463 rwhp stock bottom end LS1...
#41
Originally Posted by jeffrey G
sorry to hijack the thread but I had a question about the 90/90...Would it be worth the money on my setup or should I stick with the ls1 intake? Ive heard arguments on both sides.
#49
Originally Posted by Stang's Bane
really nice #'s man. I had thought about using them as well. When i had talked to them they did not recommend heads or the fast 90 for a stock cube motor, I wonder why he changed his mind?
BTW- the cam is 228/234-114 .588/.574", it idles like a ***** cat and drives as nice as a stocker.
Boy, those new wheels sure do look nice on my car......
Brian
HiTech Motorsport
Last edited by HTMtrSprt; 05-02-2006 at 09:47 PM. Reason: added material
#50
Originally Posted by HTMtrSprt
Sorry guys.... my partner Bart thought that ported heads weren't really worth anything on a stock motor....when I found out he was telling people this, I told him that wasn't the case and he should stop turning people away from good heads. Well..... he said I should put my money where my mouth was so I bet him a new set of wheels and tires for my '05 Mustang that good heads were worth 30-40 RWHP. We found someone willing to let us use his car as a guinea pig and I went to work using a new cam grind and doing up a trick set of 5.3 heads with some unique port work learned from our Super Stock LS1 engine development. They come in at a paltry 195cc's. It requires modification to the manifold as well and the customer already had a FAST intake and 90mm TB so I matched it to the new port design. The car has a stock flywheel and clutch, heavy wheels and a 12 bolt to boot. I think it will run even better with a 1-3/4 to 1-7/8" step header as well. We just put an underdrive damper on it so we will post more results as they are available.
BTW- the cam is 228/234-114 .588/.574", it idles like a ***** cat and drives as nice as a stocker.
Boy, those new wheels sure do look nice on my car......
Brian
HiTech Motorsport
BTW- the cam is 228/234-114 .588/.574", it idles like a ***** cat and drives as nice as a stocker.
Boy, those new wheels sure do look nice on my car......
Brian
HiTech Motorsport
#51
Originally Posted by HTMtrSprt
Sorry guys.... my partner Bart thought that ported heads weren't really worth anything on a stock motor....when I found out he was telling people this, I told him that wasn't the case and he should stop turning people away from good heads. Well..... he said I should put my money where my mouth was so I bet him a new set of wheels and tires for my '05 Mustang that good heads were worth 30-40 RWHP. We found someone willing to let us use his car as a guinea pig and I went to work using a new cam grind and doing up a trick set of 5.3 heads with some unique port work learned from our Super Stock LS1 engine development. They come in at a paltry 195cc's. It requires modification to the manifold as well and the customer already had a FAST intake and 90mm TB so I matched it to the new port design. The car has a stock flywheel and clutch, heavy wheels and a 12 bolt to boot. I think it will run even better with a 1-3/4 to 1-7/8" step header as well. We just put an underdrive damper on it so we will post more results as they are available.
BTW- the cam is 228/234-114 .588/.574", it idles like a ***** cat and drives as nice as a stocker.
Boy, those new wheels sure do look nice on my car......
Brian
HiTech Motorsport
BTW- the cam is 228/234-114 .588/.574", it idles like a ***** cat and drives as nice as a stocker.
Boy, those new wheels sure do look nice on my car......
Brian
HiTech Motorsport
#56
The graph is SAE
The rest of the info is in my post # 11
I just right clicked on the graph that I scaned and copy and pasted it into paint, then saved it as a jpeg. That is how it came out Maybe someone from HiTech came post it up correctly.
The rest of the info is in my post # 11
I just right clicked on the graph that I scaned and copy and pasted it into paint, then saved it as a jpeg. That is how it came out Maybe someone from HiTech came post it up correctly.
#57
Originally Posted by HAULNTA
The graph is SAE
The rest of the info is in my post # 11
I just right clicked on the graph that I scaned and copy and pasted it into paint, then saved it as a jpeg. That is how it came out Maybe someone from HiTech came post it up correctly.
The rest of the info is in my post # 11
I just right clicked on the graph that I scaned and copy and pasted it into paint, then saved it as a jpeg. That is how it came out Maybe someone from HiTech came post it up correctly.
Thanks
#58
Originally Posted by HAULNTA
DYNORUN_012.drf-4/21/2006 9:41:48 PM Run Type: RO Run Conditions: 64.51 °F, 29.01 in-Hg, Humidity: 26%, SAE: 1.00
99 LS1 6SD
Max Torque = 430.81 Max Power = 460.49
LONG TUBES, LSX, HTM PREDITOR TOP END PACKAGE
DYNORUN_01 l.drf-4/21/2006 9:28:41 PM Run Type: RO Run Conditions: 64.84 °F, 28.97 in-Hg, Humidity: 27%, SAE: 1.00
99 LS1 6SD
Max Torque = 428.95 Max Power = 462.78
LONG TUBES, LSX, HTM PREDITOR TOP END PACKAGE
DYNORUN_010.drf-4/21/2006 9:03:45 PM Run Type: RO Run Conditions: 62.99 °F, 28.97 in-Hg, Humidity: 28%, SAE: 1.00
99 LS1 6SD
Max Torque = 426.21 Max Power = 461.28
99 LS1 6SD
Max Torque = 430.81 Max Power = 460.49
LONG TUBES, LSX, HTM PREDITOR TOP END PACKAGE
DYNORUN_01 l.drf-4/21/2006 9:28:41 PM Run Type: RO Run Conditions: 64.84 °F, 28.97 in-Hg, Humidity: 27%, SAE: 1.00
99 LS1 6SD
Max Torque = 428.95 Max Power = 462.78
LONG TUBES, LSX, HTM PREDITOR TOP END PACKAGE
DYNORUN_010.drf-4/21/2006 9:03:45 PM Run Type: RO Run Conditions: 62.99 °F, 28.97 in-Hg, Humidity: 28%, SAE: 1.00
99 LS1 6SD
Max Torque = 426.21 Max Power = 461.28