Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

Im doubting the LS3 dynos....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-04-2007, 02:37 PM
  #21  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
White_Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RC45
Who posted anything about stock LS3's dynoing over 400 to the wheel?

There were posts about tuned/header/intake cars making 400, but nothing abotu stock cars from what I recall.

So, I hear that the new Viper will only be making 600bhp... wow and its still gonna weigh like 2 tonnes - I can't wait to meet one on the streets
That is why I asked him for a link earlier in here. It wouldn't be the first time a Viper guy trolled into here to have a little fun. I was just being polite about it.

-Geoff
Old 09-04-2007, 09:34 PM
  #22  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (9)
 
ChucksZ06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 976
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

If I drove a Viper I would feel like a fool too. How do you even get off talking about stock horsepower levels. I know guys like you who are afraid to mod there cars and have to depend on the factory and lots of money. My sons have used camaros that have 400 rwhp, big deal. I bet you wear designer jeans when you go out to punk lesser cars in your big bad Viper.
Old 09-05-2007, 12:13 AM
  #23  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
Killemall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Ha ha ha ha..

7 year Army infantry solder here...You go be an Infantry solder for even a 7 day field problem and then you'll realize how lame the desgner pants thing is...

Rich wife????

ha ha ha ha...

Rich to me is 500 grand plus a year..Im no wear neat that..Not even half that...Just an upper middle class if anything..

Me and my "rich wife" have been running a buisness together for the past few years...

As far as calling my wife a bitch..Whats the use of me saying anything. We both no what any man would do to any man who referred to his wife as a bitch..But being as were probaly thousands of miles away from each other..It'd be a waste of my time...

Again thanks for the info guys and i apologize for my chosen " **** sucker" words..

On viper Alley this isnt a big deal..And for a second I forgot were I was..Again I apologize
Old 09-05-2007, 02:09 AM
  #24  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
Killemall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ChucksZ06
If I drove a Viper I would feel like a fool too. How do you even get off talking about stock horsepower levels. I know guys like you who are afraid to mod there cars and have to depend on the factory and lots of money. My sons have used camaros that have 400 rwhp, big deal. I bet you wear designer jeans when you go out to punk lesser cars in your big bad Viper.

Is my sig visable????

SRT10's dyno 435-465 rwhp SAE on dyno jets...They trapp 119-123 mph..400 rwhp..Yea you know plenty of guys that have that, good for you..

My 1999 Viper dynoed 410 rwhp bone stock..No biggie...The one i have now would even dyno higher stock..but it's not stock..

Again is my sig visable??? Everyone of my cars was modded
Old 09-05-2007, 03:00 AM
  #25  
On The Tree
iTrader: (15)
 
1999vetteroo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

This **** is sad! This could have been a great thread.........
Old 09-05-2007, 05:37 AM
  #26  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
99Silverado5.3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: (281)-(713)-(832)
Posts: 2,558
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default LS3 dyno

bone stock vs. headers + tune.

Old 09-05-2007, 06:55 AM
  #27  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
allngn_c5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western Burbs of Detroit
Posts: 6,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Thanks for posting the LG Motorsports graph bro. Shows exactly what you get in stock form vs the k&n, header, and tune version. BTW the x4 cam they put in got around 480 something. Sick power.
Old 09-05-2007, 08:36 AM
  #28  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Checkmate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Front Royal, VA
Posts: 1,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by allngn_c5
Easy Killemall !! You know that type of **** will get you a vacation. No need to be in the realm of 25 psi. You post a lot of good info. Albeit mostly straight from the recent M/T or C/D but still useful. Continue being an asset not an *******. Ok buddy, pep talks over.

I have never posted ANYTHING from MT or CD. Go back to viperalley.
Old 09-05-2007, 08:40 AM
  #29  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (22)
 
WHPLASH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Macomb Michigan
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by allngn_c5
Thanks for posting the LG Motorsports graph bro. Shows exactly what you get in stock form vs the k&n, header, and tune version. BTW the x4 cam they put in got around 480 something. Sick power.

With the cam and tune was 506/454 rwhp. Damn!!!
Old 09-05-2007, 10:24 AM
  #30  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
bad2000z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Vestal NY
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Killemall, I apologize for the bitch comment. You seem to be hell bent on starting trouble lately...why?

While we're on the subject, why would the 2008 Viper with an additional 90hp "only" trap 3mph higher than the previous model?
Old 09-05-2007, 10:37 AM
  #31  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
allngn_c5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western Burbs of Detroit
Posts: 6,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by WHPLASH
With the cam and tune was 506/454 rwhp. Damn!!!

