C6 Z06 New Dyno!!!!
09-07-2006, 07:39 AM
#1
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C6 Z06 New Dyno!!!! Going today to get the Z06 retuned and dynoed by jeremy hes also swapping the manifold out so hopefully we gain 10 or so more HP. Ill post up dyno sheets and graphs after i get home around 3.
Last month teh car made 474.6hp and just under 450lbs ft or torque. Shooting for 500+.
Last month teh car made 474.6hp and just under 450lbs ft or torque. Shooting for 500+.
09-07-2006, 09:10 AM
#3
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yep weve been talking like everyday lol. He is prob just exited as i am its my step dads car but i hooked him up with jeremy and hes at wrk today so i have to go meet up with jeremy at 2 so we can get started. Ill get everything posted up by tonight. Im sure i got a few pics layin around here if you guys wanna see the car.
Trending Topics
09-07-2006, 05:44 PM
#12
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Im home jeremy explained alot to me about the differences between the 2 dynos and how a load bearing dyno has alot of margin for human error and actully usually reads higher #s that it should. He said a dynojet with SAE corrected numbers is the most accurate and leaves the least amount of room for error so here are my before and after dynos.
Before = Mike Norris Tune ...Dyno Dynamics Dyno(Load Bearing)
After = Jeremy Formato Tune ...DynoJet
Before = Mike Norris Tune ...Dyno Dynamics Dyno(Load Bearing)
After = Jeremy Formato Tune ...DynoJet
09-07-2006, 05:49 PM
#13
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
it scanned small so here is the close up of the numbers.
and a close up of the graph.
Baseline was 451rwhp/410lbsft torque
Best was 480rwhp/445lbsft torque
Total = 29hp/35lbs torque
Car runs awsome. You guys tell me what you think i cant really differentiate because of the vastness between 2 totally different dynos. Do you guys think the car gained anything?
and a close up of the graph.
Baseline was 451rwhp/410lbsft torque
Best was 480rwhp/445lbsft torque
Total = 29hp/35lbs torque
Car runs awsome. You guys tell me what you think i cant really differentiate because of the vastness between 2 totally different dynos. Do you guys think the car gained anything?
Last edited by blackbird00; 09-07-2006 at 06:00 PM.
09-07-2006, 06:06 PM
#15
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Fort Lauderdale
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by blackbird00
That run was at 97.6* also.
09-07-2006, 08:17 PM
#19
Originally Posted by blackbird00
Im home jeremy explained alot to me about the differences between the 2 dynos and how a load bearing dyno has alot of margin for human error and actully usually reads higher #s that it should. He said a dynojet with SAE corrected numbers is the most accurate and leaves the least amount of room for error so here are my before and after dynos.
i'd love to hear more on this, care to share more details?
09-07-2006, 08:45 PM
#20
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
On a load bearing dyno the computer must have the parameters loaded into it by a human before the dyno which leaves a great amount of room for error. On a dyno jet the parameters are pre loaded and not done by a human so therefore is much more accurate. I guess if you work on 1 type of car then i guess a load bearing is ok but if the car varies then errors occour.