pretty impressed with results
09-24-2006, 01:06 PM
#1
pretty impressed with results Dynoed the TA yesterday on a Dynojet and ended up with 317.45hp and 329.11tq on a loudmouth, ported maf, and airlid. Clutch was chattering but don't think that would matter. Still can't believe what I put down, but it's time for a cam...
09-24-2006, 03:22 PM
#3
Originally Posted by andypz28
that seems kinda low, i have headers, lid, exhaust and put down 312 on a mustang dyno. but either way, cant go wrong with a cam
You should worry about your car.
09-24-2006, 03:24 PM
#4
Originally Posted by DVS99TRANS
Dynoed the TA yesterday on a Dynojet and ended up with 317.45hp and 329.11tq on a loudmouth, ported maf, and airlid. Clutch was chattering but don't think that would matter. Still can't believe what I put down, but it's time for a cam...
10-10-2006, 12:05 AM
#6
TECH Regular
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by bene
Why low? He's only got a catback, ported MAF and a lid and his T/A is a 99. Your car dynoed REALLY low for a full exhaust and lid and O2/M6 model. You should worry about your car.
You should worry about your car.
Trending Topics
11-02-2006, 03:49 PM
#10
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Rockwall, TX
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DVS99TRANS
Dynoed the TA yesterday on a Dynojet and ended up with 317.45hp and 329.11tq on a loudmouth, ported maf, and airlid. Clutch was chattering but don't think that would matter. Still can't believe what I put down, but it's time for a cam...
Nice numbers man esp for a 99 mine went 330/340 with only lid, filter, off-road y and free mods
11-02-2006, 11:00 PM
#12
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by bene
Why low? He's only got a catback, ported MAF and a lid and his T/A is a 99. Your car dynoed REALLY low for a full exhaust and lid and O2/M6 model. You should worry about your car.
You should worry about your car.
11-03-2006, 01:24 AM
#13
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: College Station/Pasadena
Posts: 8,182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by andypz28
that seems kinda low, i have headers, lid, exhaust and put down 312 on a mustang dyno. but either way, cant go wrong with a cam
11-04-2006, 04:56 PM
#15
Originally Posted by andypz28
that seems kinda low, i have headers, lid, exhaust and put down 312 on a mustang dyno. but either way, cant go wrong with a cam
BTW-not picking on this guy,just every thread there are people knocking the #'s
11-06-2006, 10:11 PM
#16
For anyone that is picking on my car. It knocked before it hit it's peak because it was running like 10:1 and knocked at 5500rpm. Tell me there isn't more power to be had if I even got a basic frickin tune on it. The numbers on it would change dramatically but would put me in the 330 range for a catback, lid ,and selfported MAF. Everyone is entitled to there own opinion though.
11-08-2006, 08:59 PM
#18
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: THA CO
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by s346k
my contribution to this thread:
congrats on the dyno numbers - but they don't mean a damn thing to me. take it to the track and post up a timeslip.
congrats on the dyno numbers - but they don't mean a damn thing to me. take it to the track and post up a timeslip.
11-08-2006, 10:47 PM
#19
the closest 1/4 is about 2 1/2 to 3 hours from me in Richmond and the closest is an 1/8 that I can't get any traction. My best at the 1/8 here was 9.03 with a 2.87 60'. Unless you run slicks, you are forced to feather the clutch, bog, or spin. This is out of about 45-50 runs and I know how to drive my damn car, strip or street.