Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

dyno'd today

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 22, 2005 | 08:15 PM
  #1  
pdd's Avatar
pdd
Thread Starter
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,156
Likes: 0
From: dudley mass
Default dyno'd today

cant seem to upload the graph.
i made 441 rwhp and 408rwtq through 4.10s and cats. i was hopin for more now if i can get to the track and not break
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2005 | 08:26 PM
  #2  
jrp's Avatar
jrp
SN95 Director
20 Year Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 10,755
Likes: 7
From: Valencia, Ca
Default

email me the graph at .....

i've been waiting for your results . your drivetrain, tires, and other variables are the same correct? you just changed heads, cam, compression ?

and its been a while, refresh me on your old combo; PP ls6 style heads, cam? and dyno numbers; 427rwhp?

Last edited by jrp; Jun 23, 2005 at 07:50 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2005 | 08:27 PM
  #3  
Mirek's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
From: Berkley, MI
Default

Damn that is plenty of HP through 4:10's and I bet the curve looks good and it's not just a peak HP set-up either.
Nice to finally see the number. What were the numbers on your old Patriot H/C & then the prior AFR H/C ?

Best of luck on not busting your car bro.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 06:31 AM
  #4  
Hardtop's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,706
Likes: 0
From: LaPlata, Md.
Default

That's real nice through the cats with 4.10's. Congrats.

Bruce
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 09:33 AM
  #5  
Ben01C5's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
From: Seoul, Korea
Default

Nice numbers. I have been waiting to see yours for a while now as well.

Good luck at the track.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 10:01 AM
  #6  
777's Avatar
777
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,697
Likes: 2
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default

I'm suprised you aren't over 450rwhp.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 10:11 AM
  #7  
LS1 BU's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
From: South Elgin
Default

I'd like to see the graph. I bet it has an awesome torque curve.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 10:31 AM
  #8  
SideStep's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,946
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by jrp
... your drivetrain, tires, and other variables are the same correct? you just changed heads, cam, compression ?

and its been a while, refresh me on your old combo; PP ls6 style heads, cam? and dyno numbers; 427rwhp?
What did you change I can not remember what u had on your last dyno????





Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 11:43 AM
  #9  
pdd's Avatar
pdd
Thread Starter
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,156
Likes: 0
From: dudley mass
Default

Originally Posted by jrp
email me the graph at khadafi3@juno.com.

i've been waiting for your results . your drivetrain, tires, and other variables are the same correct? you just changed heads, cam, compression ?

and its been a while, refresh me on your old combo; PP ls6 style heads, cam? and dyno numbers; 427rwhp?
i sent the graph.
old combo was afr 205's unmilled, fm11, aluminum flywheel and 3.90's=435rwhp

new combo- afr's with tea 2.5 program milled .024, .045cometics, .037 quench, fm14, billet flywheel and 4.10's-other variables the same=441rwhp
definatly wanted atleast 450rwhp for all the work i did
so if i new what i new now, i wouldnt have touched a thing
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 12:26 PM
  #10  
distortion_69's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,988
Likes: 0
From: Jonesboro, Ga
Default

Your going to lose a few with the aluminum flywheel being gone, but its worth it.

Josh
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 01:21 PM
  #11  
JakeFusion's Avatar
Super Hulk Smash
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,258
Likes: 146
From: Pace, FL
Default

pdd, what ICL is the F14 on? If it's not 112, make it. Hell, try 114 or 115 while you're at it. That thing should be around 460 even with the cats.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 02:25 PM
  #12  
jrp's Avatar
jrp
SN95 Director
20 Year Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 10,755
Likes: 7
From: Valencia, Ca
Default



tq curve is dissapointing....
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 02:44 PM
  #13  
P Mack's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 2
From: Phoenix
Default

Damn, I remember when you posted your first results and everyone told you that you should mill the heads and get the quench right, etc, and you'd get over 450. Must be frustrating. Although 441/408 is still way better than average.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 02:49 PM
  #14  
BrentB@TEA's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
From: Chattanooga
Default

air fuel curve is all over the place from what I can see. Are you tuning it yourself? 12:1 @ 4000 is costing you some torque for sure.
I would expect your combination to make more power also. Unless the exhaust with the cats is a big restriction. I also notice it is fattening up at the top of the run. (COT maybe) I am sure this is going to cost a few HP. Where is your timing set at?
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 03:10 PM
  #15  
SideStep's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,946
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by BrentB@TEA
air fuel curve is all over the place from what I can see. Are you tuning it yourself? 12:1 @ 4000 is costing you some torque for sure.
I would expect your combination to make more power also. Unless the exhaust with the cats is a big restriction. I also notice it is fattening up at the top of the run. (COT maybe) I am sure this is going to cost a few HP. Where is your timing set at?

Are you running the cats in the LGs??? I am but I cannot remember if you are???

Last edited by SideStep; Jun 23, 2005 at 03:34 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 03:37 PM
  #16  
JakeFusion's Avatar
Super Hulk Smash
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,258
Likes: 146
From: Pace, FL
Default

Lean it out and retard the cam... If it's a stock F14, it's what 112+4? And yes, he said cats. But they should only be costing him 5-10rwhp. He should be up around 480 like all the other 230+ duration AFR headed cars with the LG headers and FAST intake, so 10rwhp won't get him there...
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 03:37 PM
  #17  
Got Me SOM's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,368
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, Florida
Default

i'd be pissed if I did all that and only gained 6 hp.. Should of added spray or something and got a real nice increase!
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 03:48 PM
  #18  
Mirek's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
From: Berkley, MI
Default

I would probably be expecting some "Mamo numbers" after all that myself. It is still impressive. What is the deal with that torque curve anyway and why does the HP drop off so quick with a cam like that? I wonder if having TEA do the heads could have hurt anything (Just wondering). Geez oww and with the milling and all.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 04:07 PM
  #19  
pdd's Avatar
pdd
Thread Starter
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,156
Likes: 0
From: dudley mass
Default

slowhawk did my tuning. yes im fustrated with all the time and effort into the car. the cam is a 112lsa+4. was expecting at least 450rwhp. i dont get that torque curve either. don says somethings holding this car back. he adjusting the timing 6 degrees and nothing changed on the graph. feels like somethings holding the car back to. it doesnt take off till 4 grand
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 04:38 PM
  #20  
Tony Mamo @ AFR's Avatar
Flow Wizard
20 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,197
Likes: 5
Default

I would be curious to see your previous gragh with the unmilled 205's out of the box and your previous cam. Don has tuned alot of AFR headed cars with some pretty impressive results. I assume he is the same tuner that handled it originally? Also, you might want to go over basics just to rule them out (leakdown, cranking compression, lifter preload, etc.).

Good luck...
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:11 AM.