67Ranger

iTrader: (16)

Thank you very much... and for mr. JRP, i agree with you that it isnt as accurate as the other programs, but it should give a decent idea of what a new motor should do... Especially if you dont have all those other files to work with.

bww3588

iTrader: (49)

679 hp at 7500 RPM
597 tq @5000 RPM
9.72@137.5 mph. on drag radials.

bww3588

iTrader: (49)

463 hp @ 6500 RPM w/o/N20
423 tq @ 5000 RPM w/o/N20
666 hp @ 6500 RPM w/N20
777 tq @ 2000 RPM w/N20

11.389 @ 120.8 w/o/N20
9.648 @ 137.3 MPH w/N20

bww3588

iTrader: (49)

387 hp @ 6000 RPM
379 tq @ 5000 RPM
11.824 @116.6 MPH with a stick
11.885 @ 111.8 MPH with auto w/5000 Stall

id say by these results and the results in your sig that this is pretty accurate.

jrp

iTrader: (16)

your kidding right. according to his sig he's trapped a best of 120mph. thats a 4 mph and 9 mph difference from what you stated with respective transmissions.

DD, dynosim and the other 30-50 buck programs are fun to dick around with, however as state there accuracy leaves much to be desired.

Dame should be well within the 500rwhp mark with his setup. did DD factor in the 11* heads vs the 15* stock, the high velocity merge collectors and primary length, ported intake. didnt think so. all of those have proven dyno and track gains in the real world over there "standard" counter parts. use DD to visual power curves when changing different centerlines on cams, came timing, compression, ect.

bww3588

iTrader: (49)

no they didnt, but whos gonna bitch for 50 bucks? if i want 100 percent accurate results im not gonna spend hundreds of dollars on another computer program. ill take the car to the dyno or the track. the purpose of a computer dyno sim is to get ballpark figures. a chassis dyno or engine dyno is for 100 percent accurate results. its quite obvious you dont like dyno sim/drag sim but obviously no one cares including me. so take your bitching elsewhere.

Forced370GTO

thankyou for taking the time to run that for me. if you dont mind, what would my setup make at 10 and 12 psi?
Originally Posted by Forced370GTO
370ci iron 4.030 bore x 3.622 stroke
patriot stage 2 heads 300cfm intake 230cfm exhaust
230/236 .603 lift 115LSA
3 in dual exhaust, no cats and LT headers.
stock intake and t-body
d1sc intercooled procharger at 16psi
9.66 c/r, 3.91 gears in the rear
04 gto @ 3700lbs 6speed

bww3588

iTrader: (49)

10 PSI:
676 hp @ 7500 RPM
595 tq @ 5000 RPM
9.743 @ 137.3 MPH
12 PSI:
677 hp @ 7500 RPM
596 tq @ 5000 RPM
9.736 @ 137.4 MPH

Forced370GTO

thankyou!!

bww3588

iTrader: (49)

alright guys due to some people (jrp) bitching that this software that i have is shitty for real world performance, take the results with a grain of salt. they are ball park not 100 percent. i appologize for not having a chassis dyno and engine dyno stashed away in my bathroom and closets of my house or 300 dollar 2 million megabyte software programs.

bww3588

iTrader: (49)

no problem sir.

dame

iTrader: (3)

bww3588:
Thank you for your time.......I was a little curious as to see what that program spit out... but I can assure you if my car dynos 1 rwhp under 500 there's gonna be hell to pay. LOL

I mean considering there are stock cubed h/c cars that do 465 with smaller cams..... I'd like to think my goals aren't to far fetched

Thanks again

Damian

bww3588

iTrader: (49)

yeah its not the most involved program but it ball parks it. i mean you cant look at a pile of parts and tell what kind of hp they are gonna make. these are flywheel numbers not rear wheel numbers. so factor accordingly. again i did this for ballpark figures for people on here not exact figures.

ohh good luck at the dyno.

BlueSix

There's where you program is terribly flawed. There's only a 3 hp difference between 16 psi and 10 psi.

bww3588

iTrader: (49)

i know its not perfect. but its a start. i mean could you have looked at a pile of parts and specs and figured out that its gonna make that power? i doubt it. the only way you could have is if you have read proven hp gains of each part. which require a dyno.

jrp

iTrader: (16)

not to mention he doesnt have the cfm; head, intake, and TB for a 7500 rpm hp peak.

bww3588 - i dont dislike the program; i havee DD2k, Dynosim, and engine analyser. the programs are nice for comparing power curves within a given application by changing a variable or two. however as a whole the accuracy for the stated hp numbers are largely a shot in the dark. genIII stuff is especially inaccurate.

the problem with DD is assuming the programers are using the correct dimensions and specs. Download Engine analyser (search google, should be able to find the free demo) and you'll see that its worlds ahead of DD. however you'll need alot more info to input. and with anything; garbage in equals garbage out.

bww3588

iTrader: (49)

true. weve covered that it is not an accurate program but most people on here are not going to pay for a 100 percent accurate dyno program when they can take the money and put it toward a dyno tune. or somthing like that.

RaNsOm

iTrader: (2)

ummm I dont think so 4mph=40hp, thats a lot. Id say Im pushin at least 400 to the wheels, thats at least 460bhp.

Gear ratio's dont matter to me because I was trapping 119 even with the 3.42's before my 4.33's