Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

WTF! 5 hp gain after Kooks, 160 thermo, Ported TB, and more

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-05-2006, 09:46 AM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
solocus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Unhappy WTF! 5 hp gain after Kooks, 160 thermo, Ported TB, (posted graphs)

Ok, so I need some advice or comments on my situation. Dyno’d the car with just a lid and Holly Powershot filter just over a year ago and put down 308 rwhp 331 rwtq on a DynoJet. Over the winter made the following Mods:

Kooks 1-3/4 headers
Kooks ORY (no cats)
Jantzer Ported TB
160 degree thermostat
NGK tr-55
MSD wires
Free Ram Air Mod (cut lower Air Box)
Paper Air Filter (pulled the Holly Powershot)
Tune (remove Cags, Cats, Fan Temp to 160 degrees, and “98 octane tune”

So Saturday I go to another shop and get it dyno’d also on a DynoJet. First run was “dangerously lean” put down 307 rwhp and 319 rwtq. The guy dynoing it used HP Tuners to adjust my A/F to about 13.6 across RPM range and my numbers were 313 rwhp and 333 rwtq. He did this by just adjusting the fuel tables.

My thoughts, WTF $1000 plus and almost no gain! I guess I could have got major heat manifold heat soak from the FRA. Maybe a filter does make a huge difference. Could TPS on TB be jacked up? Do I need a professional Dyno tune? WTF

Last edited by solocus; 06-05-2006 at 08:06 PM. Reason: posted graphs
Old 06-05-2006, 10:00 AM
  #2  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
foff667's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Clermont, FL
Posts: 7,986
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

different dyno's different results...going "dangerously lean" on the stock tune sounds more like a mechanical issue then anything since the stock tune commands ~11.5:1 at wot in most calibrations...also 13.6:1 on a dyno will generally run slightly leaner on the street so its a possibility the tune is still off.
Old 06-05-2006, 10:03 AM
  #3  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
solocus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by foff667
different dyno's different results...going "dangerously lean" on the stock tune sounds more like a mechanical issue then anything since the stock tune commands ~11.5:1 at wot in most calibrations...also 13.6:1 on a dyno will generally run slightly leaner on the street so its a possibility the tune is still off.
It had a tune prior so it wasn't really a stock tune. I'll have to post graphs when i get home tonight to make sure i have my A/F numbers correct.
Old 06-05-2006, 10:09 AM
  #4  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
foff667's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Clermont, FL
Posts: 7,986
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

either or...some people have said form one dyno to the next there have been differences of up to 20hp...you'd really need a true before & after on the same dyno the same day to compare accuratly.
Old 06-05-2006, 10:29 AM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
 
niphilli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,695
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by solocus
Ok, so I need some advice or comments on my situation. Dyno’d the car with just a lid and Holly Powershot filter just over a year ago and put down 308 rwhp 331 rwtq on a DynoJet. Over the winter made the following Mods:

Kooks 1-3/4 headers
Kooks ORY (no cats)
Jantzer Ported TB
160 degree thermostat
NGK tr-55
MSD wires
Free Ram Air Mod (cut lower Air Box)
Paper Air Filter (pulled the Holly Powershot)
Tune (remove Cags, Cats, Fan Temp to 160 degrees, and “98 octane tune”

So Saturday I go to another shop and get it dyno’d also on a DynoJet. First run was “dangerously lean” put down 307 rwhp and 319 rwtq. The guy dynoing it used HP Tuners to adjust my A/F to about 13.6 across RPM range and my numbers were 313 rwhp and 333 rwtq. He did this by just adjusting the fuel tables.

My thoughts, WTF $1000 plus and almost no gain! I guess I could have got major heat manifold heat soak from the FRA. Maybe a filter does make a huge difference. Could TPS on TB be jacked up? Do I need a professional Dyno tune? WTF
IMHO 13.6 is not safe (Lean). Try running a diagnostic software against it. Look for knock, A/F (O2), timing, throttle position sensor...etc.
Old 06-05-2006, 10:30 AM
  #6  
8 Sec Tuner
iTrader: (2)
 
Mike TexaSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Wish I was in a boat fishing...
Posts: 4,641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Add some fuel.
Old 06-05-2006, 10:35 AM
  #7  
Banned
iTrader: (18)
 
TTPMatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Wayne, NJ
Posts: 2,984
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would look at false knock possibly. If the y-pipe pieces were not installed correctly it could be banging the floorboard. Bad gas... lots of things it could be. That combination I usually get at least 340+ out of even on a "non-dyno queen" car.
Old 06-05-2006, 11:13 AM
  #8  
11 Second Club
 
you2slo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

You run 98 octane in your bolt on car? You don't have a catback? You may have some constriction there.
Old 06-05-2006, 11:19 AM
  #9  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
silverTA2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Like they said 13.6 is still too lean.

