Torquer 2, cam only, speed density #'s
03-27-2006, 05:21 PM
#23
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by s346k
that's mild to me, i will be installing a "large" cam..238/246 110+0 lsa 
so SD tuning is easier, but really has no gains in terms of true hp increase?
so SD tuning is easier, but really has no gains in terms of true hp increase?
03-27-2006, 07:33 PM
#25
FormerVendor
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Lubbock
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jow02327
they dont have any on the 112 either 
03-27-2006, 09:37 PM
#26
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Manteca, CA
Posts: 1,212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by WS6 Kid
I just got my car sd tuned and the numbers it made were 430hp and 409 lb ft of torque.
My car is cam only and I dont have true duals OR a FAST manifold. I think these are pretty good numbers. Does anyone have other numbers like this with the Torquer 2 cam? I was surprised...
I have the graph and will get it up soon.
My car is cam only and I dont have true duals OR a FAST manifold. I think these are pretty good numbers. Does anyone have other numbers like this with the Torquer 2 cam? I was surprised...
I have the graph and will get it up soon.
We are running an MTI X1 (230/227 .591/.571 112LSA) and with SD tuning on Rick's (Synergy) Dynapak with the new software (reads like a Mustang Dyno) we put down 385.3 rwhp/386.1 rwtq through a 3400 stall TC (A4).
I also was curious, our MAF is still in place as a spacer, did you replace it with anything to open up the flow? I was thinking Fernco from Home Depot as a spacer with the regular air elbo to absorb the engine rotation to keep from breaking our lid... *shrug*
03-28-2006, 02:24 AM
#28
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Azrael
Holy cow! Was that on a Dynojet, and who did your tuning?
We are running an MTI X1 (230/227 .591/.571 112LSA) and with SD tuning on Rick's (Synergy) Dynapak with the new software (reads like a Mustang Dyno) we put down 385.3 rwhp/386.1 rwtq through a 3400 stall TC (A4).
I also was curious, our MAF is still in place as a spacer, did you replace it with anything to open up the flow? I was thinking Fernco from Home Depot as a spacer with the regular air elbo to absorb the engine rotation to keep from breaking our lid... *shrug*
We are running an MTI X1 (230/227 .591/.571 112LSA) and with SD tuning on Rick's (Synergy) Dynapak with the new software (reads like a Mustang Dyno) we put down 385.3 rwhp/386.1 rwtq through a 3400 stall TC (A4).
I also was curious, our MAF is still in place as a spacer, did you replace it with anything to open up the flow? I was thinking Fernco from Home Depot as a spacer with the regular air elbo to absorb the engine rotation to keep from breaking our lid... *shrug*
I am waiting for Charlie to email me the run files and then i will get the graph up.
03-28-2006, 05:21 AM
#30
I don't believe it for one bit. There are people with AFR heads with a tad smaller cam and barely make those numbers.
SD tuning doesn't make a magical 20 more RWHP over MAF tuning especially with everything else being the same.
Were you using race gas and 30-32 degrees timing?
SD tuning doesn't make a magical 20 more RWHP over MAF tuning especially with everything else being the same.
Were you using race gas and 30-32 degrees timing?
03-28-2006, 08:51 AM
#33
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Billiumss
I don't believe it for one bit. There are people with AFR heads with a tad smaller cam and barely make those numbers.
SD tuning doesn't make a magical 20 more RWHP over MAF tuning especially with everything else being the same.
Were you using race gas and 30-32 degrees timing?
SD tuning doesn't make a magical 20 more RWHP over MAF tuning especially with everything else being the same.
Were you using race gas and 30-32 degrees timing?
FYI: With the previous MAF tune the car made 414/385, so, YES, SD tuning DID add a magical 20 hp....
03-28-2006, 09:06 AM
#34
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Lubbock, Texas
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 954RR
Man I should have left my stock heads on then instead of getting the PRC LS6 heads from texas speed because I couldn't achieve those numbers (415/387).... even through a cutout. 
Anyone want to trade some TSP PRC LS6 heads milled down .17 for some stockers?
I have full boltons with the exception of an underdrive pulley.
Anyone want to trade some TSP PRC LS6 heads milled down .17 for some stockers?
I have full boltons with the exception of an underdrive pulley.
WS6 Kid- Nice numbers with the Torquer. Enjoy the setup!
Brian
__________________
01 NBM Z28- A4 w/3.23s, TSP Black Lid, Hooker Catback, Pacesetter Headers w/ORY, ASP Pulley, Ported Throttle Body, TSP Torq. v3(231/234) Camshaft, TCI 4400, PRC Stg 1 Heads
Texas Speed & Performance
www.texas-speed.com
(806) 866-0734
01 NBM Z28- A4 w/3.23s, TSP Black Lid, Hooker Catback, Pacesetter Headers w/ORY, ASP Pulley, Ported Throttle Body, TSP Torq. v3(231/234) Camshaft, TCI 4400, PRC Stg 1 Heads
Texas Speed & Performance
www.texas-speed.com
(806) 866-0734
03-28-2006, 09:38 AM
#36
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by offaxis
Screw the numbers that one hell of a nice looking car ya got there!
BTW congrats on the numbers!
BTW congrats on the numbers!
03-28-2006, 11:03 AM
#37
12 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NC, Charlotte / SC, RockHill
Posts: 1,191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
looks like those 228/234 range cams lately r putting the best #`s , its all about the right combo and the right tune .
"Bigger is better"
Thats not always true.
Awesome numbers man , what timing was your car pulling?
Congrats.
"Bigger is better"
Thats not always true.
Awesome numbers man , what timing was your car pulling?
Congrats.
03-28-2006, 02:44 PM
#39
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SideStep
Can you post a dyno-graph? (before and after???) SAE corrected right???
03-28-2006, 05:25 PM
#40
TECH Resident
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NC - Charlotte area
Posts: 3,747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
its all in how you tune...and it somewhat matters what you have bought and put into the car to get the power. some things work...and others don't
awesome numbers man! hopefully when I get a cam I will be up in the 400 range
awesome numbers man! hopefully when I get a cam I will be up in the 400 range