its not a good bang for the buck, but its just what it is and I was showing you people that, the uncorrected graph was because I was impressed with the weather conditions that it actualy made that much power.
this graph was just posted to show that a Trex cam does make great power.