Wheel HP vs. track performance?
Race weight:3500
RWHP:403 Torque:366
8.80@87 1/8th mile
13.20@113 2.3 60' 1/4 mile
That was in 90 degree weather
This was in cooler weather
8.60@89 2.3 60'
What should I run on motor when I get my 60' time down?
I have a kit on the car and it put down 560RWHP and 510 Torque
What should I run on the kit?
RWHP:403 Torque:366
8.80@87 1/8th mile
13.20@113 2.3 60' 1/4 mile
That was in 90 degree weather
This was in cooler weather
8.60@89 2.3 60'
What should I run on motor when I get my 60' time down?
I have a kit on the car and it put down 560RWHP and 510 Torque
What should I run on the kit?
,|,, up yours jessie, no driver error on the automatics...
I was thinking about splitting autos and sticks with different colored marks or maybe NA and power adder cars. Need to get up around 100 data points first, 40 isnt enough.
Why don't you collect some data on those cars at your work and help me out. I need to fill in the scatter down on the bottom.
I was thinking about splitting autos and sticks with different colored marks or maybe NA and power adder cars. Need to get up around 100 data points first, 40 isnt enough.
Why don't you collect some data on those cars at your work and help me out. I need to fill in the scatter down on the bottom.
98 z28, small cam, ported heads, pt4000 stall, bolt ons, supsension, 3.42's, 17" dr's, 353rwhp/331rwtq, 11.39 at 117.8, raceweight is probably around 3250-3300, and DA was around 1600.
Originally Posted by TeEnAgE pHeNoM
What should I run on motor when I get my 60' time down?
Originally Posted by TeEnAgE pHeNoM
I have a kit on the car and it put down 560RWHP and 510 Torque
What should I run on the kit?
What should I run on the kit?
Bump. this thing got lost on page 2.
Still surprised how many people aren't posting, I keep seeing dyno results and track numbers in other threads. Would it be OK for me to duplicate this thread in the track results forum??
TJ
Still surprised how many people aren't posting, I keep seeing dyno results and track numbers in other threads. Would it be OK for me to duplicate this thread in the track results forum??
TJ
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power
Verdad Gallardo
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die
Verdad Gallardo
Originally Posted by 1BadAzzGT
Not sure if you're accepting Mustangs ....
you sure it weighs that much?? After fixing Black8Banger's weight, you are my new worst deviant.
3650 raceweight. 12.07 @ 111.82 with DA at 1100+ feet. Stock motor. 328.9 on a dynojet. I included the DA because I think the dyno corrects to sea level, doesn't it? I'm not sure how or if the DA during the track run should factor into this. This extra info couldn't hurt and since I knew it, I included it. Since there's easily 2-3 MPH trap speed difference when the DA changes by 2500' maybe this needs to be factored in as well??? 
Just something to consider in the search for accurate data. Particularly good or particularly bad DA could help explain the worst deviations.
Just something to consider in the search for accurate data. Particularly good or particularly bad DA could help explain the worst deviations. 
Teching In
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, Maryland
Originally Posted by NOS327
Yes, can you tell me a mustang board I can put this same post on?? I'm sure there are as many for them as there are GM stuff, I'm just in the dark on the blue oval
you sure it weighs that much?? After fixing Black8Banger's weight, you are my new worst deviant.
you sure it weighs that much?? After fixing Black8Banger's weight, you are my new worst deviant.
On the Mustang websites. Actually you're in luck, there is a post very similar for the info you need/want
Sorry about being your last deviant. I think my dyno #'s are very weird because of the nonlockup converters. Keep in mind that if you're trying to put together a master list or something, take into account that nonlockup converters in the higher hp cars lie
and don't show the true horsepower because of all the slip. Cheers,
Tim
I followed your link and added all of their posted information to my spreadsheet. Quite a bit more scatter around .140 hp/lb, but hey it's real data! They helped fill in 6 more points between .16 and .25.
Originally Posted by NOS327
Your mph shouldn't change much, maybe 1mph. Your ET will probably just get better by whatever you shave your 60'. So if you went from a 2.3 60' to a 1.8, just knock that 5/10 of your ET....12.7@113
According to the trendline, a 560rwhp, 3500lb car should go 127.8mph. IF you can get all that power to the ground, I guess you'd hope to go 10.5-11.0 like most 125mph cars. But I wouldn't go tell everyone your car CAN run 10.5 until you have a time slip though...
According to the trendline, a 560rwhp, 3500lb car should go 127.8mph. IF you can get all that power to the ground, I guess you'd hope to go 10.5-11.0 like most 125mph cars. But I wouldn't go tell everyone your car CAN run 10.5 until you have a time slip though...