C6 Z06 New Dyno!!!!
C6 Z06 New Dyno!!!! Going today to get the Z06 retuned and dynoed by jeremy hes also swapping the manifold out so hopefully we gain 10 or so more HP. Ill post up dyno sheets and graphs after i get home around 3.
Last month teh car made 474.6hp and just under 450lbs ft or torque. Shooting for 500+.
Last month teh car made 474.6hp and just under 450lbs ft or torque. Shooting for 500+.
yep weve been talking like everyday lol. He is prob just exited as i am its my step dads car but i hooked him up with jeremy and hes at wrk today so i have to go meet up with jeremy at 2 so we can get started. Ill get everything posted up by tonight. Im sure i got a few pics layin around here if you guys wanna see the car.
Trending Topics
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power
Verdad Gallardo
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die
Verdad Gallardo
Im home jeremy explained alot to me about the differences between the 2 dynos and how a load bearing dyno has alot of margin for human error and actully usually reads higher #s that it should. He said a dynojet with SAE corrected numbers is the most accurate and leaves the least amount of room for error so here are my before and after dynos.
Before = Mike Norris Tune ...Dyno Dynamics Dyno(Load Bearing)
After = Jeremy Formato Tune ...DynoJet
Before = Mike Norris Tune ...Dyno Dynamics Dyno(Load Bearing)
After = Jeremy Formato Tune ...DynoJet
it scanned small so here is the close up of the numbers.
and a close up of the graph.
Baseline was 451rwhp/410lbsft torque
Best was 480rwhp/445lbsft torque
Total = 29hp/35lbs torque
Car runs awsome. You guys tell me what you think i cant really differentiate because of the vastness between 2 totally different dynos. Do you guys think the car gained anything?
and a close up of the graph.
Baseline was 451rwhp/410lbsft torque
Best was 480rwhp/445lbsft torque
Total = 29hp/35lbs torque
Car runs awsome. You guys tell me what you think i cant really differentiate because of the vastness between 2 totally different dynos. Do you guys think the car gained anything?
Last edited by blackbird00; Sep 7, 2006 at 06:00 PM.
Originally Posted by blackbird00
That run was at 97.6* also.
Originally Posted by blackbird00
Im home jeremy explained alot to me about the differences between the 2 dynos and how a load bearing dyno has alot of margin for human error and actully usually reads higher #s that it should. He said a dynojet with SAE corrected numbers is the most accurate and leaves the least amount of room for error so here are my before and after dynos.
i'd love to hear more on this, care to share more details?
On a load bearing dyno the computer must have the parameters loaded into it by a human before the dyno which leaves a great amount of room for error. On a dyno jet the parameters are pre loaded and not done by a human so therefore is much more accurate. I guess if you work on 1 type of car then i guess a load bearing is ok but if the car varies then errors occour.