Gordon0652

iTrader: (4)

I do not believe...
I want to see a Dyno Sheet. It prob was a peak on the graph dew to a miss read...

Intercooler2

iTrader: (24)

Good numbers!


Is that Dynojet? Long ago mine made 353 RWHP on a Mustang Dyno. So corrected to a Dynojet was roughly 377 RWHP. The car has a better tune now... was running 12.1 back then through a 10 bolt @ 112 MPH. It now goes 11.80@114.36 through a 9". So the 9" eats 15 HP but it looks like I gained 25 RWHP or more since the 12.1. My sled at 3750 lb race weight has to be darn near 380 RWHP.

Run it at the track and post up the numbers. Would be interesting to see

JeaneZ28

iTrader: (3)

Way to bump an old thread. I could see a newb doing this but you guys.

Intercooler2

iTrader: (24)

I didn't see the date but... he never gave a graph so we can file this one in the BS file

SlowFRC

iTrader: (2)

Never gave a graph or track numbers so this thread is irrelevant. If the car didn't trap 115 atleast then the numbers are bs.

I would give someone crap for bumping a 4 year old thread but by making this post I'm bumping a 4 year old thread too. I guess I'll just shut up and leave now so this thread can die.

John02SS

iTrader: (47)

This car was wrapped around a pole shortly after this. Mike is a buddy of mine, and is a ol' married fart now. Haven't messed with cars since.

venom ws7

iTrader: (13)

John any video, pics or numbers from your cars???

Speeds8erM-1

iTrader: (28)

Car didnt make that number, ended up being an incorrect dyno file at the time. Revision from Dynojet a week later said it would have been 351 rwhp.

zstripper2k

Ill post my new numbers as soon as I get tuned. Dynoed 349rwhp untuned with a ported MAF that was making the car run major fat. Have stock MAF back in and car is night and day difference. Dyno tune here we come!!