Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

TEA L92 headed 416ci Z06 going to the dyno tuning tomorrow 10am

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-06-2007, 09:42 AM
  #21  
Shorty Director
iTrader: (1)
 
VINCE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Valrico, Florida
Posts: 8,260
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

There are always more tuning with very aggressive setups like this..
Old 05-06-2007, 01:07 PM
  #22  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (13)
 
Brian Tooley Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,943
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

I know the same shop that had already made 550 RWHP with the TEA ported L92 heads was doing the tuning on this, except of course the previous combo had a 114 LSA cam and this one was 111 LSA, at the customers request.
Old 05-06-2007, 01:14 PM
  #23  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
allngn_c5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western Burbs of Detroit
Posts: 6,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Brian Tooley
I know the same shop that had already made 550 RWHP with the TEA ported L92 heads was doing the tuning on this, except of course the previous combo had a 114 LSA cam and this one was 111 LSA, at the customers request.

Hey Brian, what exactly does having the cam on a 111 lsa do on the exact same same setup vs having the cam on 114 lsa? Is there any other reason other then having the power come on earlier? Sorry should've pm'd this.
Old 05-06-2007, 05:18 PM
  #24  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
mike c.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: mi
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I'd also like to know Brian?
Old 05-10-2007, 07:27 AM
  #25  
TECH Fanatic
 
SideStep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Any results back yet or did this turn into vapor-ware???

Old 05-10-2007, 08:34 AM
  #26  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
WKMCD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 3,416
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SideStep
Any results back yet or did this turn into vapor-ware???

Old 05-10-2007, 10:25 AM
  #27  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (13)
 
Brian Tooley Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,943
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by allngn_c5
Hey Brian, what exactly does having the cam on a 111 lsa do on the exact same same setup vs having the cam on 114 lsa? Is there any other reason other then having the power come on earlier? Sorry should've pm'd this.
Narrower LSA cams help exhaust scavenging which helps torque, but at the upper RPM's, at least on a 6500 RPM LS engine with a very efficient exhaust port, that scavenging tends to overscavenge and therefore make less horsepower.

Bigger valves tend to "help" this scavenging, but the combination of the bigger L92 valves and narrow LSA don't tend to create addtional torque, just less horsepower.

I've not ever spoken with this customer, he ordered the heads through a dealer, but I heard the car made 530 RWHP with issues, and he is sorting them out and is going to get back on the dyno.
Old 05-10-2007, 03:12 PM
  #28  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
beardWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lake Jackson,TX
Posts: 2,879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Set-ups just take time. He will post his numbers! I`ve been threw alot with mine, I understand!! Good Luck!

Remember, dyno numbers don`t win races!
Old 05-11-2007, 12:34 PM
  #29  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
allngn_c5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western Burbs of Detroit
Posts: 6,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Brian Tooley
Narrower LSA cams help exhaust scavenging which helps torque, but at the upper RPM's, at least on a 6500 RPM LS engine with a very efficient exhaust port, that scavenging tends to overscavenge and therefore make less horsepower.

Bigger valves tend to "help" this scavenging, but the combination of the bigger L92 valves and narrow LSA don't tend to create addtional torque, just less horsepower.

I've not ever spoken with this customer, he ordered the heads through a dealer, but I heard the car made 530 RWHP with issues, and he is sorting them out and is going to get back on the dyno.

Thanks a lot for finally responding. That helps me understand why my car is making so much torque for only being 346 cubic inches. I too have the larger valves to help make up the hp loss of the tighter LSA cam. Louis did a hell of a job on my car. Can't say enough about him and LG Motorsports staff.
Old 05-11-2007, 10:53 PM
  #30  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
speed_demon24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 4,609
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Brian Tooley
Narrower LSA cams help exhaust scavenging which helps torque, but at the upper RPM's, at least on a 6500 RPM LS engine with a very efficient exhaust port, that scavenging tends to overscavenge and therefore make less horsepower.

Bigger valves tend to "help" this scavenging, but the combination of the bigger L92 valves and narrow LSA don't tend to create addtional torque, just less horsepower.

I've not ever spoken with this customer, he ordered the heads through a dealer, but I heard the car made 530 RWHP with issues, and he is sorting them out and is going to get back on the dyno.
Would the same hold true for an LT1 with heads that flow 282/200 at .600?
Old 05-29-2007, 08:39 AM
  #31  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
WKMCD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 3,416
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SideStep
Any results back yet or did this turn into vapor-ware???

Old 06-06-2007, 07:36 AM
  #32  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
325trooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Euless, TX
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SideStep
Any results back yet or did this turn into vapor-ware???

Guess it didn't go so well.
Old 06-06-2007, 07:47 AM
  #33  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
allngn_c5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western Burbs of Detroit
Posts: 6,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I think this whole thread was BS. No results after this long of a wait. Cmon something smells fishy.
Old 06-06-2007, 07:50 AM
  #34  
TECH Fanatic
 
SideStep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by allngn_c5
I think this whole thread was BS. No results after this long of a wait. Cmon something smells fishy.



Any INFO???
Old 06-06-2007, 07:53 AM
  #35  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (11)
 
Billiumss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Erie, PA
Posts: 2,975
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Maybe the engine popped?
Old 06-06-2007, 06:50 PM
  #36  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
beardWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lake Jackson,TX
Posts: 2,879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Lets just be patient. He will post soon!
Old 06-06-2007, 09:23 PM
  #37  
TECH Fanatic
 
SideStep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by beardWS6
Lets just be patient. He will post soon!

Patient?!?!?!

This thread has been floating around since the 16th of April...


Old 06-07-2007, 06:11 AM
  #38  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (23)
 
WMSuperSport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Ft. Worth, TX
Posts: 1,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

If you ever build a nice setup on your own, you'll probably realize that **** doesn't always work perfectly at first. You'd be surprised at how much little **** that doesn't go right can **** you off so much.

Now if you just pay someone else to do it, then you never know any better...

Wes
Old 06-07-2007, 06:15 AM
  #39  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
WKMCD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 3,416
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SideStep
Patient?!?!?!

This thread has been floating around since the 16th of April...


Old 06-07-2007, 07:27 AM
  #40  
TECH Fanatic
 
SideStep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by WMSuperSport
If you ever build a nice setup on your own, you'll probably realize that **** doesn't always work perfectly at first. You'd be surprised at how much little **** that doesn't go right can **** you off so much.

Now if you just pay someone else to do it, then you never know any better...

Wes


I have built several "nice" setups of my own... by myself...

In the world of engine performance no news is bad news...



Quick Reply: TEA L92 headed 416ci Z06 going to the dyno tuning tomorrow 10am



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:17 AM.