Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

LME 408/ET 245cc head results....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-07-2006, 09:45 PM
  #41  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
408WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kumar75150
Honestly, this makes me want to hold of on purchasing ETs for now. I know you will probably pick up more power but I thought 550 would be a breeze with a big cam.

Either way 530-540 is gonna run its *** off. Im anxious to see what mine will make with LS6 heads and the new cam.

Well, exactly. I mean...I know ET makes some of the best heads in the business, but those heads are a bit much for the street IMO. Probably damn good strip heads though. I never caught what intake it was? LS6 or FAST 90/90? If its LS6 that may be your problem. Those heads need at least a FAST intake. Those are great numbers anyway...
Old 04-07-2006, 10:00 PM
  #42  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
Ryne @ CMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: murrieta
Posts: 2,774
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 408WS6
Well, exactly. I mean...I know ET makes some of the best heads in the business, but those heads are a bit much for the street IMO. Probably damn good strip heads though. I never caught what intake it was? LS6 or FAST 90/90? If its LS6 that may be your problem. Those heads need at least a FAST intake. Those are great numbers anyway...
he is running a fast
Old 04-07-2006, 10:37 PM
  #43  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
gtodoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Miramar, FL
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

correct Fast/90 ported by Tony Mamo. NW 90mm tb.

dougie
Old 04-07-2006, 10:37 PM
  #44  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (37)
 
ls1408cp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

my setup is very much like dougs except I will have a ported victor jr with a accufab 4150 tb and the biggest kook headers i could get. i cant wait. thanks for the pm the other day doug
Old 04-07-2006, 11:14 PM
  #45  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (14)
 
ArcticZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 5,125
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Numbers look pretty low, could def run some more timing. My 408 with stock 317's/LS6/ported TB is giving me 410 ft/lb of tq at 2800 rpm, 445 peak at 5200. Looks like you've got a lot left in that once you get timing and exhaust sorted out.
Old 04-09-2006, 12:34 AM
  #46  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
gtodoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Miramar, FL
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Arctic, thanks for the advice. As soon as I get the exhaust/timing issue sorted out I'll post back some results. Keep in mind, I'm just a homegrown tuner. No expert here, so that may be part of the issue as well. No fair to compare mine to yours though, two different setups, you may have me beat at 2800, but I got you beat by 100wtq at 6000rpms And like my setup, I know your's isn't finished either.
Old 04-09-2006, 01:48 AM
  #47  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (14)
 
ArcticZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 5,125
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by gtodoug
No fair to compare mine to yours though, two different setups, you may have me beat at 2800, but I got you beat by 100wtq at 6000rpms And like my setup, I know your's isn't finished either.
Of course, it was just to show that if I can make x with this horribly restrictive setup then you can obviously make x^2.
Old 04-09-2006, 08:37 AM
  #48  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
gtodoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Miramar, FL
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

You just pointed out something very intresting . I never stopped to look at how aggessive my burst KR table is. As I'm looking over my HPT Scanner log the Burst knock table is too aggressive. I remember increasing it alot just to be safe and never really looked at it again after that.

Burst Knock: A table setup to pull timing upon rapid throttle transitions to avoid knock retard. You can control how aggressive or non existant you want this.

I could kiss you right now Arctic. Take a look below:

The combination of running 12:1 a/f ratio and 7.5* of timing = now power down low. Now I know I can work on another area. The table now is setup to aggessively pull timing from 2400 and not retain full timing until 3200rpms. At 3200 I'm still at 12.2:1 a/f so cleaning up the timing and a/f should make for some intresting results.

Arctic, I wasn't trying to get in a pissing match or anything, just trying to be funny but then started looking at why the tq difference was so great. Well, back to the drawing board!
Old 04-09-2006, 09:43 AM
  #49  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
383ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kansas City, KS
Posts: 2,893
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

its not pulling any knock timing though.
Old 04-09-2006, 10:27 AM
  #50  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
gtodoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Miramar, FL
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

No, I never said KR, I stated burst KR
Old 04-09-2006, 11:03 AM
  #51  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
 
Sport Side's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gtodoug
No, I never said KR, I stated burst KR
I don't think you are seeing the affects of burst KR but instead just lack of timing in those cells.
Pull up your histogram and see what your timing is at:
2000RPM - 50% TPS
2500RPM - 75% TPS
2500RPM - 100% TPS
exc.
Bump those up.

