233 239 in here please!
01-16-2007, 09:43 PM
#27
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Elizabethtown, KY
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Only on the graph I posted, it had a fouled plug for that pull. After changing the plugs the graph smoothed out, and the car was run to 6800-6900RPM, which gave me my peak numbers, as i stated earlier. thanks for the suggestions, keep them comming. i just think something is not right.
01-16-2007, 09:55 PM
#29
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TheLS1Kid
interesting...i didnt know there was another version. do you know the specs on the newer version?
I'm unsure of a different version too!, But I do know that what they advertise on there site is not actually the correct specs of the cam. How do I know this, you may ask? Well when I opened my cam box and noticed there was no spec card I called up comp cams and gave them the numbers on the end of the cam as well as my email. The guy there emailed me a spec sheet of the actual grind specs. He also informed they advertise different on there sites so competitors don't use the exact same grinds.
01-17-2007, 08:42 AM
#30
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,724
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 2001bluerata
I'm unsure of a different version too!, But I do know that what they advertise on there site is not actually the correct specs of the cam. How do I know this, you may ask? Well when I opened my cam box and noticed there was no spec card I called up comp cams and gave them the numbers on the end of the cam as well as my email. The guy there emailed me a spec sheet of the actual grind specs. He also informed they advertise different on there sites so competitors don't use the exact same grinds.
01-17-2007, 03:12 PM
#34
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Edgewater, MD
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ericbigmac83
damn, that was my next question. What intake do you have? Do you have the graph of the final run?
It says that he even has a 90/90 setup
01-18-2007, 10:05 PM
#37
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (40)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Scottsboro, AL
Posts: 666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm running the same cam, however it has the "V2" designation. Check the sig for the numbers it made. Pull was made to 6600, since the cam started to roll off after that.
Specs are: 233/239 .595/.603
Lost a bit down low, but pulls HARD up top...
Tuner said it probably had a bit more in it, but I chose to keep it safe. Plus the weather conditions that day weren't too favorable...~94 degrees, high humidity, etc...
Specs are: 233/239 .595/.603
Lost a bit down low, but pulls HARD up top...
Tuner said it probably had a bit more in it, but I chose to keep it safe. Plus the weather conditions that day weren't too favorable...~94 degrees, high humidity, etc...
01-19-2007, 07:27 AM
#39
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Elizabethtown, KY
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yeah, he made about 10 pulls so i'd say he did. i'm doubting my assembly skills before i doubt the tune. i think the tune is pretty dead on.
01-20-2007, 12:02 PM
#40
TECH Addict
iTrader: (19)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Owings, Md
Posts: 2,157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Hawk108
It says that he even has a 90/90 setup