Well, here are the numbers on a Dynojet 224. SAE corrected. See below. No knock...


Also will have track numbers posted tomorrow night from Cecil.



This is full bolt ons minus EWP and minus Fast intake.

 

Good numbers. Great power in the low rpm's too.

 

damn almost went tonight!!! let us know. good numbers

 

^That TQ curve looks much more believeable vs Below (not to beat a dead horse)



Good luck at the track!

 

great #'s, but why so lean under 5K rpm ?

 

cam only.
Holy crap.

 

i think that tune needs to be tweeked. My A/F was straight as an arrow.

 

Yeah, the tune definetly needs to be tweaked. Not only that, but I think my Wideband is a little screwy. I may need to recalibrate it or change the sensor soon. Been going strong for 3 years now.

I actually think if I can fatten it up below 4500, the torque curve will flatten out. Fixing the exhaust leaks and KR threw some things for a loop.

 

what else besides a cam ?

 

looks good, yeah richen it up below 5100 and torque should flatten a little.

 

Holy ****, that bitch is lean! Enjoy it while it lasts.

 

until you miss a shift

14.2 at 4500?

 

Strong numbers man & yup she need some more fuel down low....Cam only numbers keep gettin better & better everyday

peace

 

Geat numbers but definately fatten her up in those lower RPMS. Shoot for 13 to 1 across the board, and fatten a couple tenths from 4000 rpms up. 12.8 to 1 from 4000 rpms. JMO good luck, and get some heads. WOW !!

 

This is with the new headers? Def much more believable low end than the last dyno.

 

Its not fair to compare two different makes of dynos let alone two of the same make dynos. Each setup is slightly different as is the way torque is calculated by each manufacturer. Whether it’s the most accurate torque calculation or not, DynoJet has pretty much cornered the marketplace and runs the tables as far as numbers are concerned. So we now have HP numbers between 2 different brand of dyno's with in 5 HP of each other and HP and TQ are directly related through and calculated by the dyno using the equation [Tq = (hp x 5252)/RPM] how can hp be right and Tq wrong? Again, maybe its in the different calculations of each dyno mfg. and we simply cannot reference between all of them.

Matt

 

I didn't doubt numbers I doubted the CURVE of the previous dyno.

 

Well, here are the track numbers.

Best 2 passes of the day were both 11.71's. MPH were 120.92 and 121.02

60fts for each were 1.71 (bog) and 1.78 (sliping).

All runs granny shifted. Clutch combo wont let me power shift.

No matter how hard I left I could not get into the 1.6's. Launch technique was a fast drop between 5000 and 5500 rpm.

Shift light came on at 6600.

Full weight 17inch MT Dr's

How can I get this 60ft down without compromisng the handling it currently has? Thoughts? Video below.

TA pass at Cecil

 

good job! Now that power is starting to show. You will only get faster.

 

those are good times for a 1.7 60ft and not granny shifting .......but your mph will drop a little with a better 60.ft. My car ran a 11.2 @ 120 with 424rwhp and a 1.56 60ft.
Since then I retuned and made 452 rwhp but haven't made a NA pass since the last gain in HP. In my eyes track times and mph help show how much real rwhp your making.It's still to soon to tell because the bugs are not worked out yet . A set of 16"rims and 26" tires will help you out at the track for the quick fix. A better way to go would be a set of 15" rims with a set of 28" slicks would get the most NA out of it. The car is making great power for a cam only car and will get quicker. I would pull low 1.62-1.65 60's with stock suspension and a set of 16" slicks 26" tall