BTW. I'm confused on this.
Your current cam was designed around another setup or the one you are currently using? You were mentioning different heads and 2.5'' exhaust and I got kinda mixed up on this.
If so, have Ed do you up another cam down the road.

How are the track times? Didn't you run it already? Seem to be in the ball park or are you slow at the track too?
Old 04-09-2006, 11:12 AM
  #52  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (14)
 
ArcticZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 5,125
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by gtodoug
Arctic, I wasn't trying to get in a pissing match or anything, just trying to be funny but then started looking at why the tq difference was so great. Well, back to the drawing board!
No no, I know Glad I sparked some ideas

How bout instead of kissing me you just toss some ETP heads my way
Old 04-09-2006, 04:11 PM
  #53  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
gtodoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Miramar, FL
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Sport Side-I'm not getting any burst knock. I have my Burst knock retard table set too agressively. Timing is not tps driven as you know, at 100%tps I'm commanding 18* of timing. I don't get my full timing because I have the computer setup to pull timing upon rapid throttle transitions. Are you familiar with this table or am I missing what you are saying?

Dougie
Old 04-09-2006, 06:18 PM
  #54  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
383ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kansas City, KS
Posts: 2,893
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by gtodoug
Sport Side-I'm not getting any burst knock. I have my Burst knock retard table set too agressively. Timing is not tps driven as you know, at 100%tps I'm commanding 18* of timing. I don't get my full timing because I have the computer setup to pull timing upon rapid throttle transitions. Are you familiar with this table or am I missing what you are saying?

Dougie
but you are saying you can only run 17* before it starts pulling timing? I don't see burst knock being a big problem as far as dyno results go. it recovered from it by 3000rpm.
Old 04-09-2006, 06:41 PM
  #55  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
gtodoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Miramar, FL
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

383ss, you are correct in saying that I can only run 17* before I start to get KR. Arctic and I were speaking of tq available at 2800rpms or so and how mine was so low. With the burst kr table being overly aggressive from 2500-3000rpms my tq curve was especially weak. Maybe by desensitising the table and running it leaner than 12.1ish I can pick up some tq down low. That's all. I'm not stating it was a problem for the entire pull.

dougie
Old 04-16-2006, 06:45 PM
  #56  
Restricted User
iTrader: (17)
 
98Z28CobraKiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: WPB, FL
Posts: 5,783
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gtodoug
Drkphx-I'm going to try and run some more timing. I know that some thermal management is in order via the exhaust. SW sent me a nice email stating the exhaust would be shipping today.

This is what I'm running now:



Single 3" with 30" muffler

I'm installing this system:
dual 3" with x pipe.









Freakin sweet!
Old 04-16-2006, 06:50 PM
  #57  
Restricted User
iTrader: (17)
 
98Z28CobraKiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: WPB, FL
Posts: 5,783
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gtodoug
correct Fast/90 ported by Tony Mamo. NW 90mm tb.

dougie
There's one of your problems right there. Tony's intakes only work with AFR heads. Lucky for you I will take it off your hands, at a reduced price ofcourse.
Old 04-16-2006, 09:18 PM
  #58  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
gtodoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Miramar, FL
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Oh no my friend, it actually had to be opened up about 1.5mm in width on the intake runners. Other than that it bolted up just fine. LOL, got get some hp somewhere else

Dougie
Old 04-16-2006, 10:58 PM
  #59  
Restricted User
iTrader: (17)
 
98Z28CobraKiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: WPB, FL
Posts: 5,783
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Well I looked at the scan that you sent me and now I am wondering why you are able to hit cells over 1.00 in the g/cyl side of the spark table log and my table doesn't even go above 1.00 and I am only able to hit .76 at WOT.
Old 04-17-2006, 12:47 AM
  #60  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
gtodoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Miramar, FL
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Your spark table should have cells up to 1.20g/cyl. What version of HPtuners are you using?

Dougie


Quick Reply: LME 408/ET 245cc head results....



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:38 AM.