383 LS7 heads vs. 427 LS3 heads
#1
383 LS7 heads vs. 427 LS3 heads
Ok here is the battle 383 with LS7 heads versus 427 with LS3 heads.
Both engines would have the best cnc versions Both appox 11:1 cr both would have comparable cams spec to displacement and heads . And both would be running factory style intakes . I think I know who the winner is hear but, I would like know the estimated power of these two are .
Both engines would have the best cnc versions Both appox 11:1 cr both would have comparable cams spec to displacement and heads . And both would be running factory style intakes . I think I know who the winner is hear but, I would like know the estimated power of these two are .
#2
Bore is too small for either head on a 383 3.903 bore size. Physical contact of intake valve and bore with LS7 and poor performance of LS3 on that bore compared to cathedrals. Go big.
#4
Ok, that makes a lot more sense as 388's are more common, but why 4.100 instead of 4.125 or greater? Coincidentally, Danny Popp is a Corvette roadrace buddy of mine just had a LS7 headed 388 done by Lingenfelter for his Optima car for the reason that he wants to extend the RPM range and lower the torque to manage the 200tw tires used in the Optima batteries USCA series.
#5
Ok, that makes a lot more sense as 388's are more common, but why 4.100 instead of 4.125 or greater? Coincidentally, Danny Popp is a Corvette roadrace buddy of mine just had a LS7 headed 388 done by Lingenfelter for his Optima car for the reason that he wants to extend the RPM range and lower the torque to manage the 200tw tires used in the Optima batteries USCA series.
Trending Topics
#9
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (19)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Its about setup and what you do with it. Either one can make more power than the other. Which setup is the car more optimized for (ex gearing, converter, shift points, weight etc.)