Dyno #'s for Crane Gold Race Rocker Arms
#1
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Houston/Lubbock
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dyno #'s for Crane Gold Race Rocker Arms
Has anyone installed Crane Cams LS1 Gold Race Rocker Arms w/ quick lift technology? Their webiste says that they are good for 20 horsepower, I just wanted some outside verification. Thanks
#3
11 Second Club
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NE PA
Posts: 1,320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Schwindj
Has anyone installed Crane Cams LS1 Gold Race Rocker Arms w/ quick lift technology? Their webiste says that they are good for 20 horsepower, I just wanted some outside verification. Thanks
With the above in mind, if you replaced a set of the stock 1.70 rockers (actually 1.69) with a set of the Crane 1.70 rockers (actually 1.72), I think you could reasonably expect to see a gain of 15-20 rwhp.
#6
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
Originally Posted by XTrooper
With the above in mind, if you replaced a set of the stock 1.70 rockers (actually 1.69) with a set of the Crane 1.70 rockers (actually 1.72), I think you could reasonably expect to see a gain of 15-20 rwhp.
#7
11 Second Club
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NE PA
Posts: 1,320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JimMueller
So what if you switched from stock to the 1.8[9]'s?
Trending Topics
#9
Those are unique gains. I'd be interested to see if lobe profile has an effect on the top end numbers, and where the numbers are effected, since there are no results other than one or two, however positive so far. Are there any independent graphs?
#10
10 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: orlando, fl
Posts: 4,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well, i don't work for vinci or crane. so i guess i'm independant?? here's the dyno from the wife's car when swapping from stock rockers to vinci/crane 1.8 accelerated lift rockers on stock cam. also added the vinci/crane dual springs at the same time.
dyno 9 before
dyno 11 500 miles
dyno 14 10 months later
dyno 9 before
dyno 11 500 miles
dyno 14 10 months later
#11
10 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
Originally Posted by mrr23
well, i don't work for vinci or crane. so i guess i'm independant?? here's the dyno from the wife's car when swapping from stock rockers to vinci/crane 1.8 accelerated lift rockers on stock cam. also added the vinci/crane dual springs at the same time.
dyno 9 before
dyno 11 500 miles
dyno 14 10 months later
dyno 9 before
dyno 11 500 miles
dyno 14 10 months later
#14
Originally Posted by 02SOMWS6
I'm running stock rockers with a split duration cam .(lift is 581/588) I have double valve springs already. Is my lift gonna be to high with the crane rockers? I've been thinking about the jessel set up but the crane is looking like the cheaper way togo so there's more money for other things
#16
10 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: orlando, fl
Posts: 4,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JakeFusion
.581/.588 sounds like 224/228 XE-R? If it's XE-R, I wouldn't touch a 1.8 rocker, because the ramp rate is insane on that lobe. That = bad combination.
why's that?? we've been discussing this very same theory here: https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...ghlight=rocker
is it because of piston to valve clearance issue? valve springs recommended for that cam not be able to withstand the increased speed of the valve now?
#17
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
one of the guys at vinci is running the 049 cam with .600/.600 lift witht he 1.8 accell rcokers, so his max lift is ~.643/.643. this is a head cam stroker car, but the cam is one of cranes accellerated lift models, but i hear this is a less agressive lobe compared to an xer lobe. the motor/pistons will clear the lift, but the pretty aggressive cam works with the 1.8 (1.82max) rockers...
#19
Banned
iTrader: (45)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 2,556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ls1mojo
You are dangerously close to too steep lift with 1.8s. I would run 1.7s with that cam 581 lift is already quite bit on a hydraulic valvetrain.
Only time will tell, ok, the fact of whether a spring can hold onto that themselves is another issue all together. The fact remains, the original numbers would be increased because the extra rate increases the aggressiveness of the lobe thereby increasing the apparent size of the cam because of these rockers.
#20
11 Second Club
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NE PA
Posts: 1,320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JakeFusion
.581/.588 sounds like 224/228 XE-R? If it's XE-R, I wouldn't touch a 1.8 rocker, because the ramp rate is insane on that lobe. That = bad combination.