Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

New combo coming soon, what would the pros expect on a dynojet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-14-2008, 01:06 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
blu1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default New combo coming soon, what would the pros expect on a dynojet

I know everyone hates these threads but Im bored at work. The car is a 1999 FRC Corvette MN6 that previously made 440rwhp and 390rwtq SAE with the setup below:

PRC 5.3l stage 2.5 heads
TSP MS3 on a 113
LS6 manifold
ported LS6 TB
K&N filter with high flow bridge
TSP headers with no cats
custom magnaflow exhaust
42# injectors

New additions are going to be:
Vengeance ported fast 90mm
ported LS2 90mm TB
Patrick G 232/238 .612/.607 xfi lobes on a 111+1
powerbond UDP
Vararam
ARP 2000 rod bolts
built 3.90 rear

Well lets hear it folks!
Old 02-14-2008, 01:17 PM
  #2  
Internet Mechanic
iTrader: (17)
 
BlackScreaminMachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Wallingford CT
Posts: 9,831
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Well I am not expert persay but I just wanted to say that was damn good power at the peak for the old setup. With the additional bolt ons and custom spec'ed cam. I would hope to see 450-455 to the wheel SAE corrected hp.

I think the big increase you will see will be from 2.5k to 5k (under the curve). Id like to see that overlay.
Old 02-14-2008, 01:28 PM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
blu1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BlackScreaminMachine
Well I am not expert persay but I just wanted to say that was damn good power at the peak for the old setup. With the additional bolt ons and custom spec'ed cam. I would hope to see 450-455 to the wheel SAE corrected hp.

I think the big increase you will see will be from 2.5k to 5k (under the curve). Id like to see that overlay.
sadly I don't have the run files from the previous setup, just the plot. I am not really expecting to lose much peak power with the smaller cam but it should absolutely destroy the torque below 4k of the MS3 setup.
Old 02-14-2008, 03:53 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
 
john563's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: dayton ohio
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I have that same exact set up(soon) except I'm an A4. Right down to the pat g cam!!!! currently I have a tr224/112 cam tsp stage 2.5 5.3 heads with aported 90/90.I dropped my car off to install that same cam and an Slp pulley.I wont know for about 2 weeks though.Right now I put down 417rwhp 407rwt(corrected) It still has more in it,but I'll just see what it does with the new cam and pulley. I'm hoping for 440
If you left your gears alone I'd say 460 and change,but stepping up in gear you lose some DYNO numbers so I'll say 450 and change

Last edited by john563; 02-14-2008 at 04:09 PM. Reason: opinion
Old 02-15-2008, 07:53 AM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
blu1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by john563
I have that same exact set up(soon) except I'm an A4. Right down to the pat g cam!!!! currently I have a tr224/112 cam tsp stage 2.5 5.3 heads with aported 90/90.I dropped my car off to install that same cam and an Slp pulley.I wont know for about 2 weeks though.Right now I put down 417rwhp 407rwt(corrected) It still has more in it,but I'll just see what it does with the new cam and pulley. I'm hoping for 440
If you left your gears alone I'd say 460 and change,but stepping up in gear you lose some DYNO numbers so I'll say 450 and change
Wow crazy we have the same exact spec cam. I was hoping for at least 460 but I really care more about how the car performs at the track over a peaky dyno number.
Old 02-15-2008, 01:49 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
 
john563's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: dayton ohio
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by blu1
Wow crazy we have the same exact spec cam. I was hoping for at least 460 but I really care more about how the car performs at the track over a peaky dyno number.
actually he specced me a 230/236 but ended up with the specs mentioned.I dont mind that it is bigger,just as long as it fit which it will. I'll keep an eye on this thread,and if I get my car`back sooner I'll let you know what it gained with that cam and pulley
I think it will perform,and feel better down low
Old 02-15-2008, 05:26 PM
  #7  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
 
chrs1313's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,697
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

around 15rwhp more
Old 02-15-2008, 06:24 PM
  #8  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
KONG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blu1
I know everyone hates these threads but Im bored at work. The car is a 1999 FRC Corvette MN6 that previously made 440rwhp and 390rwtq SAE with the setup below:

PRC 5.3l stage 2.5 heads
TSP MS3 on a 113
LS6 manifold
ported LS6 TB
K&N filter with high flow bridge
TSP headers with no cats
custom magnaflow exhaust
42# injectors

New additions are going to be:
Vengeance ported fast 90mm
ported LS2 90mm TB
Patrick G 232/238 .612/.607 xfi lobes on a 111+1
powerbond UDP
Vararam
ARP 2000 rod bolts
built 3.90 rear

Well lets hear it folks!
465ish....41xtq




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:21 AM.