Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

do you believe that? 316rwhp/298rwtq what is wrong?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-14-2006, 03:24 PM
  #21  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Abdullah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 1,455
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

btw, still didn't get the chance to post my 2000 LS1 camaro dyno graph because i have a problem with the scanner's driver. hope tommorow i can fix the problem.
Old 03-15-2006, 12:11 PM
  #22  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Abdullah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 1,455
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

i scanned the dyno of my 2000 LS1 camaro. mods are in the sig. :

http://community.webshots.com/myphot...ecurity=ljoALm

how much rwhp/rwtq i would gain with tunning?

thanks
Old 03-25-2006, 07:26 AM
  #23  
Teching In
 
maxxxboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

hey abdullah i am guessing u need more ignition timing, u might also want to try richning that to about 12.8 or so, according to trials some cars like to be leaner and others like to be a lil' richer. try advancing the cam the cam seems to be a lil big for that compression
Old 03-25-2006, 09:50 AM
  #24  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Abdullah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 1,455
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by maxxxboost
hey abdullah i am guessing u need more ignition timing, u might also want to try richning that to about 12.8 or so, according to trials some cars like to be leaner and others like to be a lil' richer. try advancing the cam the cam seems to be a lil big for that compression

thanks for the reply maxxxboost but my friend just sold his car (grin).

now it is time for my 2000 LS1 camaro (grin).
Old 03-26-2006, 10:00 AM
  #25  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
 
Houston999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by maxxxboost
hey abdullah i am guessing u need more ignition timing, u might also want to try richning that to about 12.8 or so, according to trials some cars like to be leaner and others like to be a lil' richer. try advancing the cam the cam seems to be a lil big for that compression
I guess you can do that easily without worrying about detonation in the ls1 .However with the lt1 , it will be riskier to lean and advancing the spark and that might cuz engine failure very soon.speacially in k8 at the start of summer ...you know wam sayn Abdullah
Old 03-26-2006, 01:25 PM
  #26  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Abdullah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 1,455
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

thanks for the info Houston999.

i just installed Koni SA shocks and ES hyperflex bushings kit in my 2000 LS1 camaro and truely the car is handling now much better than before i'm happy for that. my next mod will be Griffin radiator ( or UMI upper and lower front A-arms and adjustable torque arm).
Old 03-28-2006, 04:13 PM
  #27  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (14)
 
RealQuick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: MA
Posts: 3,970
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

First off, some of you ls1 guys make me laugh. You really have some low opinions/knowledge of LT1s.

You have those spiks up top because your too lean. Richen it up some.

I made peak hp @ 12.5:1 A/F and actually lost a tiny bit of hp and gaied some torque by going to 12.8:1 A/F. My setup was 3.5 yr old LE heads and 230/236 .544/.556 114lsa cam:

Here is the dynocharts fom the same day:





Old 04-21-2006, 09:51 AM
  #28  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
 
OffspringZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

wow, thats not good at all. my stock headed XE 224/230 camd car with full bolt ons (X-pipe, longtubes, intake) and a PCMforless tune put down 342 wheel horsepower.




and a lot of you ls1 guys in this thread know **** about lt1s LOL
Old 04-21-2006, 12:09 PM
  #29  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Wicked_Hugger99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: enterprise, AL
Posts: 2,227
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Abdullah
i scanned the dyno of my 2000 LS1 camaro. mods are in the sig. :

http://community.webshots.com/myphot...ecurity=ljoALm

how much rwhp/rwtq i would gain with tunning?

thanks
Have you not used the LS1edit in ur sig for tuning?? I'd say about 10-12rwhp easy & 5-7rwtq. I picked up nearly 17rwhp & 7rwtq from just a dyno tune in my old full bolt-on 99Z A4 running 1 3/4 mac mids and 3in x-pipe with bullets & TDs through stock 10-bolt and 3.42s.
- As for the LT1 car, yea ur down on power big time. My old 95 Z 6sp made around 295rwhp with BBK 1 5/8in shorties, 2.5in ory, slp LM, FIPK, spec2 clutch w/ aluminum flywheel, and other usual stuff except ported TB & ud pulley . Had stock heads/cam and a .030 overbore. Then on a 75 dry shot it made 372rwhp. These runs were made on the same day using a portable chassis dyno which i know can be a little optimistic sometimes but you get the idea. On motor it went 13.1@108mph w/ a 2.1 60ft(sucks bad, I know) on 275/60 15in bfg DRs with my friend driving it(same guy i bought it from)




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:57 PM.