What's funny is that at the dyno day I went to this weekend, the shop guys kept telling the LS1 cars that they should shoot for 13.5 to 1.

WRONG!!

They should shoot for 12.5 to 12.8 to 1 on a dyno wideband for a relatively safe tune with good power.
Old 06-05-2006, 11:21 AM
  #10  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
silverTA2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by you2slo
You run 98 octane in your bolt on car? You don't have a catback? You may have some constriction there.
Yeah, 98 octane is a big no no for a stock internally car.

You'll lose power.

The higher the octane the LESS combustible the fuel is. Unless you're running seriously high compression or tons of boost...... stick to 93 octane.
Old 06-05-2006, 12:48 PM
  #11  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
solocus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by silverTA2002
Yeah, 98 octane is a big no no for a stock internally car.

stick to 93 octane.
My bad, I meant 93 octane. My car ran smooth and sounded good, he had HP Tuners hooked up so I would have thought he would have caught detonation, he did catch detonation on a few other cars being dyno'd that day. It was hot in the shop, I saw 101 on one of his computer screens and i think a humidity of 30%. I thought this was all compensated for with SAE numbers.

I'm ditching the FRA and going back to the Holly air filter. There does seem to be some argument for manifold heat soak out there. Well the consensus seems to be add more fuel. so that will definately be on my list!

Mike
Old 06-05-2006, 06:18 PM
  #12  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (27)
 
SVT THIS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Owasso, Ok
Posts: 2,238
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Dyno numbers mean jack ****. What were your track times before and after? Did you improve? That's all I would worry about. You don't race people on the dyno...
Old 06-05-2006, 06:26 PM
  #13  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
cantdrv65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: TEXASS
Posts: 3,202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

13.6 is DEFFINITELY too lean...Id take it too someone who knows what they are doing.
Old 06-05-2006, 08:05 PM
  #14  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
solocus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Here are both graphs.
Could the temp 102 degrees almost be killing me?

First one with Lid and Holly filter



Second with kooks headers and ORY, ported TB, 160 thermo, FRA, Tr55 MSD Wires, paper filter
Old 06-05-2006, 09:47 PM
  #15  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
silverTA2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What's interesting is on your first dyno, you cut off right when the HP is about to peak. I'd bet you'd even make slightly more power if you'd kept in it.
Old 06-06-2006, 11:06 AM
  #16  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
solocus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by silverTA2002
What's interesting is on your first dyno, you cut off right when the HP is about to peak. I'd bet you'd even make slightly more power if you'd kept in it.
Heh, no doubt. I guess the guy didn't want to push it and I knew no better at that time.
Old 06-06-2006, 11:23 AM
  #17  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
98redorangeta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: From Ohio now in that state up north
Posts: 948
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

You definatly need to be a little more rich 13.6 to 1 isnt a good afr 13.0 would be better. Check the usual things over too if you can compression, fuel pressure (under load not at idel), plug gap just to make sure things are still in order.
Old 06-09-2006, 09:50 PM
  #18  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
NickcZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Euless-Grapevine TX
Posts: 1,982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

that sucks i slapped a set of stepped headers "kooks" and gained about 45rwhp
Old 06-10-2006, 09:06 AM
  #19  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Benjamin Russick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The Holley filter is worth 0-2 rwhp, so that doesn't sound like the problem. I would look for knock or an installation issue.
Old 06-10-2006, 09:29 AM
  #20  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Louie83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 1,844
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SVT THIS
Dyno numbers mean jack ****. What were your track times before and after? Did you improve? That's all I would worry about. You don't race people on the dyno...
Actually they use a thing called "physics" to test how much power your car is putting on the pavement.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:52 PM.