Yeah Dennis you are correct. The 480 + rwhp was what the car made with the new cam and the factory tune. Amazing !! I was surprised it ran well enough with the factory tune to do a full pull. After tuning was complete they found themselves with another 20 or so rwhp.
Old 09-05-2007, 10:54 AM
  #32  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
White_Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I am still waiting for the link showing 400 stock. Where did you see it Killemall? Prove you are not a troll and post it up.

-Geoff
Old 09-05-2007, 12:02 PM
  #33  
TECH Apprentice
 
02ZOh6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Killemall

And it could possibly be the air...In really bad conditions there were a few 1996-2002 Viper reviews that only trapped 117...
I was at the track with a 99 RT 10 (personalized plate) and it was only trapping 110 . I was trapping 115. My car has trapped 110 also on a very humid summer night. Driver can also make a difference here as always.
Old 09-05-2007, 03:52 PM
  #34  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Louie83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 1,844
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Oh crap, what happened to your 99?

I must have totally missed that thread.
Old 09-05-2007, 09:12 PM
  #35  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
Killemall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 02ZOh6
I was at the track with a 99 RT 10 (personalized plate) and it was only trapping 110 . I was trapping 115. My car has trapped 110 also on a very humid summer night. Driver can also make a difference here as always.

Sure it wasnt a 1992-1995 rt10???

Those trapp 110-114 mph

Lowest trapp I ever saw a mag get was 116.8...Highest was 121.1 for the 1996-2002 Vipers...

As for the LGmotorsport numbers..I dont beleave them for a second..

No offense the LGM..But with my c5 I remember there BONE STOCK graphs always seeming pretty high in order to make there after market performance numbers even higher...

Maybey that is or isnt the case hear.. Time will tell when we see real dynos..

Im not gonna go find threads from all the internet..But there is a lot of hype about 400 rwhp and 11's bone stock..

I was doubting it due to what the LS2's dynoed and the LS3's trapp speeds.
Old 09-05-2007, 10:15 PM
  #36  
TECH Apprentice
 
02ZOh6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Killemall
Sure it wasnt a 1992-1995 rt10???

Those trapp 110-114 mph

Lowest trapp I ever saw a mag get was 116.8...Highest was 121.1 for the 1996-2002 Vipers...
Nah. Like I said it had personalized plates. I guess he could have kept his 99 plate and bought a 95 and put them on but the wheels weren't right for 95. I asked him to run but he said I would kill him. Must have been a lemon. I've seen a 97 GTS go 12.2's@116 at the same track, different day.
Old 09-05-2007, 10:42 PM
  #37  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
White_Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Killemall
Im not gonna go find threads from all the internet..But there is a lot of hype about 400 rwhp and 11's bone stock..
So what you are saying is that you are a troll, making things up to start **** here? I haven't ever seen a 400 bone stock thread before. I call BS.



-Geoff
Old 09-06-2007, 07:18 AM
  #38  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (22)
 
WHPLASH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Macomb Michigan
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Quote Killemall: Im not gonna go find threads from all the internet..But there is a lot of hype about 400 rwhp and 11's bone stock..

Please find some for us or even one, because no one on the board has heard or seen this.

Lock this thread!!! If you don't have proof, this thread is useless.
Old 09-06-2007, 09:00 AM
  #39  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
allngn_c5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western Burbs of Detroit
Posts: 6,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Killemall
As for the LGmotorsport numbers..I dont beleave them for a second..

No offense the LGM..But with my c5 I remember there BONE STOCK graphs always seeming pretty high in order to make there after market performance numbers even higher...

Maybey that is or isnt the case hear.. Time will tell when we see real dynos..

As far as LG posting high stock dynos to make there mod numbers higher....That makes no sense. If anything they would want to release lower base numbers so that when modded it would show a larger gain over stock and create more marketing excitement. Get real killemall. You just busted on yourself so bad. Another point to make, if you don't trust LG's dyno numbers, then go look at MTI's, MTI released even higher bone stock numbers. Only way MTI could get higher numbers would be if they are tweaking them, or they got a test mule with more break in miles on the clock. Killemall you are a decent guy, at least I think so, but some of the **** you post is *** backwards. Take a chill for a minute.
Old 09-06-2007, 01:05 PM
  #40  
Launching!
 
Ryan L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Damn, sounds like theres alot of jealous F-body guys in here. Killemall never sounded like a nut swinger. He even make a point SEVERAL times that he created the thread with an open mind and wanted to see what the real story behind the LS3 is. He never deviated from that at all and only blew up after a bunch of little kids started flaming.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:18 PM.