RWHP & RWTQ of N/A bolt-on only cars (no cam or heads)
07-20-2005, 09:26 PM
#21
Administrator
Originally Posted by BAIN
No way in hell. Those #'s on a dynojet would be around 380 or so. 
07-21-2005, 06:29 AM
#22
Originally Posted by unit213
That is not necessarily true. My buddy has a Mustang dyno and a dynojet. The numbers are damned near the same. Of course not all results are like that.
People have that misconception though, I myself have been to a few mustang dynos and the #'s have been exaggerated. That's why people sometimes refer to them as "dial a HP" dynos.
07-21-2005, 07:46 PM
#24
TECH Addict
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by unit213
That is not necessarily true. My buddy has a Mustang dyno and a dynojet. The numbers are damned near the same. Of course not all results are like that.
When I had it dynoed last time it showed an increase of 22.3 RWHP and 9.2 RWTQ and the only differences were different Cats and a slightly different tune. It had me puzzled as well since they were both SAE corrected and on Mustang Dynos (different shops but still) and I did not think Mac cats would have hurt my #s so much.
I posted a thread awhile ago and got a good answer there:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/349226-dyno-new-s.html
I will have it back at the same shop to remove the Cats and have a Y pipe fabricated that will hug the underbody better and I am anxious to see the results after that.
07-25-2005, 02:34 PM
#26
Bolt on 2000 Z28 A4: 336rwhp/335rwtq
Subjective or not there has to be some point where one just says "yes, this is or is not" and the universally accepted answer is that if oil touches it it is NOT a bolt on...personally I do agree with that. 
Originally Posted by mrr23
i only pay attention to things said 1 million and ten times. is a tune considered a bolt on? after all there's no bolts to turn. so, everything is subjective. rockers are an easy add on.
the rockers are held on with bolts aren't they??? well at least studs and nuts.
the rockers are held on with bolts aren't they??? well at least studs and nuts.
07-25-2005, 08:03 PM
#27
12 Second Club
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Mpls, Minnesota
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 2001stripper
Those are very impressive numbers but they seem a little high for the times that you are running. Your car may be much heavier than mine though. My Z has run 12.43 @ 114 with 346/364 numbers. Is your 1/4 time in your sig with your current dyno numbers?
